Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI.
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Jan;45(1):20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
Although aspiration of septic olecranon bursitis is recommended in the literature, no high-level evidence exists to support this practice. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the results of traditional bursal aspiration (TBA) with empirical management without aspiration (EM). We hypothesized that EM of uncomplicated septic olecranon bursitis results in resolution, with fewer chronic draining sinuses and less progression to bursectomy.
We performed a retrospective review of all cases of septic olecranon bursitis seen by the orthopedic surgery department at a single tertiary referral center over a 5-year period. Cases were manually reviewed to determine patient demographics, management, and treatment results. The primary outcome was success of nonsurgical management versus requirement for surgical bursectomy.
Thirty cases of uncomplicated septic olecranon bursitis were identified within the study period. Eleven patients were initially managed with TBA (performed by an emergency or primary care physician prior to orthopedic consultation), resulting in 11 positive cultures. Only 1 of these prompted a change of antibiotic management, and despite this information, 5 patients required a second course of antibiotics for incomplete resolution. Eight of the TBA cases went on to bursectomy. Nineteen patients underwent EM. Sixteen of these cases resolved with a single course of empirical antibiotics, and 3 (16%) cases required a second antibiotic course. One patient had a recurrence of symptoms 2 months after resolution with a single course of empirical antibiotics. This resolved with a second course of oral antibiotics. No patients who underwent EM went on to require bursectomy. The number needed to harm when aspiration was performed was 1.46.
We found EM of uncomplicated septic olecranon bursitis to be effective. Although 1 recurrence did occur in the EM group, no other complications occurred. Empirical management without aspiration may be considered in cases of uncomplicated septic olecranon bursitis.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
尽管文献中推荐抽吸感染性鹰嘴滑囊炎,但尚无高级别证据支持这种做法。本研究旨在回顾性比较传统滑囊抽吸(TBA)与无抽吸经验性治疗(EM)的结果。我们假设,单纯性感染性鹰嘴滑囊炎的 EM 治疗可使炎症消退,慢性窦道形成减少,滑囊切除进展减少。
我们对一家三级转诊中心骨科在 5 年内诊治的所有单纯性感染性鹰嘴滑囊炎病例进行了回顾性分析。通过手动审查确定患者的人口统计学资料、治疗方法和治疗结果。主要结局是手术与非手术管理的成功率。
研究期间共发现 30 例单纯性感染性鹰嘴滑囊炎。11 例患者最初接受 TBA 治疗(在骨科咨询前由急诊或初级保健医生进行),其中 11 例培养阳性。尽管有这些信息,但仅 1 例患者改变了抗生素治疗方案,仍有 5 例患者因不完全缓解而需要第二疗程的抗生素。TBA 组中有 8 例患者进行了滑囊切除术。19 例患者接受 EM 治疗。其中 16 例患者在单一疗程的经验性抗生素治疗后缓解,3 例(16%)患者需要第二疗程的抗生素治疗。1 例患者在接受单一疗程的经验性抗生素治疗缓解后 2 个月出现症状复发。再次接受口服抗生素治疗后缓解。接受 EM 治疗的患者无一例需要滑囊切除术。当进行抽吸时,需要治疗的人数为 1.46。
我们发现单纯性感染性鹰嘴滑囊炎的 EM 治疗是有效的。尽管 EM 组有 1 例复发,但没有其他并发症发生。在单纯性感染性鹰嘴滑囊炎的情况下,可以考虑不进行抽吸的经验性治疗。
类型的研究/证据的水平:治疗性 IV。