Newman Neil B, Sherry Alexander D, Byrne Daniel W, Osmundson Evan C
Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
J Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jun;8(2):239-248. doi: 10.1007/s13566-019-00395-x. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
This study was designed to compare survival outcomes for non-surgically managed T1-T2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who received either stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).
The was queried between 2004-2015 for patients with T1-T2N0M0 SCLC. Patients must have been treated with curative intent SBRT or CFRT (delivered daily or twice daily, 45-70 Gy) with or without chemotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). A subset analysis of patient receiving chemotherapy was also performed. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was performed to compare OS among patients who received chemotherapy.
We evaluated 1378 patients in the general cohort. Multivariable Cox regression analysis(MVA) in the general cohort revealed that SBRT was significantly associated with improved survival (HR 0.68, p<0.001) along with receipt of chemotherapy (HR 0.63, p <0.001). SBRT patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy compared to CFRT patients (p<0.01). In the chemotherapy subset, of 1096 patients, on MVA, there was a trend in favor of the SBRT group (HR 0.73; p=0.06). A 3:1 PSM analysis on the chemotherapy subset found similar results on MVA with a trend in favor of SBRT (p=0.06).
Patients with T1-2N0M0 SCLC treated with SBRT regimens incorporating chemotherapy had comparable outcomes to concurrent chemoradiotherapy using standard fractionation. Treatment paradigms for T1-2N0M0 SCLC incorporating SBRT warrant further exploration and should incorporate chemotherapy.
本研究旨在利用国家癌症数据库(NCDB)比较接受立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)或传统分割放射治疗(CFRT)的非手术治疗的T1-T2N0M0小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的生存结果。
查询2004年至2015年间患有T1-T2N0M0 SCLC的患者。患者必须接受了根治性SBRT或CFRT(每日或每日两次,45-70 Gy),可联合或不联合化疗。主要结局是总生存期(OS)。还对接受化疗的患者进行了亚组分析。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析以比较接受化疗患者的OS。
我们在总体队列中评估了1378例患者。总体队列中的多变量Cox回归分析(MVA)显示,SBRT与生存率提高显著相关(HR 0.68,p<0.001),同时接受化疗也与生存率提高显著相关(HR 0.63,p<0.001)。与CFRT患者相比,SBRT患者接受化疗的可能性较小(p<0.01)。在化疗亚组的1096例患者中,MVA显示有支持SBRT组的趋势(HR 0.73;p=0.06)。对化疗亚组进行3:1的PSM分析,在MVA中发现了类似结果,有支持SBRT的趋势(p=0.06)。
采用含化疗的SBRT方案治疗的T1-2N0M0 SCLC患者的结局与使用标准分割的同步放化疗相当。纳入SBRT的T1-2N0M0 SCLC的治疗模式值得进一步探索,且应纳入化疗。