Wateska Angela R, Nowalk Mary Patricia, Lin Chyongchiou J, Harrison Lee H, Schaffner William, Zimmerman Richard K, Smith Kenneth J
University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States.
Vaccine. 2019 Mar 28;37(14):2026-2033. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
Changing pneumococcal disease epidemiology due to childhood vaccination has prompted re-examination of US adult pneumococcal vaccination policies, as have considerations of greater pneumococcal disease incidence and higher prevalence of conditions that increase risk in underserved minority populations. Prior analyses suggest routine pneumococcal vaccination at age 50 could be considered, which could disproportionately benefit underserved populations.
A Markov cohort model estimated the cost-effectiveness of US pneumococcal vaccination policies in hypothetical 50-year-old underserved minority and general population cohorts. Strategies included receiving one or both available pneumococcal vaccines based on age- or chronic condition-specific criteria. US databases and medical literature data calibrated pneumococcal illness incidence, vaccine serotype distributions, age- and race-specific chronic condition distributions, and costs. Black population data were used as a proxy for underserved minorities. We took a US healthcare perspective, discounting at 3%/year. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed and scenarios modeling differing vaccine assumptions were examined.
In both black and general population 50-year-olds, giving both pneumococcal vaccines to all 50-year-olds prevented the most disease, but cost >$250,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Current CDC recommendations (both vaccines for the immunocompromised, polysaccharide vaccine for other high-risk conditions) were economically favorable in either population when analyses assumed polysaccharide vaccine was ineffective against nonbacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia (NBP). If polysaccharide vaccine is effective against NBP or if less complex age-based vaccination recommendations result in increased vaccine uptake, giving polysaccharide vaccine to all 50-year-olds cost <$100,000/QALY; this effect was more pronounced in black cohorts. Results were robust in 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
Despite changes in pneumococcal epidemiology, current CDC recommendations were favored in underserved minority and general population cohorts. Polysaccharide vaccine for all 50-year-olds could be considered under some vaccine uptake and effectiveness assumptions, particularly if mitigating racial health disparities in pneumococcal disease is a priority.
由于儿童疫苗接种导致肺炎球菌疾病流行病学发生变化,促使人们重新审视美国成人肺炎球菌疫苗接种政策,同时也考虑到肺炎球菌疾病发病率上升以及在服务不足的少数族裔人群中增加风险的疾病患病率较高。先前的分析表明,可以考虑在50岁时进行常规肺炎球菌疫苗接种,这可能会使服务不足的人群受益更多。
一个马尔可夫队列模型估计了美国肺炎球菌疫苗接种政策在假设的50岁服务不足的少数族裔和普通人群队列中的成本效益。策略包括根据年龄或慢性病特定标准接种一种或两种可用的肺炎球菌疫苗。美国数据库和医学文献数据校准了肺炎球菌疾病发病率、疫苗血清型分布、年龄和种族特异性慢性病分布以及成本。黑人人群数据被用作服务不足的少数族裔的代表。我们采用美国医疗保健视角,按每年3%进行贴现。进行了单因素和概率敏感性分析,并研究了对不同疫苗假设进行建模的情景。
在50岁的黑人和普通人群中,给所有50岁的人接种两种肺炎球菌疫苗预防的疾病最多,但每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本超过25万美元。当分析假设多糖疫苗对非菌血症性肺炎球菌肺炎(NBP)无效时,美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)目前的建议(免疫功能低下者接种两种疫苗,其他高危情况接种多糖疫苗)在这两个人群中在经济上都是有利的。如果多糖疫苗对NBP有效,或者如果不太复杂的基于年龄的疫苗接种建议导致疫苗接种率提高,给所有50岁的人接种多糖疫苗的成本低于10万美元/QALY;这种效果在黑人队列中更为明显。单因素和概率敏感性分析的结果都很稳健。
尽管肺炎球菌流行病学发生了变化,但美国疾病控制与预防中心目前的建议在服务不足的少数族裔和普通人群队列中更受青睐。在某些疫苗接种率和有效性假设下,可以考虑给所有50岁的人接种多糖疫苗,特别是如果将减少肺炎球菌疾病中的种族健康差距作为优先事项。