Kohler Marina, Devaux Caroline, Grigulis Karl, Leitinger Georg, Lavorel Sandra, Tappeiner Ulrike
Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, Université Grenoble Alpes, CS 40700, 38058 Grenoble cedex 9, France.
Ecol Indic. 2019 May 10;73:118-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Ecosystems provide a variety of ecosystem services (ES), which act as key linkages between social and ecological systems. ES respond spatially and temporally to abiotic and biotic variation, and to management. Thus, resistant and resilient ES provision is expected to remain within a stable range when facing disturbances. In this study, generic indicators to evaluate resistance, potential resilience and capacity for transformation of ES provision are developed and their relevance demonstrated for a mountain grassland system. Indicators are based on plant trait composition (i.e. functional composition) and abiotic parameters determining ES provision at community, meta-community and landscape scales. First the resistance of an ES is indicated by its normal operating range characterized by observed values under current conditions. Second its resilience is assessed by its potential operating range - under hypotheses of reassembly from the community's species pool. Third its transformation potential is assessed for reassembly at meta-community and landscape scales. Using a state-and-transition model, possible management-related transitions between mountain grassland states were identified, and indicators calculated for two provisioning and two regulating ES. Overall, resilience properties varied across individual ES, supporting a focus on resilience of specific ES. The resilience potential of the two provisioning services was greater than for the two regulating services, both being linked to functional complementarity within communities. We also found high transformation potential reflecting functional redundancy among communities within each meta-community, and across meta-communities in the landscape. Presented indicators are promising for the projection of future ES provision and the identification of management options under environmental change.
生态系统提供多种生态系统服务(ES),这些服务是社会与生态系统之间的关键联系。生态系统服务在空间和时间上对非生物和生物变化以及管理做出响应。因此,在面对干扰时,预期抗性和恢复力强的生态系统服务供给将保持在稳定范围内。在本研究中,开发了用于评估生态系统服务供给的抗性、潜在恢复力和转化能力的通用指标,并证明了它们对山地草原系统的相关性。指标基于植物性状组成(即功能组成)和在群落、集合群落及景观尺度上决定生态系统服务供给的非生物参数。首先,一种生态系统服务的抗性由其正常运行范围表示,该范围以当前条件下的观测值为特征。其次,其恢复力通过其潜在运行范围进行评估——在从群落物种库重新组装的假设下。第三,评估其在集合群落和景观尺度上重新组装的转化潜力。使用状态和转换模型,确定了山地草原状态之间可能的与管理相关的转换,并计算了两种供给性和两种调节性生态系统服务的指标。总体而言,恢复力特性因个体生态系统服务而异,支持关注特定生态系统服务的恢复力。两种供给性服务的恢复力潜力大于两种调节性服务,两者均与群落内的功能互补性相关。我们还发现了较高的转化潜力,这反映了每个集合群落内以及景观中各集合群落之间群落的功能冗余。所提出的指标对于预测未来生态系统服务供给以及确定环境变化下的管理选项很有前景。