Brainina Khiena, Stozhko Natalia, Vidrevich Marina
Department of physics and chemistry, Ural State University of Economics, 620144 Ekaterinburg, Russia.
Institute of Chemical Technology, Ural Federal University, 620000 Ekaterinburg, Russia.
Antioxidants (Basel). 2019 Aug 9;8(8):297. doi: 10.3390/antiox8080297.
Unreliable terminology and incompatible units of antioxidant activity/concentration expression lead to the failure of antioxidant clinical trials, ambiguity of conclusions about the effect of a chosen therapy in medicine and evaluation of food quality, diet, difficulties using information in monitoring the training process in sports, etc. Many different terms (antiradical activity, antioxidant activity, antioxidant capacity, antioxidant power, antioxidant ability) and methods: Trolox equivalent capacity assay (TEAC), Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power assay (FRAP), Cupric Reducing Antioxidant Capacity assay (CUPRAC), antioxidative activity assay (ABTS), the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), and different options of electrochemical ones) proposed for the determination of antioxidants are described. Possible approaches to the development of this field of science and practice are considered.
抗氧化活性/浓度表达的术语不可靠以及单位不兼容,导致抗氧化剂临床试验失败、医学中所选疗法效果结论的模糊性以及食品质量、饮食评估的困难,在体育训练过程监测中使用信息的困难等。描述了许多不同的术语(抗自由基活性、抗氧化活性、抗氧化能力、抗氧化力、抗氧化能力)和方法:用于测定抗氧化剂的特洛克斯当量能力测定法(TEAC)、铁还原抗氧化能力测定法(FRAP)、铜还原抗氧化能力测定法(CUPRAC)、抗氧化活性测定法(ABTS)、氧自由基吸收能力(ORAC)以及电化学方法的不同选项)。考虑了该科学和实践领域发展的可能途径。