School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Burnley, Victoria, Australia.
School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 26;14(8):e0221403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221403. eCollection 2019.
Vegetation is a key determinant of wildfire behaviour at field scales as it functions as fuel. Past studies in the laboratory show that plant flammability, the ability of plants to ignite and maintain combustion, is a function of their traits. However, the way the traits of individual plants combine in a vegetation community to affect field flammability has received little attention. This study aims to bridge the gap between the laboratory and field by linking plant traits to metrics of field-scale flammability. Across three prescribed burns, in Eucalyptus-dominated damp and dry forest, we measured pre-burn plant species abundance and post-burn field flammability metrics (percentage area burnt, char and scorch height). For understory species with dominant cover-abundance, we measured nine traits that had been demonstrated to influence flammability in the laboratory. We used fourth-corner ordination to evaluate covariation between the plant traits, species abundance and flammability. We found that several traits covaried at the species level. In some instances, these traits (e.g. specific leaf area and bulk density) could have cumulative effects on the flammability of a species while in other instances (e.g. moisture and specific leaf area) they may have counteractive effects, assuming trait effects on flammability are akin to previous research. At field scales, species with similar traits tended to co-occur, suggesting that the effects of individual traits accumulate within a plant community. Fourth-corner analyses found the trait-field flammability relationship to be statistically significant. Traits significantly associated with increasing field flammability metrics were: bulk density (negatively associated) and hydrocarbon quantity, specific leaf area and surface area to volume ratio (all positively associated). Our study demonstrates that some traits known to influence flammability in the laboratory can be associated with field-scale flammability metrics. Further research is needed to isolate the contributions of individual traits to understand how species composition drives forest flammability.
植被是野外火灾行为的关键决定因素,因为它是燃料。过去在实验室进行的研究表明,植物的可燃性(植物点燃和维持燃烧的能力)是其特性的函数。然而,单个植物特性在植被群落中结合以影响野外可燃性的方式却很少受到关注。本研究旨在通过将植物特性与野外可燃性度量标准联系起来,在实验室和野外之间架起桥梁。在三次预定的燃烧中,在以桉树为主的潮湿和干燥森林中,我们测量了燃烧前植物物种的丰富度和燃烧后的野外可燃性度量标准(燃烧面积百分比、炭化和烧焦高度)。对于具有主导覆盖率的林下物种,我们测量了九个在实验室中被证明会影响可燃性的特性。我们使用四角分析来评估植物特性、物种丰富度和可燃性之间的共变关系。我们发现,一些特性在物种水平上存在共变。在某些情况下,这些特性(例如比叶面积和体积密度)可能对物种的可燃性产生累积效应,而在其他情况下(例如水分和比叶面积),它们可能会产生相反的效应,假设对可燃性的特性影响类似于以前的研究。在野外尺度上,具有相似特性的物种往往会共同出现,这表明单个特性的影响在植物群落中会累积。四角分析发现,特性与野外可燃性度量标准之间存在统计学上的显著关系。与增加野外可燃性度量标准显著相关的特性是:体积密度(负相关)和碳氢化合物数量、比叶面积和表面积与体积比(均为正相关)。我们的研究表明,一些在实验室中已知会影响可燃性的特性可以与野外可燃性度量标准相关联。需要进一步的研究来分离单个特性的贡献,以了解物种组成如何驱动森林可燃性。