Kohls Niko, Esch Tobias, Gerber Lea, Adrian Lucas, Wittmann Marc
Division of Integrative Health Promotion, Department of Social Work and Health, University of Applied Sciences Coburg, D-96450 Coburg, Germany.
School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, D-58448 Witten, Germany.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2019 Aug 15;9(8):87. doi: 10.3390/bs9080087.
(1) Background: Mind-body interventions (MBI), such as meditation or other relaxation techniques, have become the focus of attention in the clinical and health sciences. Differences in the effects of induction techniques are being increasingly investigated. (2) Methods: Here, we compared changes in the individual experience of time, space, and self in 44 students in an integrative health-promotion program. They participated in a study employing mindfulness meditation and a relaxation intervention with one week between sessions, thus employing a within-subjects design. (3) Results: No significant differences were detected when subjective reports were compared directly after each intervention. However, we found significant sequence effects between t1 and t2, independent of the meditation type. The sense of self diminished, the present orientation increased, and the past and future orientations decreased in both interventions. (4) Conclusions: We propose using scales to assess subjective time, self, and space as basic constituents of experience to measure the specificity of intervention methods, as well as longitudinal changes.
(1)背景:身心干预(MBI),如冥想或其他放松技巧,已成为临床和健康科学领域的关注焦点。诱导技术效果的差异正受到越来越多的研究。(2)方法:在此,我们比较了44名参加综合健康促进项目的学生在时间、空间和自我个体体验方面的变化。他们参与了一项采用正念冥想和放松干预的研究,各疗程之间间隔一周,因此采用了被试内设计。(3)结果:每次干预后直接比较主观报告时,未发现显著差异。然而,我们发现t1和t2之间存在显著的序列效应,与冥想类型无关。在两种干预中,自我意识减弱,当下取向增加,过去和未来取向减少。(4)结论:我们建议使用量表来评估主观时间、自我和空间,作为体验的基本组成部分,以衡量干预方法的特异性以及纵向变化。