文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

多节段颈椎前路融合术后邻近节段活动:零切迹锚定式 spacer 或钢板固定患者的运动学和临床研究。

Adjacent segment motion following multi-level ACDF: a kinematic and clinical study in patients with zero-profile anchored spacer or plate.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, China.

Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Shunyi Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2019 Oct;28(10):2408-2416. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06109-8. Epub 2019 Aug 19.


DOI:10.1007/s00586-019-06109-8
PMID:31428860
Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the adjacent segment kinematics, including the instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR) and range of motion (ROM), after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and to compare between ACDF with zero-profile anchored spacer (ACDF-Z) and ACDF with plate (ACDF-P). METHODS: Eighty-seven patients (ACDF-Z = 63; ACDF-P = 24) were included. Flexion, extension and neutral cervical radiographs were obtained before operation and at 1-year follow-up. C2-C7 ROM, adjacent segment ROMs, and IARs were measured. Clinical evaluation was based on the Visual Analogue Scale, Neck Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. RESULTS: After ACDF-Z, location of the superior IAR-AP reduced 1.60 mm, which represents 8% of the vertebral body (P < 0.001), and location of the inferior IAR-SI reduced 2.19 mm, 17% of the vertebral body (P = 0.02). After ACDF-P, location of the superior IAR-AP increased 0.8 mm, which means 6% of the vertebral body (P = 0.008), location of the inferior IAR-AP increased 3.34 mm, 22% of the vertebral body (P = 0.03), and location of the inferior IAR-SI reduced 3.14 mm, 25% of the vertebral body (P = 0.002). C2-C7 ROM significantly decreased after both ACDF-Z and ACDF-P (P < 0.001). Neither ACDF-Z nor ACDF-P significantly affected the adjacent segment ROMs (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both ACDF-Z and ACDF-P significantly impacted cervical kinematics, although both procedures obtained satisfactory clinical results in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. After both ACDF-Z and ACDF-P, C2-C7 ROM decreased significantly, while adjacent segment ROMs were preserved. ACDF-Z and ACDF-P impact the location of adjacent segment IAR-SI in similar way, while impact the location of adjacent segment IAR-AP in diverse ways. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

摘要

目的:研究颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后(ACDF)邻近节段的运动学,包括瞬时旋转轴(IAR)和活动范围(ROM),并比较零切迹锚定椎间 spacer(ACDF-Z)与钢板(ACDF-P)的差异。 方法:共纳入 87 例患者(ACDF-Z 组 63 例,ACDF-P 组 24 例)。术前及术后 1 年分别拍摄颈椎屈伸中立位位片,测量 C2-C7 活动度、邻近节段活动度及 IAR。临床评估采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、颈残障指数(NDI)和日本矫形协会(JOA)评分。 结果:ACDF-Z 后,上 IAR-AP 位置减少 1.60mm,占椎体的 8%(P<0.001),下 IAR-SI 位置减少 2.19mm,占椎体的 17%(P=0.02)。ACDF-P 后,上 IAR-AP 位置增加 0.8mm,占椎体的 6%(P=0.008),下 IAR-AP 位置增加 3.34mm,占椎体的 22%(P=0.03),下 IAR-SI 位置减少 3.14mm,占椎体的 25%(P=0.002)。两种术式术后 C2-C7 活动度均显著降低(P<0.001)。两种术式对邻近节段活动度均无显著影响(P>0.05)。 结论:ACDF-Z 和 ACDF-P 均显著影响颈椎运动学,尽管两种术式在颈椎病的治疗中均取得了满意的临床效果。两种术式术后 C2-C7 活动度均显著降低,而邻近节段活动度保持不变。ACDF-Z 和 ACDF-P 对邻近节段 IAR-SI 的影响方式相似,对邻近节段 IAR-AP 的影响方式不同。这些幻灯片可以在电子补充材料中检索到。

相似文献

[1]
Adjacent segment motion following multi-level ACDF: a kinematic and clinical study in patients with zero-profile anchored spacer or plate.

Eur Spine J. 2019-8-19

[2]
Adjacent-level biomechanics after single-level anterior cervical interbody fusion with anchored zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate construct: a finite element study.

BMC Surg. 2020-4-6

[3]
Motion analysis of dynamic cervical implant stabilization versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a retrospective analysis of 70 cases.

Eur Spine J. 2018-9-7

[4]
Kinematics of the cervical adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012-10-15

[5]
Biomechanical evaluation of a low-profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device at the index level or adjacent to plated fusion.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014-6-1

[6]
A comparison study between hybrid surgery and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylosis.

Bone Joint J. 2020-8

[7]
Artificial disc replacement combined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level disc disease.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009-5-15

[8]
Comparison of Cervical Kinematics, Pain, and Functional Disability Between Single- and Two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016-8-1

[9]
Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.

Spine J. 2014-6-1

[10]
Adjacent segment biomechanical changes after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using either a zero-profile device or cage plus plate: A finite element analysis.

Comput Biol Med. 2020-5

引用本文的文献

[1]
Mapping the Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research Landscape: Topic Modeling of the Literature.

Global Spine J. 2025-4

[2]
A Comparison of Corpectomy ACDF Hybrid Procedures with Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide 66 Cage and Titanium Mesh Cage for Multi-level Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Stepwise Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Orthop Surg. 2023-11

[3]
Changes in cervical alignment of Zero-profile device versus conventional cage-plate construct after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2022-11-24

[4]
A Systematic Review on Neurological Outcomes for Cervical Degenerative Myelopathy After Anterior Decompression Surgery: Motion Preservation vs Fusion.

Int J Spine Surg. 2022-12

[5]
Clinical Efficacy of Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Decompression for Symptomatic Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Orthop Surg. 2022-5

[6]
Clinical impact of 3-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex: a retrospective study of patients who received a zero-profile anchored spacer versus cage-plate construct.

Eur Spine J. 2021-12

本文引用的文献

[1]
Motion analysis of dynamic cervical implant stabilization versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a retrospective analysis of 70 cases.

Eur Spine J. 2018-9-7

[2]
Comparison of Multilevel Cervical Disc Replacement and Multilevel Anterior Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review of Biomechanical and Clinical Evidence.

World Neurosurg. 2018-8

[3]
Comparison among perfect-C®, zero-P®, and plates with a cage in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018-1-25

[4]
Reduced instantaneous center of rotation movement in patients with low back pain.

Eur Spine J. 2018-1

[5]
Comparison of 2 Zero-Profile Implants in the Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Preliminary Clinical Study of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty versus Fusion.

PLoS One. 2016-7-21

[6]
Comparison of Cervical Kinematics, Pain, and Functional Disability Between Single- and Two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016-8-1

[7]
Are the standard parameters of cervical spine alignment and range of motion related to age, sex, and cervical disc degeneration?

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015-9

[8]
Does a zero-profile anchored cage offer additional stabilization as anterior cervical plate?

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015-5-15

[9]
Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Pain. 2014-12

[10]
Kinematic study of the relation between the instantaneous center of rotation and degenerative changes in the cervical intervertebral disc.

Eur Spine J. 2014-11

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索