• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How Engaged Are Family Physicians in Addressing the Social Determinants of Health? A Survey Supporting the American Academy of Family Physician's Health Equity Environmental Scan.家庭医生在解决健康的社会决定因素方面参与度如何?一项支持美国家庭医生学会健康公平环境扫描的调查。
Health Equity. 2019 Aug 23;3(1):449-457. doi: 10.1089/heq.2019.0022. eCollection 2019.
2
Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Family Medicine Practices.家庭医疗实践中的健康社会决定因素应对。
Popul Health Manag. 2024 Feb;27(1):26-33. doi: 10.1089/pop.2023.0014. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
3
Integrating the Social Determinants of Health into Nursing Practice: Nurses' Perspectives.将健康的社会决定因素融入护理实践:护士的观点。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020 Sep;52(5):497-505. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12584. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
4
Informing the American Academy of family Physician's Health Equity strategy - an environmental scan using the Delphi technique.为美国家庭医师学会的健康公平战略提供信息——运用德尔菲技术进行环境扫描。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 21;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1007-1.
5
Clinical problem solving and social determinants of health: a descriptive study using unannounced standardized patients to directly observe how resident physicians respond to social determinants of health.临床问题解决与健康的社会决定因素:一项描述性研究,使用未事先通知的标准化患者直接观察住院医师如何应对健康的社会决定因素。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 Aug 27;7(3):313-324. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0002.
6
Impact of social determinants of health on cancer care: a survey of community oncologists.社会健康决定因素对癌症护理的影响:对社区肿瘤学家的调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 6;11(10):e049259. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049259.
7
Raising patient voices in medical education: an assessment of patient perceived effect of social determinants of health conversations and the patient-physician relationship on quality of obstetric care, to inform the development of patient driven medical education curricula.在医学教育中提升患者声音:评估患者对健康社会决定因素对话以及医患关系对产科护理质量的感知影响,以为患者驱动的医学教育课程开发提供参考。
Front Reprod Health. 2024 Feb 15;6:1283390. doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1283390. eCollection 2024.
8
Framework for building primary care capacity to address the social determinants of health.建立基层医疗能力的框架,以解决健康的社会决定因素。
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Nov;63(11):e476-e482.
9
A feasibility and acceptability study of screening the parents/guardians of pediatric dental patients for the social determinants of health.一项针对儿科牙科患者的父母/监护人进行健康社会决定因素筛查的可行性和可接受性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Mar 9;9(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01269-3.
10
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating an Emergency Department Discharge Center: A Learning Organization Approach for Efficiency and Future Directions.评估急诊科出院中心:一种提高效率及未来发展方向的学习型组织方法
Cureus. 2024 Nov 11;16(11):e73470. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73470. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Potential benefits of incorporating social determinants of health screening on comprehensive medication management effectiveness.将健康社会决定因素筛查纳入综合药物管理有效性的潜在益处。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Nov;30(11):1217-1224. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.11.1217.
3
Becoming Self Employed: Israeli Family Physicians' Push and Pull Factors.自主创业:以色列家庭医生的推动因素与拉动因素
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 2;12(17):1749. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171749.
4
Impact of COVID-19 on Referral Patterns and Service Delivery for an Integrated Behavioral Health Program.2019年冠状病毒病对综合行为健康项目的转诊模式和服务提供的影响
Fam Soc. 2023 Jun;104(2):142-153. doi: 10.1177/10443894221133500. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
5
Assessing Factors Influencing Commitment to a Disparities Reduction Intervention: Social Justice Attitudes and Organizational Mission.评估影响减少差异干预承诺的因素:社会公正态度和组织使命。
J Healthc Qual. 2023;45(4):209-219. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000385.
6
Delivering Food Resources and Kitchen Skills (FoRKS) to Adults with Food Insecurity and Hypertension: A Pilot Study.为食物不安全和高血压成年人提供食物资源和烹饪技能(FoRKS):一项试点研究。
Nutrients. 2023 Mar 17;15(6):1452. doi: 10.3390/nu15061452.
7
Implementing social interventions in primary care in Canada: A qualitative exploration of lessons learned from leaders in the field.在加拿大的初级保健中实施社会干预措施:对该领域的领导者的经验教训进行的定性探索。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 16;18(2):e0281112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281112. eCollection 2023.
8
Primary care physicians' perceptions of social determinants of health recommendations: a qualitative study.初级保健医生对健康建议的社会决定因素的看法:一项定性研究。
BJGP Open. 2023 Mar 21;7(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0129. Print 2023 Mar.
9
The Structural Analysis: Incorporating Structurally Competent Clinical Reasoning into Case-Based Presentations.结构分析:将具有结构能力的临床推理纳入基于案例的呈现中。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Oct;37(13):3465-3470. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07751-7. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
10
The pharmacist as a public health resource: Expanding telepharmacy services to address social determinants of health during the COVID-19 pandemic.药剂师作为一种公共卫生资源:在新冠疫情期间扩大远程药学服务以应对健康的社会决定因素。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2021 Jun 5;2:100032. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100032. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Informing the American Academy of family Physician's Health Equity strategy - an environmental scan using the Delphi technique.为美国家庭医师学会的健康公平战略提供信息——运用德尔菲技术进行环境扫描。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 21;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1007-1.
2
Economics of Community Health Workers for Chronic Disease: Findings From Community Guide Systematic Reviews.社区卫生工作者在慢性病方面的经济学研究:社区指南系统评价的结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Mar;56(3):e95-e106. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.10.009.
3
Family Medicine's Task in Population Health: Defining It and Owning It.家庭医学在人群健康中的任务:明确并承担该任务。
Fam Med. 2018 Oct;50(9):659-661. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.868771.
4
Screening for social determinants of health in clinical care: moving from the margins to the mainstream.在临床护理中筛查健康的社会决定因素:从边缘走向主流。
Public Health Rev. 2018 Jun 22;39:19. doi: 10.1186/s40985-018-0094-7. eCollection 2018.
5
Effects of Social Needs Screening and In-Person Service Navigation on Child Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社会需求筛查和现场服务导航对儿童健康的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Nov 7;170(11):e162521. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2521.
6
Community Vital Signs: Taking the Pulse of the Community While Caring for Patients.社区生命体征:在照顾患者的同时把握社区的脉搏。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 May-Jun;29(3):419-22. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.03.150172.
7
Eliminating Health Disparities through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: A Systematic Review of Home Visiting in the United States, 2005-2015.通过对健康的社会决定因素采取行动消除健康差距:对2005 - 2015年美国家访的系统评价
Public Health Nurs. 2017 Jan;34(1):2-30. doi: 10.1111/phn.12268. Epub 2016 May 5.
8
Perspectives in Primary Care: A Conceptual Framework and Path for Integrating Social Determinants of Health Into Primary Care Practice.初级保健视角:将健康的社会决定因素纳入初级保健实践的概念框架与路径
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Mar;14(2):104-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1903.
9
"Community vital signs": incorporating geocoded social determinants into electronic records to promote patient and population health.“社区生命体征”:将地理编码的社会决定因素纳入电子记录以促进患者和人群健康。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):407-12. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv088. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
10
A randomized trial on screening for social determinants of health: the iScreen study.一项关于健康社会决定因素筛查的随机试验:iScreen研究。
Pediatrics. 2014 Dec;134(6):e1611-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1439. Epub 2014 Nov 3.

