• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

华盛顿州和华盛顿特区安全网医疗系统患者的移动健康技术知识与实践

Mobile Health Technology Knowledge and Practices Among Patients of Safety-Net Health Systems in Washington State and Washington, DC.

作者信息

Laing Sharon S, Alsayid Muhammad, Ocampo Carlota, Baugh Stacey

机构信息

Nursing and Healthcare Leadership Program, University of Washington Tacoma, Tacoma, WA.

Health Services Department, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2018 Jul 30;5(3):204-217. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1622. eCollection 2018 Summer.

DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.1622
PMID:31414005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6664329/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Mobile health technology (mHealth) can reduce health disparities, but research on the health behaviors of low-income patients is needed. This study evaluates mHealth knowledge and practices of low-resource safety-net patients.

METHODS

We administered a 47-item questionnaire to 164 low-income patients accessing services at community health centers in the state of Washington and Washington, DC. Predictor variables included demographic factors: age, race, ethnicity, income. Outcome variables were smartphone knowledge (smartphones as a wellness tool), medical app knowledge (availability of medical-based apps), smartphone practices (ever used smartphones for wellness), health apps practices (ever used health-based apps), and medical apps practices (ever used medical-based apps). Multivariate logistic regression assessed relationships between predictor and outcome variables.

RESULTS

Mean age was 35.2 years (median: 34), and study cohort (N=159) consisted of mostly women (68%), white race (36%), and income of <$20,000/year (63%). Outcomes: 71% and 58% reported knowledge of using smartphones for wellness and knowledge of medical apps, respectively; 76% used smartphones for wellness, with adults 50+ years of age significantly less likely than younger adults (odds ratio [OR]: 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-0.99); 48% used health apps, with adults 50+ years of age less likely than younger adults (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-0.99) and respondents earning <$20,000/year less likely than higher earners (OR: 3.13, 95% CI: 1.02-9.57); and 58% used medical apps, with Hispanics/Latinos significantly more likely than non-Hispanics/Latinos (OR: 6.38, 95% CI: 1.04-39.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Safety-net patients use mobile devices for health promotion. Age and income are important predictive factors, suggesting a more tailored design of the technology is required for broad engagement and health equity.

摘要

目的

移动健康技术(mHealth)可减少健康差距,但仍需对低收入患者的健康行为进行研究。本研究评估了资源匮乏的安全网患者的移动健康知识与实践情况。

方法

我们对华盛顿州及华盛顿特区社区卫生中心的164名低收入患者进行了一项包含47个项目的问卷调查。预测变量包括人口统计学因素:年龄、种族、族裔、收入。结果变量包括智能手机知识(将智能手机作为健康工具)、医疗应用程序知识(基于医疗的应用程序的可用性)、智能手机使用情况(是否曾使用智能手机促进健康)、健康应用程序使用情况(是否曾使用基于健康的应用程序)以及医疗应用程序使用情况(是否曾使用基于医疗的应用程序)。多变量逻辑回归分析评估了预测变量与结果变量之间的关系。

结果

平均年龄为35.2岁(中位数:34岁),研究队列(N = 159)主要由女性(68%)、白人(36%)以及年收入低于20,000美元(63%)的人群组成。结果如下:分别有71%和58%的患者报告了解使用智能手机促进健康以及了解医疗应用程序;76%的患者使用智能手机促进健康,50岁及以上成年人使用智能手机促进健康的可能性显著低于年轻成年人(优势比[OR]:0.94,95%置信区间[CI]:0.88 - 0.99);48%的患者使用健康应用程序,50岁及以上成年人使用健康应用程序的可能性低于年轻成年人(OR:0.95,95% CI:0.91 - 0.99),年收入低于20,000美元的受访者使用健康应用程序的可能性低于高收入者(OR:3.13,95% CI:1.02 - 9.57);58%的患者使用医疗应用程序,西班牙裔/拉丁裔使用医疗应用程序的可能性显著高于非西班牙裔/拉丁裔(OR:6.38,95% CI:1.04 - 39.02)。

