Suppr超能文献

通过联邦合格健康中心获得专科护理的障碍与策略:一项范围综述

Barriers and Strategies for Specialty Care Access through Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Nakamura Yumiko, Laberge Maude, Davis Andrew, Formoso Agatha

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30(3):910-933. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2019.0064.

Abstract

Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) provide health care to vulnerable patients with limited resources. We conducted a scoping review on barriers to specialized care and strategies implemented by FQHCs. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Health Business FULLTEXT, and Web of Science databases. Barriers and success measures were categorized based on the Donabedian framework of structure-process-outcome. We conducted a thematic analysis of identified strategies using Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping reviews. Across 19 articles, the most common patient-level barriers were cost and insurance status. The most common system-level barriers were wait time and office accessibility. Six themes emerged from the analysis of strategies, identified across 46 articles: 1) virtual consults, 2) substitution, 3) referral coordinators, 4) network-building, 5) on-site specialty care, and 6) algorithmic screening. Strategies to increase specialty care access via FQHCs do not necessarily align with the most commonly documented barriers. Instead, strategies are highly dependent on clinic context.

摘要

联邦合格医疗中心(FQHCs)为资源有限的弱势患者提供医疗服务。我们对FQHCs实施的专科护理障碍和策略进行了一项范围审查。我们检索了PubMed、CINAHL、Health Business FULLTEXT和Web of Science数据库。障碍和成功指标根据结构-过程-结果的唐纳贝迪安框架进行分类。我们使用阿克西和奥马利的范围审查框架对已确定的策略进行了主题分析。在19篇文章中,最常见的患者层面障碍是成本和保险状况。最常见的系统层面障碍是等待时间和办公地点的可达性。对46篇文章中确定的策略进行分析后出现了六个主题:1)虚拟咨询,2)替代,3)转诊协调员,4)网络建设,5)现场专科护理,6)算法筛查。通过FQHCs增加专科护理可及性的策略不一定与最常记录的障碍相一致。相反,策略高度依赖于诊所的具体情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验