Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Cirad, University of Montpellier, Montpellier 34098, France.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 16;375(1794):20190119. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0119. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
Ecosystems can sustain social adaptation to environmental change by protecting people from climate change effects and providing options for sustaining material and non-material benefits as ecological structure and functions transform. Along adaptation pathways, people navigate the trade-offs between different ecosystem contributions to adaptation, or adaptation services (AS), and can enhance their synergies and co-benefits as environmental change unfolds. Understanding trade-offs and co-benefits of AS is therefore essential to support social adaptation and requires analysing how people co-produce AS. We analysed co-production along the three steps of the ecosystem cascade: (i) ecosystem management; (ii) mobilization; and (iii) appropriation, social access and appreciation. Using five exemplary case studies across socio-ecosystems and continents, we show how five broad mechanisms already active for current ecosystem services can enhance co-benefits and minimize trade-offs between AS: (1) traditional and multi-functional land/sea management targeting ecological resilience; (2) pro-active management for ecosystem transformation; (3) co-production of novel services in landscapes without compromising other services; (4) collective governance of all co-production steps; and (5) feedbacks from appropriation, appreciation of and social access to main AS. We conclude that knowledge and recognition of co-production mechanisms will enable pro-active management and governance for collective adaptation to ecosystem transformation. This article is part of the theme issue 'Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions'.
生态系统可以通过保护人们免受气候变化的影响,并为维持物质和非物质利益提供选择,从而使生态系统结构和功能发生转变,从而支持社会适应环境变化。在适应途径中,人们在不同的生态系统对适应的贡献之间做出权衡,即适应服务(AS),并可以随着环境变化的展开增强它们的协同作用和共同效益。因此,了解 AS 的权衡和共同效益对于支持社会适应至关重要,并且需要分析人们如何共同生产 AS。我们沿着生态系统级联的三个步骤分析了共同生产:(i)生态系统管理;(ii)动员;和(iii)占用、社会获取和欣赏。使用跨越社会生态系统和各大洲的五个示例案例研究,我们展示了当前生态系统服务中已经活跃的五种广泛机制如何增强 AS 的共同效益并最小化权衡:(1)针对生态弹性的传统和多功能土地/海洋管理;(2)针对生态系统转变的积极管理;(3)在不损害其他服务的情况下共同生产新型服务;(4)所有共同生产步骤的集体治理;以及(5)从占用、欣赏和社会获取主要 AS 的反馈。我们得出结论,共同生产机制的知识和认识将使积极管理和集体适应生态系统转变的治理成为可能。本文是“气候变化与生态系统:威胁、机遇与解决方案”主题特刊的一部分。