Yale University, School of Management, United States.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Jun;33:86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
Here, we look ahead to a psychology of power that is embedded in societal structures, specifically with regard to the North American context of race, gender, and social class. We argue that studies of power are limited when decoupled from these societal structures of power and we make this argument by examining dominant working definitions and links between power and prosociality. We end with a suggestion that a fully embedded and historical psychological account of social power will require greater constraints on generality, additional descriptive work on the experience of power in everyday life, and methods and samples that bring research on social power out of university spaces and into the places, spaces, and institutions where that power is intertwined.
在这里,我们着眼于一种嵌入社会结构中的权力心理学,特别是针对北美种族、性别和社会阶级的背景。我们认为,当权力研究与这些社会权力结构脱钩时,其研究是有限的,我们通过考察权力与亲社会性之间的主导性工作定义和联系来提出这一观点。最后,我们提出一个建议,即对社会权力进行一个完全嵌入和具有历史意义的心理学解释,将需要对一般性进行更大的限制,对日常生活中权力体验进行更多的描述性工作,并采用将社会权力研究带出大学校园、进入权力交织的场所、空间和机构的方法和样本。