Faculty of Physics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
N.M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Photosynth Res. 2019 Dec;142(3):265-282. doi: 10.1007/s11120-019-00663-4. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
Tradescantia is a good model for assaying induction events in higher plant leaves. Chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence serves as a sensitive reporter of the functional state of photosynthetic apparatus in chloroplasts. The fluorescence time-course depends on the leaf growth conditions and actinic light quality. In this work, we investigated slow induction of Chl a fluorescence (SIF) excited by blue light (BL, λ = 455 nm) or red light (RL, λ = 630 nm) in dark-adapted leaves of Tradescantia fluminensis acclimated to high light (~ 1000 µmol photons m s; HL) or low light (~ 100 µmol photons m s; LL). Our special interest was focused on the contribution of the avoidance response to SIF kinetics. Bearing in mind that BL and RL have different impacts on photoreceptors that initiate chloroplast movements within the cell (accumulation/avoidance responses), we have compared the SIF patterns during the action of BL and RL. The time-courses of SIF and kinetics of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of Chl a fluorescence revealed a certain difference when leaves were illuminated by BL or RL. In both cases, the yield of fluorescence rose to the maximal level P and then, after the lag-phase P-S-M, the fluorescence level decreased toward the steady state T (via the intermediate phases M-M and M-T). In LL-acclimated leaves, the duration of the P-S-M phase was almost two times longer that in HL-grown plants. In the case of BL, the fluorescence decay included the transient phase M-M. This phase was obscure during the RL illumination. Non-photochemical quenching of Chl a fluorescence has been quantified as [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] stand for the fluorescence response to saturating pulses of light applied to dark-adapted and illuminated samples, respectively. The time-courses of such a formally determined NPQ value were markedly different during the action of RL and BL. In LL-grown leaves, BL induced higher NPQ as compared to the action of RL. In HL-grown plants, the difference between the NPQ responses to BL and RL illumination was insignificant. Comparing the peculiarities of Chl a fluorescence induced by BL and RL, we conclude that the avoidance response can provide a marked contribution to SIF and NPQ generation. The dependence of NPQ on the quality of actinic light suggests that chloroplast movements within the cell have a noticeable impact on the formally determined NPQ value. Analyzing kinetics of post-illumination decay of NPQ in the context of solar stress resistance, we have found that LL-acclimated Tradescantia leaves are more vulnerable to strong light than the HL-grown leaves.
紫露草是检测高等植物叶片诱导事件的良好模型。叶绿素(Chl)荧光可以作为叶绿体光合作用装置功能状态的敏感报告器。荧光时程取决于叶片生长条件和光质。在这项工作中,我们研究了在高光 (1000 μmol 光子 m−2 s−1;HL)或低光 (100 μmol 光子 m−2 s−1;LL)下适应的紫露草叶片中蓝光 (BL,λ=455 nm)或红光 (RL,λ=630 nm) 激发的 Chl a 荧光的缓慢诱导 (SIF)。我们特别关注回避反应对 SIF 动力学的贡献。考虑到 BL 和 RL 对引发细胞内叶绿体运动的光受体有不同的影响(积累/回避反应),我们比较了 BL 和 RL 作用时的 SIF 模式。SIF 的时间过程和 Chl a 荧光的非光化学猝灭(NPQ)动力学揭示了叶片被 BL 或 RL 照射时存在一定差异。在这两种情况下,荧光产量均升高至最大水平 P,然后在滞后相 P-S-M 之后,荧光水平通过中间相 M-M 和 M-T 下降至稳态 T。在 LL 适应的叶片中,P-S-M 相的持续时间几乎是 HL 生长植株的两倍长。在 BL 的情况下,荧光衰减包括瞬态相 M-M。在 RL 照射时,这个相不明显。Chl a 荧光的非光化学猝灭已被量化为 [Formula: see text],其中 [Formula: see text] 和 [Formula: see text] 分别代表暗适应和光照样品对饱和光脉冲的荧光响应。在 RL 和 BL 作用期间,这种正式确定的 NPQ 值的时间过程明显不同。在 LL 生长的叶片中,BL 诱导的 NPQ 高于 RL 的作用。在 HL 生长的植物中,BL 和 RL 光照对 NPQ 的响应差异不显著。比较 BL 和 RL 诱导的 Chl a 荧光的特点,我们得出结论,回避反应可以为 SIF 和 NPQ 的产生提供显著贡献。NPQ 对光质的依赖性表明,细胞内的叶绿体运动对正式确定的 NPQ 值有显著影响。在分析抗太阳胁迫的光照后 NPQ 衰减动力学时,我们发现,与 HL 生长的叶片相比,LL 适应的紫露草叶片对强光更敏感。