• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Utilization of Rehabilitation Services in Stroke: A Study Utilizing the Health and Retirement Study With Linked Medicare Claims Data.脑卒中患者的康复服务利用情况研究:利用健康与退休研究及与之关联的医疗保险索赔数据进行的研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Dec;100(12):2244-2250. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
2
Examining the Association Between Comorbidity Indexes and Functional Status in Hospitalized Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries.探究住院医疗保险按服务付费受益人的合并症指数与功能状态之间的关联。
Phys Ther. 2016 Feb;96(2):232-40. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150039. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
3
Cardiovascular Health and Healthcare Utilization and Expenditures Among Medicare Beneficiaries: The REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study.医疗保险受益人的心血管健康、医疗服务利用及支出情况:中风地理和种族差异原因(REGARDS)研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Feb 1;6(2):e005106. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005106.
4
Assessment of Differences in Inpatient Rehabilitation Services for Length of Stay and Health Outcomes Between US Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries.评估美国医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险受益人在住院康复服务方面的住院时间和健康结果差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201204. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1204.
5
Variation in Hospital-Based Rehabilitation Services Among Patients With Ischemic Stroke in the United States.美国缺血性脑卒中患者住院康复服务的差异。
Phys Ther. 2019 May 1;99(5):494-506. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz014.
6
Comparing post-acute rehabilitation use, length of stay, and outcomes experienced by Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with hip fracture in the United States: A secondary analysis of administrative data.比较美国 Medicare 按服务收费和 Medicare Advantage 受益人与髋部骨折相关的康复使用、住院时间和康复结局:基于行政数据的二次分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 26;15(6):e1002592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002592. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
Persistent Disparities in Medicare's Annual Wellness Visit Utilization.医疗保险年度体检利用的持续差异。
Med Care. 2019 Dec;57(12):984-989. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001229.
8
High-Need Phenotypes in Medicare Beneficiaries: Drivers of Variation in Utilization and Outcomes.医疗保险受益人的高需求表型:利用和结果变化的驱动因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jan;68(1):70-77. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16146. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
9
The association between the supply of select nonpharmacologic providers for pain and use of nonpharmacologic pain management services and initial opioid prescribing patterns for Medicare beneficiaries with persistent musculoskeletal pain.在患有持续性肌肉骨骼疼痛的 Medicare 受益人群中,选择非药物治疗提供者的供应情况与非药物性疼痛管理服务的使用情况与初始阿片类药物处方模式之间存在关联。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr;56(2):275-288. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13561. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
10
Is Profit Status of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities Independently Associated With 30-Day Unplanned Hospital Readmission for Medicare Beneficiaries?营利性康复医疗机构与医疗保险受益人 30 天内非计划性再住院是否独立相关?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Mar;99(3):598-602.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Participation and Its Association With Health Among Community-Dwelling Adults With Chronic Stroke.社区居住的慢性中风成年人的参与及其与健康的关系。
Am J Occup Ther. 2023 Nov 1;77(6). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2023.050255.

本文引用的文献

1
Support service utilization and out-of-pocket payments for health services in a population-based sample of adults with neurological conditions.基于人群的神经系统疾病成年样本中卫生服务的支持性服务利用情况及自付费用
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0192911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192911. eCollection 2018.
2
Addressing the Evidence Gap in Stroke Rehabilitation for Complex Patients: A Preliminary Research Agenda.解决复杂患者脑卒中康复中的证据空白:初步研究议程。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jun;99(6):1232-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.488. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
3
Physical and Occupational Therapy From the Acute to Community Setting After Stroke: Predictors of Use, Continuity of Care, and Timeliness of Care.物理治疗和职业治疗:卒中后从急性期到社区环境的应用:使用的预测因素、连续护理和护理及时性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jun;99(6):1077-1089.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
4
Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.《成人中风康复与恢复指南:美国心脏协会/美国中风协会给医疗保健专业人员的指南》
Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):e98-e169. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098. Epub 2016 May 4.
5
Association of Rehabilitation Intensity for Stroke and Risk of Hospital Readmission.中风康复强度与再次入院风险的关联
Phys Ther. 2015 Dec;95(12):1660-7. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140610. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
6
Patterns of post-acute health care utilization after a severe traumatic brain injury: Results from the PariS-TBI cohort.
Brain Inj. 2015;29(6):701-8. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1004646. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
7
Measures of multimorbidity and morbidity burden for use in primary care and community settings: a systematic review and guide.用于初级保健和社区环境的多种疾病和发病负担的衡量标准:系统评价和指南。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;10(2):134-41. doi: 10.1370/afm.1363.
8
A systematic review of validated methods for identifying cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack using administrative data.使用行政数据识别脑血管意外或短暂性脑缺血发作的验证方法的系统评价。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jan;21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):100-28. doi: 10.1002/pds.2312.
9
Long-term outcome poststroke: predictors of activity limitation and participation restriction.脑卒中后长期预后:活动受限和参与受限的预测因素。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;92(11):1802-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.014.
10
Racial-ethnic disparities in stroke care: the American experience: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.种族和民族差异在卒中护理中的表现:美国经验:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会向医疗保健专业人员的声明。
Stroke. 2011 Jul;42(7):2091-116. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182213e24. Epub 2011 May 26.

