• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用不同冲洗方法去除根管内玷污层的评估

Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Using Different Irrigation Methods In Root Canals.

作者信息

Ballal V, Rao S, Al-Haj Husain N, Özcan M

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2019 Aug 29;27(3):97-102. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_01817Husain06.

DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_01817Husain06
PMID:31433134
Abstract

This study evaluated different irrigation methods in smear layer removal from the root canal walls using maleic acid (MA). Maxillary anterior teeth (N=30, n=10 per group) were decoronated, canals were enlarged with Protaper (size F4) and allocated to three groups: EndoUltra: 2.5 ml of 7% MA was irrigated for 30 s, followed by EndoUltra activation for 30 s; EndoSafe: EndoSafe irrigation system was used for 1 minute using 5 ml of 7% MA; Side-vented needle: 30 gauge needle irrigation was performed for 1 min using 5 ml of 7% MA. After SEM analysis, the inter-examiner reliability was verified using Kendall's Co-efficient and data were analyzed using Pearson Chi-Square test. No statistical significant differences were found between the two examiners (p⟩0.05). In intra-group comparison, needle and EndoSafe irrigation demonstrated significantly better smear layer removal at middle third of the root canal system (p⟨0.05) when compared to apical third. In inter-group comparison, smear layer was minimally removed with needle irrigation. In the apical third, EndoUltra group removed smear layer more effectively. Endosafe needle irrigation in combination with 7% MA removed the smear layer in the root canal at best, while the EndoUltra performed the best at the apical third of the root.

摘要

本研究评估了使用马来酸(MA)从根管壁去除玷污层的不同冲洗方法。选取上颌前牙(N = 30,每组n = 10),截冠后,用Protaper(F4号)扩大根管,并分为三组:EndoUltra组:用2.5 ml 7%的MA冲洗30秒,随后进行EndoUltra激活30秒;EndoSafe组:使用EndoSafe冲洗系统,用5 ml 7%的MA冲洗1分钟;侧孔针组:用30号针,用5 ml 7%的MA冲洗1分钟。经过扫描电子显微镜分析后,使用肯德尔系数验证检查者间的可靠性,并使用Pearson卡方检验分析数据。两位检查者之间未发现统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。在组内比较中,与根尖三分之一相比,针管冲洗和EndoSafe冲洗在根管系统中三分之一处的玷污层去除效果明显更好(p<0.05)。在组间比较中,针管冲洗去除的玷污层最少。在根尖三分之一处,EndoUltra组去除玷污层的效果更有效。Endosafe针管冲洗联合7%的MA在根管中去除玷污层的效果最佳,而EndoUltra在根尖三分之一处表现最佳。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Using Different Irrigation Methods In Root Canals.使用不同冲洗方法去除根管内玷污层的评估
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2019 Aug 29;27(3):97-102. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_01817Husain06.
2
[In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher file on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation].[XP-endo Finisher锉在根管预备后对玷污层去除效果的体外评价]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 1;37(1):48-52. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2019.01.009.
3
Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.不同终末冲洗液激活方案对弯曲根管内玷污层去除效果的影响。
J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 13.
4
A Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal by Using Four Different Irrigation Solutions like Root Canal Irrigants: An SEM Study.四种根管冲洗液去除玷污层效果的比较评价:扫描电镜研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 May 1;22(5):527-531.
5
Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.使用自调式锉时乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和MTAD去除碎屑及玷污层的效果
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):803-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.038. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
6
Analysis of the smear layer generated by different activation systems: an in vitro study.不同激活系统产生的玷污层分析:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jan;25(1):211-218. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03355-9. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
7
Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.使用不同冲洗系统(EndoActivator、EndoVac和被动超声冲洗)去除玷污层和清洁根管:一项体外研究的场发射扫描电子显微镜评估
J Endod. 2013 Nov;39(11):1456-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.028. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
8
Evaluation of SmearOFF, maleic acid and two EDTA preparations in smear layer removal from root canal dentin.评价 SmearOFF、马来酸和两种 EDTA 制剂在去除根管牙本质玷污层中的作用。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Jan;77(1):28-32. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1495842. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
9
Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.不同冲洗激活系统对根管清洁效果的 SEM 评估
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Dec;21(9):2681-2687. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2070-x. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
10
Root canal debris removal using different irrigating needles: an SEM study.使用不同冲洗针进行根管清创的扫描电镜研究
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Sep-Oct;22(5):659-63. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.93452.

引用本文的文献

1
Histological Investigation of the Cleaning Effectiveness of Different Biomechanic Processes of Isthmus in Lower Molars.下颌磨牙峡部不同生物力学过程清洁效果的组织学研究
Eur J Dent. 2023 May;17(2):517-523. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1753455. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
2
SEM Evaluation of Tooth Surface after a Composite Filling Removal Using Er:YAG Laser, Drills with and without Curettes, and Optional EDTA or NaOCl Conditioning.使用铒钇铝石榴石激光、有无刮匙的牙钻以及可选的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)或次氯酸钠(NaOCl)预处理去除复合树脂充填物后牙齿表面的扫描电子显微镜评估
Materials (Basel). 2021 Aug 10;14(16):4469. doi: 10.3390/ma14164469.
3
Smear layer removal by passive ultrasonic irrigation and 2 new mechanical methods for activation of the chelating solution.
通过被动超声冲洗去除玷污层以及两种用于激活螯合溶液的新机械方法。
Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Jan 26;46(1):e11. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e11. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
Analysis of the smear layer generated by different activation systems: an in vitro study.不同激活系统产生的玷污层分析:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jan;25(1):211-218. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03355-9. Epub 2020 Jun 9.