Key Laboratory of Agricultural Informatization Standardization, Ministry of Agriculture, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China; College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, 100083, Beijing, China.
School of Sport Social Science, Shandong Sport University, 250102, Jinan, China; College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, 100083, Beijing, China.
Life Sci Space Res (Amst). 2019 Aug;22:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.lssr.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
The nutrient delivery system is one of the most important hardware components in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) production in Bio-regenerative Life Support Systems (BLSS) for future long-term space mission. The objective of this study was to investigate the influences of different nutrient delivery systems (aeroponics, hydroponics and porous tube-vermiculite) on the growth, photosynthetic characteristics, antioxidant capacity, biomass yield and quality of tomato during its life cycle. The results showed that the dry weight of aeroponics and porous tube-vermiculite treatment group was 1.95 and 1.93 g/fruit, but the value of hydroponics treatment group was only 1.56 g/fruit. Both tomato photosynthesis and stomatal conductance maximized at the development stage and then decreased later in senescent leaves. At the initial stage and the development stage, POD activities in the aeroponics treatment were higher than other two treatments, reached 3.6 U/mg prot and 4.6 U/mg prot, respectively. The fresh yield 431.3 g/plant of hydroponics treatment group was lower. At the same time, there were no significant differences among nutrient delivery systems in the per fruit fresh mass, which was 14.2-17.5 g/fruit.
在用于未来长期空间任务的生物再生生命支持系统 (BLSS) 中,养分输送系统是番茄 (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) 生产中最重要的硬件组件之一。本研究旨在研究不同养分输送系统(气培、水培和多孔管-蛭石)对番茄生命周期中生长、光合特性、抗氧化能力、生物量产量和品质的影响。结果表明,气培和多孔管-蛭石处理组的干重分别为 1.95 和 1.93 g/果实,但水培处理组的干重仅为 1.56 g/果实。番茄光合作用和气孔导度均在发育阶段达到最大值,然后在衰老叶片中降低。在初始阶段和发育阶段,气培处理中的 POD 活性高于其他两种处理,分别达到 3.6 U/mg prot 和 4.6 U/mg prot。水培处理组的鲜产量 431.3 g/株较低。同时,在果实鲜重方面,三种养分输送系统之间没有显著差异,均为 14.2-17.5 g/果实。