Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Eur J Neurol. 2020 Jan;27(1):18-26. doi: 10.1111/ene.14069. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
Stroke mimics form a significant proportion of cases in acute stroke services and some present with functional neurological disorder. Little is known about the prevalence or clinical characteristics of functional stroke mimics (FSMs). A systematic literature search and meta-analysis were carried out on published studies reporting suspected stroke and stroke mimic rates; 114 papers met the inclusion criteria of which 70 provided an FSM rate. Random-effects models estimated prevalence rates across settings and moderators of FSM rate. Pooled proportions indicated that 25% [95% confidence intervals (CI), 22-27%] of suspected stroke cases were stroke mimics. Within the 67 studies providing positive FSM rates, FSMs represented 15% (95% CI, 13-18%) of stroke mimics and 2% (95% CI, 2-3%) of suspected strokes. FSMs were younger and more likely to be female, and presented more with weakness/numbness but less with reduced consciousness or language problems. Stratified analyses suggested higher stroke mimic rates in primary care versus acute settings (38% vs. 12%) but higher FSM rates in stroke units compared with primary care (24% vs. 12%). Functional rates were higher in studies that were descriptive, retrospective and in patients receiving thrombolysis. Several studies reported the proportion of functional stroke patients presenting to stroke services. FSMs have discernible demographic and clinical characteristics, but there is a conspicuous lack of evidence on their presentation or guidance for treatment. The social and psychological mechanisms underlying FSM presentations need more accurate quantification to help inform stroke pathways and improve care for these patients.
中风模拟占急性中风服务中相当大的比例,其中一些表现为功能性神经障碍。对于功能性中风模拟(FSM)的患病率或临床特征知之甚少。对报告疑似中风和中风模拟率的已发表研究进行了系统的文献检索和荟萃分析;114 篇论文符合纳入标准,其中 70 篇提供了 FSM 率。随机效应模型估计了各设定下的流行率和 FSM 率的调节因素。汇总比例表明,25%(95%置信区间 [95%CI],22-27%)的疑似中风病例为中风模拟。在提供阳性 FSM 率的 67 项研究中,FSM 占中风模拟的 15%(95%CI,13-18%),占疑似中风的 2%(95%CI,2-3%)。FSM 患者年龄较小,更有可能为女性,表现为无力/麻木,但意识障碍或语言问题较少。分层分析表明,初级保健中风模拟率高于急性中风(38% vs. 12%),但中风单元中风模拟率高于初级保健(24% vs. 12%)。描述性、回顾性研究和接受溶栓治疗的患者中风模拟率较高。一些研究报告了功能性中风患者到中风服务就诊的比例。FSM 具有明显的人口统计学和临床特征,但缺乏关于其表现或治疗指导的明显证据。需要更准确地量化 FSM 表现背后的社会和心理机制,以帮助为这些患者提供中风途径并改善护理。