Forouzandeh Mahtab, Vazquez Thomas, Nouri Keyvan, Forouzandeh Bahram
J Drugs Dermatol. 2019 Aug 1;18(8):832-834.
While psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and Crohn’s Disease (CD) all share a common central pathogenesis pathway and a wide overlap of treatment regime, discrepancies still exist and are highlighted by the variability in the effectiveness of certain immunomodulating agents. Etanercept, for example, has been shown to be ineffective in CD due to its inability to induce T-cell apoptosis in the intestinal mucosa. CASE: We describe the case of a 37-year-old man with a 20-year history of psoriatic arthritis. The patient presented with abdominal pain, watery diarrhea with mild hematochezia, and a reported 24-pound unintentional weight loss over the past five months. Of note, the patient began treatment with etanercept five months earlier after discontinuation of infliximab for his psoriatic arthritis symptoms. Colonoscopy with terminal ileum intubation revealed active colitis and intestinal biopsy results showed marked ulcerations and non-caseating granulomas, indicative of CD. Etanercept was subsequently discontinued and the patient was started on ustekinumab, leading to remission of both his psoriatic arthritis and new onset CD. DISCUSSION: Because the concurrent existence of psoriatic arthritis and IBD is becoming increasingly appreciated in recent literature, healthcare providers should have a high index of suspicion in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis presenting with unusual intestinal symptoms. Etanercept is intestinally inactive and should be used in caution in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, as it may unmask underlying CD in this predisposed patient population. Dermatologists should also be aware of recent studies suggesting that etanercept directly contributes to the development of CD by altering the inflammatory cytokine milieu. Lastly, ustekinumab was successful in relieving our patient’s cutaneous, joint, and gastrointestinal symptoms and may be considered an effective treatment option in patients suffering from both psoriasis and CD or the paradoxical induction of one disease entity secondary to treatment of the other.
虽然银屑病、银屑病关节炎和克罗恩病(CD)都共享一个共同的核心发病机制途径,并且在治疗方案上有广泛重叠,但差异仍然存在,某些免疫调节药物有效性的变异性凸显了这些差异。例如,由于依那西普无法诱导肠黏膜中的T细胞凋亡,已证明其在CD治疗中无效。
我们描述了一名37岁男性患者的病例,他有20年的银屑病关节炎病史。患者出现腹痛、伴有轻度便血的水样腹泻,并且据报告在过去五个月中无意体重减轻了24磅。值得注意的是,该患者在因银屑病关节炎症状停用英夫利昔单抗五个月后开始使用依那西普治疗。结肠镜检查及回肠末端插管显示活动性结肠炎,肠道活检结果显示有明显溃疡和非干酪样肉芽肿,提示为CD。随后停用依那西普,患者开始使用乌司奴单抗治疗,其银屑病关节炎和新发性CD均得到缓解。
由于银屑病关节炎和炎症性肠病(IBD)的并存现象在最近的文献中越来越受到重视,医疗保健提供者对于患有银屑病和银屑病关节炎且出现异常肠道症状的患者应保持高度怀疑。依那西普在肠道内无活性,在患有银屑病和银屑病关节炎的患者中应谨慎使用,因为它可能会在这种易感患者群体中揭示潜在的CD。皮肤科医生也应了解最近的研究,这些研究表明依那西普通过改变炎症细胞因子环境直接促成CD的发展。最后,乌司奴单抗成功缓解了我们患者的皮肤、关节和胃肠道症状,对于同时患有银屑病和CD或因治疗另一种疾病而 paradoxically诱导出一种疾病实体的患者,乌司奴单抗可被视为一种有效的治疗选择。 (注:“paradoxically”这里可能是“矛盾地”意思,但结合语境感觉表述有点奇怪,可再结合专业知识确认下是否准确。)