Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 Jul;49(4):3. doi: 10.1002/hast.1026.
Biomedical science is usually framed for the public in terms of its "promise." When a breakthrough results from scientific inquiry, that promise is translated into a hope for a cure. The "promise" of such advances in biomedical research can have a paradoxical effect. In the case of pediatric neuromuscular disease, rather than reducing suffering, the expectation of cure can be a burden-both physically and emotionally-for affected children and their families. If a family expects a cure, it is likely to do everything possible to help the child live as long as possible, in the hope that the child will eventually receive it. I am not arguing that the appropriate response to the paradox of promise is to impede scientific progress. What is needed, however, is a broader conception of hope-one that values hope for a good day, a good quality of life, good relationships, or even a good death-alongside the hope for a cure.
生物医学科学通常以其“承诺”向公众阐述。当科学研究取得突破时,这种承诺就会转化为对治愈的希望。生物医学研究的这种进步的“承诺”可能会产生一种矛盾的效果。在儿科神经肌肉疾病的情况下,治愈的期望不仅没有减轻痛苦,反而会给患病儿童及其家庭带来身体和情感上的双重负担。如果一个家庭期待治愈,那么它很可能会尽一切可能帮助孩子尽可能长时间地活着,希望孩子最终能够得到治愈。我并不是说,解决承诺悖论的恰当方法是阻碍科学进步。然而,我们需要的是对希望有一个更广泛的理解——一种不仅将希望寄托在治愈上,还将希望寄托在美好的一天、高质量的生活、良好的人际关系,甚至美好的死亡上。