结论

安全网患者使用移动设备促进健康。年龄和收入是重要的预测因素,这表明需要对技术进行更具针对性的设计,以实现广泛参与和健康公平。

相似文献

1
Mobile Health Technology Knowledge and Practices Among Patients of Safety-Net Health Systems in Washington State and Washington, DC.华盛顿州和华盛顿特区安全网医疗系统患者的移动健康技术知识与实践
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2018 Jul 30;5(3):204-217. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1622. eCollection 2018 Summer.
2
Physical Activity Support Predicts Safety-Net Patients' Digital Health-Care Engagement: Implications for Patient Care Delivery.体力活动支持可预测安全网患者的数字医疗保健参与度:对患者护理提供的影响。
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Mar;34(3):311-315. doi: 10.1177/0890117119894508. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
3
Smartphone ownership and perspectives on health apps among a vulnerable population in East Harlem, New York.纽约东哈莱姆区弱势群体的智能手机拥有情况及对健康应用程序的看法
Mhealth. 2018 Aug 8;4:31. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.07.02. eCollection 2018.
4
Use of Mobile Health Applications for Health-Seeking Behavior Among US Adults.移动健康应用在美国成年人健康寻求行为中的应用
J Med Syst. 2016 Jun;40(6):153. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0492-7. Epub 2016 May 4.
5
Digital technology ownership, usage, and factors predicting downloading health apps among caucasian, filipino, korean, and latino americans: the digital link to health survey.数字技术拥有、使用情况以及预测白人、菲律宾人、韩国人和拉丁裔美国人下载健康应用程序的因素:健康关联数字化调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Oct 22;2(4):e43. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3710.
6
Using Smartphones and Health Apps to Change and Manage Health Behaviors: A Population-Based Survey.利用智能手机和健康应用程序改变和管理健康行为:一项基于人群的调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 5;19(4):e101. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6838.
7
Use of eHealth and mHealth technology by persons with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者使用电子健康和移动健康技术。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
8
Evaluation of mHealth Apps for Diverse, Low-Income Patient Populations: Framework Development and Application Study.针对不同低收入患者群体的移动健康应用程序评估:框架开发与应用研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Feb 11;6(2):e29922. doi: 10.2196/29922.
9
Mobile Phone Ownership, Health Apps, and Tablet Use in US Adults With a Self-Reported History of Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study.美国高血压患者中手机拥有率、健康类应用程序使用情况以及平板电脑使用情况:横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 14;7(1):e12228. doi: 10.2196/12228.
10
Use of Smartphone Health Apps Among Patients Aged 18 to 69 Years in Primary Care: Population-Based Cross-sectional Survey.基层医疗中18至69岁患者使用智能手机健康应用程序的情况:基于人群的横断面调查。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):e34882. doi: 10.2196/34882.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Inequalities in Mobile Health Utilization Across Phases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.了解移动健康在各阶段使用中的不平等现象:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e71349. doi: 10.2196/71349.
2
Integrating Patient-Generated Health Data from Mobile Devices into Electronic Health Records: Best Practice Recommendations by the IFCC Committee on Mobile Health and Bioengineering in Laboratory Medicine (C-MHBLM).将移动设备上患者生成的健康数据整合到电子健康记录中:国际临床化学与检验医学联合会移动健康与实验室医学生物工程委员会(C-MHBLM)的最佳实践建议
EJIFCC. 2024 Dec 30;35(4):324-328. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Usability and Quality Evaluation of the "E- Midwife" Mobile Application for Nurse-Midwives in Obstetric Complications: A Randomized Controlled Trial.“E- 助产士”移动应用在产科并发症中用于助产士的可用性和质量评估:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2023 Oct;11(4):247-256. doi: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2023.98777.2264.
4
Technology-Based Obesity Prevention Interventions Among Hispanic Adolescents in the United States: Scoping Review.美国西班牙裔青少年中基于技术的肥胖预防干预措施:范围综述
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Nov 4;5(4):e39261. doi: 10.2196/39261.
5
Predictors of Adherence to Cancer-Related mHealth Apps in Cancer Patients Undergoing Oncological or Follow-Up Treatment-A Scoping Review.癌症患者接受肿瘤或随访治疗时,影响癌症相关移动医疗应用依从性的因素:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 21;19(20):13689. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013689.
6
Social Media, Digital Health Literacy, and Digital Ethics in the Light of Health Equity.社交媒体、数字健康素养与健康公平视野下的数字伦理
Yearb Med Inform. 2022 Aug;31(1):82-87. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742503. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
7
Conditions for the Successful Integration of an eHealth Tool "StopBlues" Into Community-Based Interventions in France: Results From a Multiple Correspondence Analysis.条件的成功整合电子健康工具“StopBlues”纳入社区为基础的干预措施在法国:结果从一个多元对应分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 22;24(4):e30218. doi: 10.2196/30218.
8
An investigation of the use of app technology to support clinical management of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML).应用程序技术在慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者临床管理中的应用研究。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2023 Jul;29(5):1083-1093. doi: 10.1177/10781552221090904. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
9
Mobile app development in health research: pitfalls and solutions.健康研究中的移动应用程序开发:陷阱与解决方案。
Mhealth. 2021 Apr 20;7:32. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-19-263. eCollection 2021.
10
Influencing Factors of Acceptance and Use Behavior of Mobile Health Application Users: Systematic Review.移动健康应用用户接受度和使用行为的影响因素:系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 22;9(3):357. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030357.

