Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia.
Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Oct 16;85(21). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01368-19. Print 2019 Nov 1.
Culture-based molecular identification methods have revolutionized detection of pathogens, yet these methods are slow and may yield inconclusive results from environmental materials. The second-generation sequencing tools have much-improved precision and sensitivity of detection, but these analyses are costly and may take several days to months. Of the third-generation sequencing techniques, the portable MinION device (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) has received much attention because of its small size and possibility of rapid analysis at reasonable cost. Here, we compare the relative performances of two third-generation sequencing instruments, MinION and Sequel (Pacific Biosciences), in identification and diagnostics of fungal and oomycete pathogens from conifer (Pinaceae) needles and potato () leaves and tubers. We demonstrate that the Sequel instrument is efficient for metabarcoding of complex samples, whereas MinION is not suited for this purpose due to a high error rate and multiple biases. However, we find that MinION can be utilized for rapid and accurate identification of dominant pathogenic organisms and other associated organisms from plant tissues following both amplicon-based and PCR-free metagenomics approaches. Using the metagenomics approach with shortened DNA extraction and incubation times, we performed the entire MinION workflow, from sample preparation through DNA extraction, sequencing, bioinformatics, and interpretation, in 2.5 h. We advocate the use of MinION for rapid diagnostics of pathogens and potentially other organisms, but care needs to be taken to control or account for multiple potential technical biases. Microbial pathogens cause enormous losses to agriculture and forestry, but current combined culturing- and molecular identification-based detection methods are too slow for rapid identification and application of countermeasures. Here, we develop new and rapid protocols for Oxford Nanopore MinION-based third-generation diagnostics of plant pathogens that greatly improve the speed of diagnostics. However, due to high error rate and technical biases in MinION, the Pacific BioSciences Sequel platform is more useful for in-depth amplicon-based biodiversity monitoring (metabarcoding) from complex environmental samples.
基于培养的分子鉴定方法彻底改变了病原体的检测方式,但这些方法耗时且可能无法从环境样本中得出明确的结果。第二代测序工具极大地提高了检测的精度和灵敏度,但这些分析成本高昂,可能需要数天到数月的时间。在第三代测序技术中,便携式 MinION 设备(Oxford Nanopore Technologies)因其体积小且有可能以合理的成本进行快速分析而备受关注。在这里,我们比较了两种第三代测序仪器,MinION 和 Sequel(Pacific Biosciences),在鉴定和诊断来自针叶树(松科)针和土豆()叶片和块茎的真菌和卵菌病原体方面的相对性能。我们证明,Sequel 仪器非常适合对复杂样本进行代谢组学分析,而 MinION 由于错误率高和多种偏差,不适合用于此目的。然而,我们发现 MinION 可用于通过基于扩增子和无 PCR 的宏基因组学方法,从植物组织中快速准确地鉴定优势致病生物和其他相关生物。使用缩短 DNA 提取和孵育时间的宏基因组学方法,我们在 2.5 小时内完成了整个 MinION 工作流程,从样品制备到 DNA 提取、测序、生物信息学和解释。我们提倡使用 MinION 进行病原体的快速诊断,并且可能还有其他生物,但需要注意控制或考虑多种潜在的技术偏差。微生物病原体对农业和林业造成了巨大损失,但当前基于培养和分子鉴定的联合检测方法对于快速鉴定和应用对策来说太慢了。在这里,我们开发了基于 Oxford Nanopore MinION 的植物病原体第三代诊断的新的快速协议,极大地提高了诊断速度。然而,由于 MinION 的高错误率和技术偏差,Pacific BioSciences Sequel 平台更适合从复杂环境样本中进行深入的基于扩增子的生物多样性监测(代谢组学)。