Suppr超能文献

大量身体活动与死亡风险的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Association of high amounts of physical activity with mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

The Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism and the Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2020 Oct;54(20):1195-1201. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100393. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review and analyse studies of high amounts of physical activity and mortality risk in the general population.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria related to follow-up (minimum 2 years), outcome (mortality from all causes, cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD) or coronary heart disease), exposure (eg, a category of >1000 metabolic equivalent of task (MET) min/week), study design (prospective cohort, nested case control or case-cohort) and reports of cases and person years of exposure categories.

INFORMATION SOURCES

Systematic searches were conducted in Embase and Pubmed from database inception to 2 March 2019.

RISK OF BIAS

The quality of the studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

INCLUDED STUDIES

From 31 368 studies identified, 48 were included. Two authors independently extracted outcome estimates and assessed study quality.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) using random effect restricted cubic spline dose-response meta-analyses. Compared with the recommended level of physical activity (750 MET min/week), mortality risk was lower at physical activity levels exceeding the recommendations, at least until 5000 MET min/week for all cause mortality (HR=0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.94) and for CVD mortality (HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.95).

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF EVIDENCE

The strengths of this study include the detailed dose-response analyses, inclusion of 48 studies and examination of sources of heterogeneity. The limitations include the observational nature of the included studies and the inaccurate estimations of amount of physical activity.

INTERPRETATION

Compared with the recommended level, mortality risk was lower at physical activity levels well above the recommended target range. Further, there was no threshold beyond which lifespan was compromised.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42017055727.

摘要

目的

系统地回顾和分析大量身体活动与普通人群死亡率风险的研究。

纳入标准

与随访(至少 2 年)、结局(全因死亡率、癌症死亡率、心血管疾病死亡率或冠心病死亡率)、暴露(如,1000 个代谢当量任务(MET)分钟/周以上的某一类别)、研究设计(前瞻性队列研究、巢式病例对照研究或病例-队列研究)以及报告病例数和暴露类别人年相关的纳入标准。

信息来源

从数据库建立开始到 2019 年 3 月 2 日,在 Embase 和 Pubmed 中进行了系统检索。

偏倚风险

使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。

纳入研究

从确定的 31368 项研究中,纳入了 48 项研究。两位作者独立提取结局估计值并评估研究质量。

结果综合

使用随机效应限制立方样条剂量反应荟萃分析来估计危险比(HRs)。与推荐的体力活动水平(750 MET 分钟/周)相比,体力活动水平超过推荐水平时,死亡率风险较低,至少在 5000 MET 分钟/周时全因死亡率(HR=0.86,95%置信区间 0.78 至 0.94)和心血管疾病死亡率(HR=0.73,95%置信区间 0.56 至 0.95)。

证据的优势和局限性

本研究的优势包括详细的剂量反应分析、纳入 48 项研究以及检查异质性来源。局限性包括纳入研究的观察性质和体力活动量的不准确估计。

解释

与推荐水平相比,体力活动水平远高于推荐目标范围时,死亡率风险较低。此外,没有超过该水平就会缩短寿命的阈值。

注册

PROSPERO CRD42017055727。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验