本文引用的文献

1
Mobile Health (mHealth) Technology for the Management of Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia: Slow Start but Loads of Potential.移动医疗(mHealth)技术在高血压和高脂血症管理中的应用:缓慢起步但潜力巨大。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017 Mar;19(3):12. doi: 10.1007/s11883-017-0649-y.
2
Usability of Commercially Available Mobile Applications for Diverse Patients.面向不同患者的市售移动应用程序的可用性
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Dec;31(12):1417-1426. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3771-6. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
3
Assessing the Effect of mHealth Interventions in Improving Maternal and Neonatal Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.评估移动健康干预措施对改善低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇和新生儿护理的效果:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2016 May 4;11(5):e0154664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154664. eCollection 2016.
4
MoodHacker Mobile Web App With Email for Adults to Self-Manage Mild-to-Moderate Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial.用于成年人自我管理轻度至中度抑郁的 MoodHacker 移动网络应用程序及电子邮件:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jan 26;4(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4231.
5
Mobile health and patient engagement in the safety net: a survey of community health centers and clinics.移动健康与安全网中的患者参与度:社区健康中心与诊所的一项调查
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 May;9:1-9.
6
Use of mobile health (mHealth) tools by primary care patients in the WWAMI region Practice and Research Network (WPRN).WWAMI地区实践与研究网络(WPRN)中初级保健患者对移动健康(mHealth)工具的使用情况。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;27(6):780-8. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140108.
7
Assessing the impact of mHealth interventions in low- and middle-income countries--what has been shown to work?评估移动健康干预措施在低收入和中等收入国家的影响——哪些措施已被证明有效?
Glob Health Action. 2014 Oct 27;7:25606. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.25606. eCollection 2014.
8
mHealth resources to strengthen health programs.移动医疗资源以加强卫生项目。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014 Feb 11;2(1):130-1. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00013. eCollection 2014 Feb.
9
Using the lives saved tool (LiST) to model mHealth impact on neonatal survival in resource-limited settings.使用生命拯救工具(LiST)来模拟移动健康对资源有限环境下新生儿生存的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 11;9(7):e102224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102224. eCollection 2014.
10
The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use.低收入居家老年人中的数字鸿沟:互联网使用模式、电子健康素养以及对计算机/互联网使用的态度。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 May 2;15(5):e93. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2645.