Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Department of Psychological Sciences, Center for the Promotion of Health in the New England Workplace, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06103, USA; Office Ergonomics Research Committee, Framingham, MA, 01702, USA.
Appl Ergon. 2019 Jul;78:37-53. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
This scoping review examines the effects of sit-stand desks (SSDs) on six domains: behavior (e.g. time sitting and standing), physiological, work performance, psychological, discomfort, and posture. Fifty-three articles met criteria. We determined the percentage of significant results for each domain. Forty-seven studies were experimental trials. Sample sizes ranged from six to 231 participants. Follow-up time-frames ranged from one day to one year. Sixty-one percent of behavioral (24 studies), 37% of physiological (28 studies), 7% of work performance (23 studies), 31% of psychological (11 studies), 43% of discomfort (22 studies), and 18% of posture domain results (4 studies) were significant. We conclude that SSDs effectively change behaviors, but these changes only mildly effect health outcomes. SSDs seem most effective for discomfort and least for productivity. Further study is needed to examine long-term effects, and to determine clinically appropriate dosage and workstation setup.
本范围综述考察了坐站式办公桌 (SSDs) 在六个领域的影响：行为（如坐立时间）、生理、工作绩效、心理、不适和姿势。53 篇文章符合标准。我们确定了每个领域有显著结果的百分比。47 项研究为实验性试验。样本量从 6 人到 231 人不等。随访时间范围从一天到一年。61%的行为学（24 项研究）、37%的生理学（28 项研究）、7%的工作绩效（23 项研究）、31%的心理学（11 项研究）、43%的不适（22 项研究）和 18%的姿势领域（4 项研究）结果有显著意义。我们的结论是，SSDs 可以有效地改变行为，但这些变化对健康结果的影响很小。SSDs 似乎对不适最有效，对生产力最无效。需要进一步研究以检查长期影响，并确定临床适宜的剂量和工作站设置。
