Kagiyama Nobuyuki, Shrestha Sirish
West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2020 Jan;47(1):59-70. doi: 10.1007/s10396-019-00971-1. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is one of the most frequent indications for valve surgery in developed countries, and echocardiographic assessment is an essential tool to evaluate its etiologies, severity, and therapeutic indications. The mitral valve apparatus is a complex structure composed of several parts: apart from the mitral valve leaflets and annulus, it also includes the chordae tendineae, papillary muscles, and left ventricular (LV) wall. MR can be caused not only by organic changes of the mitral valve leaflets or chordae (primary MR) but also by extreme mitral annular enlargement or mitral leaflet tethering due to displacement and malfunction of papillary muscles and LV wall (secondary MR). In secondary MR with LV dysfunction, a milder degree of MR can be associated with adverse outcomes compared with primary MR. Grading the severity is the first step in evaluation of indication for surgical/transcatheter interventions. As such, there are several techniques to assess the severity of MR using echocardiography. However, none of the techniques is reliable enough by itself, and it is always recommended to integrate multiple methods. In cases where echocardiographic assessment of MR severity is inconclusive, magnetic resonance may be helpful. In addition to the severity, anatomical information, such as localization in primary MR due to mitral valve prolapse and LV size in secondary MR due to LV dilatation/dysfunction, is an important concern in presurgical echocardiography. Transesophageal echocardiography and three-dimensional echocardiography are key techniques for anatomical evaluation including mitral valve and LV volumes. In transcatheter intervention for MR, echocardiography plays a pivotal role as a guide for procedures and endpoints. In this review article, the authors provide a comprehensive summary of current standards of echocardiographic assessment of MR.
二尖瓣反流(MR)是发达国家瓣膜手术最常见的适应证之一,超声心动图评估是评估其病因、严重程度及治疗适应证的重要工具。二尖瓣装置是一个由多个部分组成的复杂结构:除二尖瓣叶和瓣环外,还包括腱索、乳头肌和左心室壁。MR不仅可由二尖瓣叶或腱索的器质性改变(原发性MR)引起,还可由乳头肌和左心室壁移位及功能障碍导致的二尖瓣环极度扩大或二尖瓣叶受限(继发性MR)引起。在伴有左心室功能障碍的继发性MR中,与原发性MR相比,程度较轻的MR也可能与不良预后相关。评估严重程度是评估手术/经导管介入治疗适应证的第一步。因此,有几种使用超声心动图评估MR严重程度的技术。然而,这些技术本身都不够可靠,始终建议综合多种方法。在MR严重程度的超声心动图评估结果不明确的情况下,磁共振成像可能会有所帮助。除严重程度外,解剖学信息,如二尖瓣脱垂导致的原发性MR的定位以及左心室扩张/功能障碍导致的继发性MR中的左心室大小,也是术前超声心动图检查的重要关注点。经食管超声心动图和三维超声心动图是包括二尖瓣和左心室容积在内的解剖学评估的关键技术。在MR的经导管介入治疗中,超声心动图作为操作和终点的指导发挥着关键作用。在这篇综述文章中,作者对目前MR超声心动图评估的标准进行了全面总结。