家庭医生在解决健康的社会决定因素方面参与度如何?一项支持美国家庭医生学会健康公平环境扫描的调查。

How Engaged Are Family Physicians in Addressing the Social Determinants of Health? A Survey Supporting the American Academy of Family Physician's Health Equity Environmental Scan.

作者信息

Kovach Kevin A, Reid Kathy, Grandmont Jené, Jones Danielle, Wood Julie, Schoof Bellinda

机构信息

American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, Kansas.

HealthLandscape, American Academy of Family Physicians, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

Health Equity. 2019 Aug 23;3(1):449-457. doi: 10.1089/heq.2019.0022. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1089/heq.2019.0022
PMID:31448355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6707032/
Abstract

Public health leaders have advocated for clinical and population-based interventions to address the social determinants of health (SDoH). The American Academy of Family Physicians has worked to support family physicians with addressing the SDoH. However, the extent that family physicians are engaged and the factors that influence this are unknown. A survey was used to identify actions family physicians had taken to address the SDoH and perceived barriers. Physician and community characteristics were linked. Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with engagement in clinical and population-based actions, separately. There were 434 (8.7%) responses. Among respondents, 81.1% were engaged in at least one clinical action, and 43.3% were engaged in at least one population-based action. Time (80.0%) and staffing (64.5%) were the most common barriers. Physician experience was associated with higher levels of clinical engagement, lower median household income was associated with higher levels of population-based engagement, and working for a federally qualified health center (FQHC) was associated with both. The study provides preliminary information suggesting that family physicians are engaged in addressing the SDoH through clinical and population-based actions. Newer family physicians and those working in FQHCs may be good targets for piloting clinical actions to address SDoH and family physician advocates may be more likely to come from an FQHC or in a lower socioeconomic neighborhood. The study also raises questions about the value family physicians serving disadvantaged communities place on clinical interventions to address the SDoH.

摘要

公共卫生领导者倡导采取基于临床和人群的干预措施,以解决健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)。美国家庭医生学会一直致力于支持家庭医生应对SDoH。然而,家庭医生的参与程度以及影响这一程度的因素尚不清楚。一项调查被用于确定家庭医生为应对SDoH所采取的行动以及感知到的障碍。将医生和社区特征联系起来。分别使用有序逻辑回归来确定与参与基于临床和人群的行动相关的因素。共有434份(8.7%)回复。在受访者中,81.1%参与了至少一项临床行动,43.3%参与了至少一项基于人群基础的行动。时间(80.0%)和人员配备(64.5%)是最常见的障碍。医生经验与更高水平的临床参与相关,家庭收入中位数较低与更高水平的基于人群的参与相关,而在联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)工作与两者都相关。该研究提供了初步信息,表明家庭医生正通过基于临床和人群的行动来应对SDoH。新入职的家庭医生以及在FQHC工作的医生可能是试点应对SDoH临床行动的良好目标,而且家庭医生倡导者可能更有可能来自FQHC或社会经济地位较低的社区。该研究还提出了关于服务于弱势社区的家庭医生对解决SDoH的临床干预措施的重视程度的问题。