脑卒中患者的康复服务利用情况研究:利用健康与退休研究及与之关联的医疗保险索赔数据进行的研究。

Utilization of Rehabilitation Services in Stroke: A Study Utilizing the Health and Retirement Study With Linked Medicare Claims Data.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Dec;100(12):2244-2250. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.017
PMID:31421093
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7739196/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who used poststroke rehabilitation services and identified the strongest predictors of utilization after the initial stroke care episode.

DESIGN

Pooled, cross-sectional design using data from 1998 to 2010 from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) with linked Medicare claims data.

SETTING

NA.

PARTICIPANTS

Stroke survivors who were Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries and participated in the HRS were included (N=515).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Utilization of rehabilitation services up to 10 years poststroke was the primary outcome with logistic regression used to predict utilization. Covariates included demographic factors, baseline functional status, health conditions, personal lifestyle factors, and social support.

RESULTS

Rehabilitation service utilization was 21.6%, 6.8%, 15.8%, 16.5%, and <16% in years 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10, respectively. Age was the primary factor predicting use of rehabilitation in the first 10 years poststroke (odds ratio: 1.14; P=.001). Recurrent stroke (odds ratio: 1.64; P=.051) was also significantly associated with utilization, whereas unspecified incident stroke at incident trended toward significance (odds ratio: 2.17; P=.077). None of the other factors was a significant predictor of participation in rehabilitation services in this period.

CONCLUSION

A small number of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who are stroke survivors utilize rehabilitation services in the first 10 years poststroke. Of those who do, age is the primary driver of utilization. We analyzed a multitude of factors that might influence utilization, but other factors not available in these data also need to be explored.

摘要

目的

描述使用脑卒中后康复服务的医疗保险按服务项目付费受益人,并确定初始脑卒中护理后使用服务的最强预测因素。

设计

使用 1998 年至 2010 年健康与退休研究(HRS)的数据和链接的医疗保险索赔数据进行的汇总、横截面设计。

地点

无。

参与者

纳入了医疗保险按服务项目付费受益人和参加 HRS 的脑卒中幸存者(N=515)。

主要观察指标

脑卒中后 10 年内康复服务的使用情况是主要结局,采用逻辑回归预测使用情况。协变量包括人口统计学因素、基线功能状态、健康状况、个人生活方式因素和社会支持。

结果

康复服务的使用率分别为第 2、4、6、8 和 10 年的 21.6%、6.8%、15.8%、16.5%和<16%。年龄是脑卒中后 10 年内使用康复的主要因素(优势比:1.14;P<.001)。复发性脑卒中(优势比:1.64;P=.051)也与使用率显著相关,而未明确说明的脑卒中在发病时呈趋势(优势比:2.17;P=.077)。在这段时间内,其他因素均不是参加康复服务的显著预测因素。

结论

少数医疗保险按服务项目付费的脑卒中幸存者在脑卒中后 10 年内使用康复服务。在使用的人群中,年龄是使用率的主要驱动因素。我们分析了许多可能影响使用的因素,但也需要探索这些数据中未包含的其他因素。