Suppr超能文献

针对多发性骨髓瘤治疗的靶向 BCMA 的 CD3 双特异性和 ADC 模式的临床前疗效和安全性比较。

Preclinical Efficacy and Safety Comparison of CD3 Bispecific and ADC Modalities Targeting BCMA for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.

机构信息

Allogene Therapeutics, Research, South San Francisco, California.

ALX Oncology, Biology, South San Francisco, California.

出版信息

Mol Cancer Ther. 2019 Nov;18(11):2008-2020. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0007. Epub 2019 Aug 21.

Abstract

The restricted expression pattern of B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) makes it an ideal tumor-associated antigen (TAA) for the treatment of myeloma. BCMA has been targeted by both CD3 bispecific antibody and antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) modalities, but a true comparison of modalities has yet to be performed. Here we utilized a single BCMA antibody to develop and characterize both a CD3 bispecific and 2 ADC formats (cleavable and noncleavable) and compared activity both and with the aim of generating an optimal therapeutic. Antibody affinity, but not epitope was influential in drug activity and hence a high-affinity BCMA antibody was selected. Both the bispecific and ADCs were potent and , causing dose-dependent cell killing of myeloma cell lines and tumor regression in orthotopic myeloma xenograft models. Primary patient cells were effectively lysed by both CD3 bispecific and ADCs, with the bispecific demonstrating improved potency, maximal cell killing, and consistency across patients. Safety was evaluated in cynomolgus monkey toxicity studies and both modalities were active based on on-target elimination of B lineage cells. Distinct nonclinical toxicity profiles were seen for the bispecific and ADC modalities. When taken together, results from this comparison of BCMA CD3 bispecific and ADC modalities suggest better efficacy and an improved toxicity profile might be achieved with the bispecific modality. This led to the advancement of a bispecific candidate into phase I clinical trials.

摘要

B 细胞成熟抗原 (BCMA) 的限制表达模式使其成为治疗多发性骨髓瘤的理想肿瘤相关抗原 (TAA)。BCMA 已成为 CD3 双特异性抗体和抗体药物偶联物 (ADC) 两种治疗方式的靶点,但尚未对这两种治疗方式进行真正的比较。在这里,我们利用一种单一的 BCMA 抗体来开发和表征 CD3 双特异性抗体和 2 种 ADC 形式(可裂解和不可裂解),并比较它们的活性,旨在生成一种最佳的治疗方法。抗体亲和力,但不是表位,对药物活性有影响,因此选择了高亲和力的 BCMA 抗体。双特异性抗体和 ADC 都能有效 , ,导致骨髓瘤细胞系的剂量依赖性细胞杀伤和原位骨髓瘤异种移植模型中的肿瘤消退。两种 CD3 双特异性抗体和 ADC 都能有效裂解原代患者细胞,双特异性抗体显示出更好的效力、最大的细胞杀伤作用和在患者中的一致性。在食蟹猴毒性研究中评估了安全性,两种治疗方式都能基于对 B 细胞谱系细胞的靶向消除而发挥作用。双特异性抗体和 ADC 两种治疗方式的非临床毒性特征明显不同。综合来看,这项 BCMA CD3 双特异性抗体和 ADC 治疗方式比较的结果表明,双特异性抗体治疗方式可能具有更好的疗效和改善的毒性特征。这导致了一种双特异性候选药物进入 I 期临床试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验