Philipps-Universität Marburg, Department of Psychology, Marburg, Germany; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Centre, Göttingen, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Göttingen, Germany.
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Centre, Göttingen, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Göttingen, Germany.
J Psychosom Res. 2019 Oct;125:109811. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109811. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
To examine the role of emotion regulation and its relationship to mental and physical health in patients with heart failure (HF).
Patients hospitalized with HF were screened for depressive symptoms with the two-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) and classified as screen-positive if endorsing ≥1 item and otherwise as screen-negative. One month after hospital discharge, the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) was administered to assess suppression and reappraisal as emotion regulation strategies. In all participants who completed the ERQ (N = 394), all-cause rehospitalization and depressive symptoms using the PHQ-9 were assessed at 1-, 3-, and 6-months after hospital discharge.
Overall, PHQ-9 scores decreased by 6-months (-0.13 points/month, p = .003), and although suppression showed a small association with depression, neither strategy modulated the slope of the decline in depressive symptoms. Multivariable-adjusted Cox models showed that reappraisal and suppression were not related to all-cause rehospitalization in the entire cohort. However, increasing reappraisal reduced rehospitalization risk by 24% for screen-positive patients (N = 311, HR = 0.76, p = .02), but increased it by 94% in screen-negative patients (N = 83, HR = 1.94, p = .009).
Suppression and reappraisal showed specific and divergent associations in patients with HF: Suppression may relate to depressive symptoms. Reappraisal was associated with rehospitalization, but differently for patients with a positive vs. negative depression screen. Further studies are needed to examine whether emotion-regulation skill training can improve mental and physical health in depressed patients with HF or ameliorate depression in those at-risk.
探讨情绪调节在心力衰竭(HF)患者心理和生理健康中的作用及其与心理和生理健康的关系。
对因 HF 住院的患者进行两项患者健康问卷(PHQ-2)抑郁症状筛查,若回答≥1 项则为筛查阳性,否则为筛查阴性。患者出院 1 个月后,采用情绪调节问卷(ERQ)评估抑制和再评价作为情绪调节策略。在所有完成 ERQ 的参与者中(n=394),在出院后 1、3 和 6 个月评估全因再住院和 PHQ-9 抑郁症状。
总体而言,PHQ-9 评分在 6 个月时下降(每月-0.13 分,p=0.003),尽管抑制与抑郁有轻微关联,但两种策略均未调节抑郁症状下降的斜率。多变量调整的 Cox 模型显示,在整个队列中,再评价和抑制与全因再住院无关。然而,对于筛查阳性的患者(n=311,HR=0.76,p=0.02),再评价增加可使再住院风险降低 24%,但对于筛查阴性的患者(n=83,HR=1.94,p=0.009),再评价增加可使再住院风险增加 94%。
抑制和再评价在 HF 患者中有特定和不同的关联:抑制可能与抑郁症状有关。再评价与再住院相关,但对抑郁筛查阳性和阴性的患者有不同的影响。需要进一步研究情绪调节技能训练是否可以改善抑郁的 HF 患者的心理和生理健康,或减轻有抑郁风险的患者的抑郁症状。