Department of Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 14;9(1):11836. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47968-x.
Skeletal muscle architecture significantly influences the performance capacity of a muscle. A DTI-based method has been recently considered as a new reference standard to validate measurement of muscle structure in vivo. This study sought to quantify muscle architecture parameters such as fascicle length (FL), pennation angle (PA) and muscle thickness (t) in post-stroke patients using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and to quantitatively compare the differences with 2D ultrasonography (US) and DTI. Muscle fascicles were reconstructed to examine the anatomy of the medial gastrocnemius, posterior soleus and tibialis anterior in seven stroke survivors using US- and DTI-based techniques, respectively. By aligning the US and DTI coordinate system, DTI reconstructed muscle fascicles at the same scanning plane of the US data can be identified. The architecture parameters estimated based on two imaging modalities were further compared. Significant differences were observed for PA and t between two methods. Although mean FL was not significantly different, there were considerable intra-individual differences in FL and PA. On the individual level, parameters measured by US agreed poorly with those from DTI in both deep and superficial muscles. The significant differences in muscle parameters we observed suggested that the DTI-based method seems to be a better method to quantify muscle architecture parameters which can provide important information for treatment planning and to personalize a computational muscle model.
骨骼肌结构显著影响肌肉的性能。基于弥散张量成像(DTI)的方法最近被认为是一种新的参考标准,用于验证活体肌肉结构的测量。本研究旨在使用弥散张量成像(DTI)量化脑卒中患者的肌肉结构参数,如肌束长度(FL)、肌纤维角度(PA)和肌肉厚度(t),并通过二维超声(US)和 DTI 进行定量比较。使用 US 和 DTI 技术分别重建了 7 名脑卒中幸存者的内侧比目鱼肌、后比目鱼肌和胫骨前肌的肌束,以检查其解剖结构。通过对齐 US 和 DTI 坐标系,可以识别出在 US 数据相同扫描平面上的 DTI 重建的肌束。进一步比较了两种成像方式估计的结构参数。两种方法之间观察到 PA 和 t 存在显著差异。虽然平均 FL 没有显著差异,但 FL 和 PA 在个体间存在相当大的差异。在个体水平上,US 测量的参数与深部和浅部肌肉的 DTI 结果一致性较差。我们观察到的肌肉参数的显著差异表明,基于 DTI 的方法似乎是量化肌肉结构参数的更好方法,可为治疗计划提供重要信息,并为计算肌肉模型提供个性化服务。