Forouzesh Abed, Samadi Foroushani Sadegh, Forouzesh Fatemeh, Zand Eskandar
Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran.
Department of Medicine, Tehran Medical Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Jul 26;10:835. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00835. eCollection 2019.
The prediction of biological targets of bioactive molecules from machine-readable materials can be routinely performed by computational target prediction tools (CTPTs). However, the prediction of biological targets of bioactive molecules from non-digital materials (e.g., printed or handwritten documents) has not been possible due to the complex nature of bioactive molecules and impossibility of employing computations. Improving the target prediction accuracy is the most important challenge for computational target prediction. A minimum structure is identified for each group of neighbor molecules in the proposed method. Each group of neighbor molecules represents a distinct structural class of molecules with the same function in relation to the target. The minimum structure is employed as a query to search for molecules that perfectly satisfy the minimum structure of what is guessed crucial for the targeted activity. The proposed method is based on chemical similarity, but only molecules that perfectly satisfy the minimum structure are considered. Structurally related bioactive molecules found with the same minimum structure were considered as neighbor molecules of the query molecule. The known target of the neighbor molecule is used as a reference for predicting the target of the neighbor molecule with an unknown target. A lot of information is needed to identify the minimum structure, because it is necessary to know which part(s) of the bioactive molecule determines the precise target or targets responsible for the observed phenotype. Therefore, the predicted target based on the minimum structure without employing the statistical significance is considered as a reliable prediction. Since only molecules that perfectly (and not partly) satisfy the minimum structure are considered, the minimum structure can be used without similarity calculations in non-digital materials and with similarity calculations (perfect similarity) in machine-readable materials. Nine tools (PASS online, PPB, SEA, TargetHunter, PharmMapper, ChemProt, HitPick, SuperPred, and SPiDER), which can be used for computational target prediction, are compared with the proposed method for 550 target predictions. The proposed method, SEA, PPB, and PASS online, showed the best quality and quantity for the accurate predictions.
利用计算靶点预测工具(CTPTs)可常规地从机器可读材料中预测生物活性分子的生物学靶点。然而,由于生物活性分子的复杂性以及无法进行计算,从非数字材料(如印刷或手写文档)中预测生物活性分子的生物学靶点一直无法实现。提高靶点预测准确性是计算靶点预测面临的最重要挑战。在所提出的方法中,为每组相邻分子确定了一个最小结构。每组相邻分子代表一类在与靶点相关功能上具有相同功能的独特结构分子。将该最小结构用作查询,以搜索完全满足对靶向活性至关重要的所猜测最小结构的分子。所提出的方法基于化学相似性,但仅考虑完全满足最小结构的分子。发现具有相同最小结构的结构相关生物活性分子被视为查询分子的相邻分子。相邻分子的已知靶点用作预测具有未知靶点的相邻分子靶点的参考。识别最小结构需要大量信息,因为有必要知道生物活性分子的哪些部分决定了导致观察到的表型的精确一个或多个靶点。因此,基于最小结构且不采用统计显著性的预测靶点被视为可靠预测。由于仅考虑完全(而非部分)满足最小结构的分子,所以最小结构可在非数字材料中不进行相似性计算使用,在机器可读材料中进行相似性计算(完全相似性)使用。将可用于计算靶点预测的九种工具(在线PASS、PPB、SEA、TargetHunter、PharmMapper、ChemProt、HitPick、SuperPred和SPiDER)与所提出的方法进行550次靶点预测比较。所提出的方法、SEA、PPB和在线PASS在准确预测方面显示出最佳的质量和数量。