Dion Kenneth L
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004 Jul;75(7 Suppl):C36-43.
The issues of interpersonal and group processes in long-term spacecrews from the perspectives of social and organizational psychology are considered here. A contrast between the Amundsen vs. Scott expeditions to the South Pole 90 yrs. ago highlights the importance of personnel selection and attention to interpersonal and group dynamics in expeditions to extreme and dangerous environments, such as long-term spaceflights today. Under the rubric of personnel selection, some further psychological "select-in" and "select-out" criteria are suggested, among them implicit measures of human motivation, intergroup attitudes ("implicit" and "explicit" measures of prejudice, social dominance orientation, and right-wing authoritarianism), attachment styles, and dispositional hardiness. The situational interview and the idea of "selection for teams," drawn from current advances in organizational psychology, are recommended for selecting members for future spacecrews. Under the rubrics of interpersonal and group processes, the social relations model is introduced as a technique for modeling and understanding interdependence among spacecrew members and partialling out variance in behavioral and perceptual data into actor/perceiver, partner/target, and relationship components. Group cohesion as a multidimensional construct is introduced, along with a consideration of the groupthink phenomenon and its controversial link to cohesion. Group composition issues are raised with examples concerning cultural heterogeneity and gender composition. Cultural value dimensions, especially power distance and individual-collectivism, should be taken into account at both societal and psychological levels in long-term space missions. Finally, intergroup processes and language issues in crews are addressed. The recategorization induction from the common ingroup identity model is recommended as a possible intervention for overcoming and inhibiting intergroup biases within spacecrews and between space- and groundcrews.
本文从社会和组织心理学的角度探讨了长期太空任务中人际和群体过程的问题。90年前阿蒙森与斯科特南极探险队的对比突出了人员选拔以及关注人际和群体动态在极端危险环境探险中的重要性,比如如今的长期太空飞行。在人员选拔方面,提出了一些进一步的心理“入选”和“淘汰”标准,其中包括人类动机的隐性测量、群体间态度(偏见、社会支配取向和右翼威权主义的“隐性”和“显性”测量)、依恋风格和性格韧性。建议采用情境面试和从组织心理学当前进展中借鉴的“团队选拔”理念来为未来的太空任务选拔成员。在人际和群体过程方面,引入社会关系模型作为一种技术,用于建模和理解太空任务成员之间的相互依存关系,并将行为和感知数据的方差分解为行动者/感知者、伙伴/目标和关系成分。介绍了作为多维结构的群体凝聚力,并对群体思维现象及其与凝聚力的争议性联系进行了探讨。通过文化异质性和性别构成的例子提出了群体构成问题。在长期太空任务中,应在社会和心理层面考虑文化价值维度,特别是权力距离和个人主义-集体主义。最后,讨论了太空任务中的群体间过程和语言问题。建议采用共同内群体身份模型中的重新分类诱导作为一种可能的干预措施,以克服和抑制太空任务成员内部以及太空与地面人员之间的群体间偏见。