Kazimirova Alena, Baranokova Magdalena, Staruchova Marta, Drlickova Martina, Volkovova Katarina, Dusinska Maria
Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Slovak Medical University, Limbova 12, 833 03, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Slovak Medical University, Limbova 12, 833 03, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2019 Jul;843:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 2.
The genotoxicity of TiO nanoparticles (NPs) was assessed with the cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay in TK6 lymphoblastoid cells, lymphocytes from human volunteers, and bone marrow erythrocytes from rats exposed in vivo; and with the comet assay (detecting both strand breaks and oxidised purines) in human and rat peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). NPs were dispersed using three different methods giving different size distribution and stability. On average, TiO NPs caused no increase in micronuclei in TK6 cells, rat bone marrow erythrocytes or human lymphocytes (though lymphocytes from 3 out of 13 human subjects showed significant increases). PBMCs from rats treated in vivo with a single dose of NPs dispersed by a method with low agglomeration showed an increase in strand breaks after 1 day. TiO NPs dispersed in a stable, non-agglomerated state induced DNA strand breaks at 75 μg/cm after 4 h exposure of human PBMCs and at 15 μg/cm and 75 μg/cm after 24 h exposure, but no increase in DNA oxidation was seen. Overall, NPs in an agglomerated state did not cause DNA damage. However, at the individual level, significant increases in strand breaks were seen in PBMCs from most of the volunteers. Cells from one volunteer showed positive effects in all conditions and both tests, while cells from another volunteer appeared to be completely resitant to TiO NPs. The implication is that some individuals may be more sensitive than others to effects of this nanomaterial. Differences seen in results obtained with the micronucleus and the comet assay may be due to the mechanisms underlying the genotoxic effects of TiO NPs and the different endpoints represented by the two assays.
采用胞质分裂阻滞微核(CBMN)试验,在TK6淋巴母细胞、人类志愿者的淋巴细胞以及体内暴露的大鼠骨髓红细胞中评估二氧化钛纳米颗粒(TiO NPs)的遗传毒性;并采用彗星试验(检测链断裂和氧化嘌呤),在人类和大鼠外周血单个核细胞(PBMCs)中评估其遗传毒性。使用三种不同方法分散纳米颗粒,从而得到不同的粒径分布和稳定性。平均而言,TiO NPs不会使TK6细胞、大鼠骨髓红细胞或人类淋巴细胞中的微核增加(尽管13名人类受试者中有3人的淋巴细胞显示出显著增加)。用低团聚方法分散的单剂量纳米颗粒对大鼠进行体内处理后,大鼠的PBMCs在1天后链断裂增加。在人类PBMCs暴露4小时后,以稳定、非团聚状态分散的TiO NPs在75μg/cm时诱导DNA链断裂,暴露24小时后在15μg/cm和75μg/cm时诱导DNA链断裂,但未观察到DNA氧化增加。总体而言,团聚状态的纳米颗粒不会导致DNA损伤。然而,在个体水平上,大多数志愿者的PBMCs中链断裂显著增加。一名志愿者的细胞在所有条件和两种试验中均显示出阳性效应,而另一名志愿者的细胞似乎对TiO NPs完全耐受。这意味着一些个体可能比其他个体对这种纳米材料的影响更敏感。微核试验和彗星试验结果的差异可能是由于TiO NPs遗传毒性作用的潜在机制以及两种试验所代表的不同终点所致。