• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动机类别:社会结构通过注意力机制影响社会类别构建。

Motivated Categories: Social Structures Shape the Construction of Social Categories Through Attentional Mechanisms.

机构信息

University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2023 Nov;27(4):393-413. doi: 10.1177/10888683231172255. Epub 2023 May 22.

DOI:10.1177/10888683231172255
Abstract

Social categories like race and gender often give rise to stereotypes and prejudice, and a great deal of research has focused on how motivations influence these biased beliefs. Here, we focus on potential biases in how these categories are even formed in the first place, suggesting that motivations can influence the very categories people use to group others. We propose that motivations to share schemas with other people and to gain resources shape people's attention to dimensions like race, gender, and age in different contexts. Specifically, people will pay attention to dimensions to the degree that the conclusions produced from using those dimensions align with their motivations. Overall, we suggest that simply examining the downstream effects of social categorization like stereotyping and prejudice is not enough, and that research should look earlier in the process at how and when we form the categories on which those stereotypes are based.

摘要

社会类别,如种族和性别,往往会产生刻板印象和偏见,大量研究集中在动机如何影响这些有偏见的信念。在这里,我们关注的是这些类别最初是如何形成的潜在偏见,表明动机可以影响人们用来对他人进行分组的类别。我们提出,与他人分享图式和获取资源的动机塑造了人们在不同情境下对种族、性别和年龄等维度的注意力。具体来说,人们会关注那些与他们的动机一致的维度,这些维度可以得出结论。总的来说,我们认为仅仅检查刻板印象和偏见等社会分类的下游影响是不够的,研究应该更早地关注我们是如何以及何时形成基于这些刻板印象的类别。

相似文献

1
Motivated Categories: Social Structures Shape the Construction of Social Categories Through Attentional Mechanisms.动机类别:社会结构通过注意力机制影响社会类别构建。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2023 Nov;27(4):393-413. doi: 10.1177/10888683231172255. Epub 2023 May 22.
2
A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice.社会刻板印象与偏见的发展性群体间理论。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2006;34:39-89. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80004-2.
3
The Origins of Social Categorization.社会分类的起源
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;21(7):556-568. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 May 9.
4
Toward an integrative science of social vision in intergroup bias.在群体间偏见的社会视觉综合科学研究中
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jul;102:318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
5
The development and developmental consequences of social essentialism.社会本质主义的发展及其发展后果。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;8(4). doi: 10.1002/wcs.1437. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
6
Self-categorization with a novel mixed-race group moderates automatic social and racial biases.与一个新的混血群体进行自我分类会缓和自动的社会和种族偏见。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;35(3):321-35. doi: 10.1177/0146167208327743. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
7
Prejudice control and interracial relations: the role of motivation to respond without prejudice.偏见控制与跨种族关系:无偏见回应动机的作用。
J Pers. 2009 Oct;77(5):1311-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00583.x. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
8
The social neuroscience of race-based and status-based prejudice.基于种族和地位的偏见的社会神经科学。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Dec;24:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
9
Dynamic interracial/intercultural processes: the role of lay theories of race.动态的种族间/跨文化过程:种族的通俗理论的作用。
J Pers. 2009 Oct;77(5):1283-309. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00582.x. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
10
Complicating race: the relationship between prejudice, race, and social class categorizations.复杂的种族问题:偏见、种族与社会阶层分类之间的关系。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Aug;30(8):972-84. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264751.

引用本文的文献

1
Increased complexity of social category markers leads to diverse rule-based categorizations and reduced intergroup bias.社会类别标记复杂性的增加导致了基于规则的多样化分类,并减少了群体间偏见。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Jul;292(2051):20250659. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.0659. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
Tabula rasa agents display emergent in-group behavior.白板智能体表现出新兴的群体行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 24;122(25):e2319947121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319947121. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
3
The place of the social in psychiatry: from structural determinants to the ecology of mind.

本文引用的文献

1
Thinking Structurally: A Cognitive Framework for Understanding How People Attribute Inequality to Structural Causes.结构思维:理解人们如何将不平等归因于结构性原因的认知框架。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Mar;18(2):259-274. doi: 10.1177/17456916221093593. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
2
The labelled container: Conceptual development of social group representations.标记容器:社会群体代表性的概念发展。
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 7;45:e108. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21001412.
3
Multiculturalism and Colorblindness as Threats to the Self: A Framework for Understanding Dominant and Non-Dominant Group Members' Responses to Interethnic Ideologies.
社会因素在精神病学中的地位:从结构决定因素到心智生态学
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Apr;60(4):771-783. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02772-5. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
多元文化主义和色盲作为对自我的威胁:一个理解主流群体和非主流群体成员对族际意识形态反应的框架。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2022 Nov;26(4):315-341. doi: 10.1177/10888683221093130. Epub 2022 May 27.
4
Globally Inaccurate Stereotypes Can Result From Locally Adaptive Exploration.全球不准确的刻板印象可能源于局部自适应探索。
Psychol Sci. 2022 May;33(5):671-684. doi: 10.1177/09567976211045929. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
5
Through the looking glass: A lens-based account of intersectional stereotyping.透过镜子:基于镜头的交叉刻板印象描述。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Oct;123(4):763-787. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000382. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
6
Avoidance begets avoidance: A computational account of negative stereotype persistence.回避导致回避:消极刻板印象持续存在的计算解释。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Oct;150(10):2078-2099. doi: 10.1037/xge0001037. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
7
Overcoming constraints of the model minority stereotype to advance Asian American health.克服模范少数族裔刻板印象的限制,促进亚裔美国人的健康。
Am Psychol. 2021 May-Jun;76(4):611-626. doi: 10.1037/amp0000799.
8
I ain't no fortunate one: On the motivated denial of class privilege.我不是什么幸运儿:论阶级特权的动机否认。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Dec;119(6):1403-1422. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000240. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
9
The Psychology of Motivated versus Rational Impression Updating.动机驱动与理性更新印象的心理学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Feb;24(2):101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
10
The influence of theoretical knowledge on similarity judgment.理论知识对相似性判断的影响。
Cogn Process. 2020 Feb;21(1):23-32. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00931-0. Epub 2019 Sep 13.