Oshita Jumpei, Sakamoto Shigeyuki, Okazaki Takahito, Ishii Daizo, Kurisu Kaoru
Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Feb;26(1):19-25. doi: 10.1177/1591019919869478. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
Bilateral carotid artery stenting (BCAS) is often performed in two stages (staged BCAS) but it is also an option to be performed in one stage (simultaneous BCAS). To confirm the safety of simultaneous BCAS, we retrospectively analyzed perioperative and postoperative course of simultaneous BCAS compared with staged BCAS.
Patients with symptomatic stenosis of ≥50% or asymptomatic stenosis of ≥80% of bilateral carotid arteries underwent BCAS. Procedure time, symptomatic ischemic complications, presence/absence of high-intensity spots on postoperative diffusion-weighted image, duration of postoperative hospital stays and 30 days outcome of patients performed with simultaneous BCAS (group A, 8 patients with 16 stenotic lesions (8 procedures)) were compared with those of staged BCAS (group B, 4 patients with 8 stenotic lesions (8 procedures)).
In groups A and B, procedure time was 146.0 ± 53.8 and 103.5 ± 39.4 min; intraoperative hypotension was observed in 62.5% and 50.0%; postoperative hypotension occurred in 37.5% and 50.0%; diffusion-weighted image showed high-intensity spots in 37.5% and 12.5%; and duration of postoperative hospital stays was 5.1 ± 1.8 and 5.3 ± 2.3 days. No patients suffered symptomatic ischemic complications. In simultaneous BCAS, there was a tendency that procedure time was longer and high-intensity spots on postoperative diffusion-weighted image was more frequent, but there was no increase in symptomatic ischemic complications and duration of hospital stays compared to staged BCAS.
Safety of simultaneous BCAS may not be inferior to staged BCAS. In terms of duration of hospital stays, simultaneous BCAS can be superior to staged BCAS for patients with bilateral carotid artery stenosis.
双侧颈动脉支架置入术(BCAS)通常分两阶段进行(分期BCAS),但也可选择一次性完成(同期BCAS)。为证实同期BCAS的安全性,我们回顾性分析了同期BCAS与分期BCAS的围手术期及术后过程。
双侧颈动脉狭窄≥50%有症状或≥80%无症状的患者接受BCAS。比较同期BCAS组(A组,8例患者16处狭窄病变(8次手术))和分期BCAS组(B组,4例患者8处狭窄病变(8次手术))的手术时间、症状性缺血并发症、术后弥散加权成像上高强度斑点的有无、术后住院时间及30天结局。
A组和B组的手术时间分别为146.0±53.8分钟和103.5±39.4分钟;术中低血压发生率分别为62.5%和50.0%;术后低血压发生率分别为37.5%和50.0%;弥散加权成像显示高强度斑点的比例分别为37.5%和12.5%;术后住院时间分别为5.1±1.8天和5.3±2.3天。无患者发生症状性缺血并发症。同期BCAS中,手术时间有延长趋势,术后弥散加权成像上高强度斑点更常见,但与分期BCAS相比,症状性缺血并发症及住院时间并未增加。
同期BCAS的安全性可能不低于分期BCAS。就住院时间而言,对于双侧颈动脉狭窄患者,同期BCAS可能优于分期BCAS。