• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

莫尔豪斯选择责任医疗组织和教育系统(MCACO-ES):提供公平优质护理的综合模式。

Morehouse Choice Accountable Care Organization and Education System (MCACO-ES): Integrated Model Delivering Equitable Quality Care.

机构信息

Project Management Office, Morehouse Choice ACO-ES, 1046 Ridgeview Avenue, Suite 4, Atlanta, GA 30315, USA.

Department of Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, 720 Westview drive SW, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 25;16(17):3084. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173084.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16173084
PMID:31450652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6747305/
Abstract

Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) seek sustainable innovation through the testing of new care delivery methods that promote shared goals among value-based health care collaborators. The Morehouse Choice Accountable Care Organization and Education System (MCACO-ES), or (M-ACO) is a physician led integrated delivery model participating in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) offered through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Innovation Center. The MSSP establishes incentivized, performance-based payment models for qualifying health care organizations serving traditional Medicare beneficiaries that promote collaborative efficiency models designed to mitigate fragmented and insufficient access to health care, reduce unnecessary cost, and improve clinical outcomes. The M-ACO integration model is administered through participant organizations that include a multi-site community based academic practice, independent physician practices, and federally qualified health center systems (FQHCs). This manuscript aims to present a descriptive and exploratory assessment of health care programs and related innovation methods that validate M-ACO as a reliable simulator to implement, evaluate, and refine M-ACO's integration model to render value-based performance outcomes over time. A part of the research approach also includes early outcomes and lessons learned advancing the framework for ongoing testing of M-ACO's integration model across independently owned, rural, and urban health care locations that predominantly serve low-income, traditional Medicare beneficiaries, (including those who also qualify for Medicaid benefits (also referred to as "dual eligibles"). M-ACO seeks to determine how integration potentially impacts targeted performance results. As a simulator to test value-based innovation and related clinical and business practices, M-ACO uses enterprise-level data and advanced analytics to measure certain areas, including: 1) health program insight and effectiveness; 2) optimal implementation process and workflows that align primary care with specialists to expand access to care; 3) chronic care management/coordination deployment as an effective extender service to physicians and patients risk stratified based on defined clinical and social determinant criteria; 4) adoption of technology tools for patient outreach and engagement, including a mobile application for remote biometric monitoring and telemedicine; and 5) use of structured communication platforms that enable practitioner engagement and ongoing training regarding the shift from volume to value-based care delivery.

摘要

责任医疗组织(ACO)通过测试新的护理提供方法来寻求可持续创新,这些方法促进了基于价值的医疗保健合作者之间的共同目标。莫尔豪斯选择责任医疗组织和教育系统(MCACO-ES),或(M-ACO)是一个由医生领导的综合交付模式,参与医疗保险共享储蓄计划(MSSP),该计划是由医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)创新中心提供的。MSSP 为符合条件的医疗保健组织提供激励性的、基于绩效的支付模式,这些组织为传统的医疗保险受益人提供服务,促进了旨在缓解医疗保健碎片化和不足、降低不必要成本和改善临床结果的协作效率模式。M-ACO 整合模式通过包括多地点社区学术实践、独立医生实践和联邦合格医疗中心系统(FQHCs)在内的参与组织进行管理。本文旨在对医疗保健计划和相关创新方法进行描述性和探索性评估,以验证 M-ACO 作为一种可靠的模拟器,用于随着时间的推移实施、评估和完善 M-ACO 的整合模式,以产生基于价值的绩效结果。研究方法的一部分还包括早期结果和经验教训,为在独立拥有的农村和城市医疗保健地点(主要为低收入的传统医疗保险受益人提供服务,包括那些也符合医疗补助福利资格的人(也称为“双重资格”))进行的 M-ACO 整合模式的持续测试提供了框架。M-ACO 旨在确定整合如何潜在地影响目标绩效结果。作为测试基于价值的创新和相关临床及商业实践的模拟器,M-ACO 使用企业级数据和高级分析来衡量某些领域,包括:1)健康计划的洞察力和有效性;2)优化实施流程和工作流程,使初级保健与专科医生保持一致,以扩大获得护理的机会;3)基于定义的临床和社会决定因素标准对风险进行分层的慢性护理管理/协调部署作为向医生和患者提供的有效扩展服务;4)采用患者外展和参与的技术工具,包括用于远程生物计量监测和远程医疗的移动应用程序;5)使用结构化的沟通平台,使从业者能够参与并持续培训从基于数量的护理交付向基于价值的护理交付的转变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdea/6747305/3f717b9a7ed8/ijerph-16-03084-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdea/6747305/ebb2dea78945/ijerph-16-03084-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdea/6747305/aa28a8ef7199/ijerph-16-03084-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdea/6747305/3f717b9a7ed8/ijerph-16-03084-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdea/6747305/ebb2dea78945/ijerph-16-03084-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdea/6747305/aa28a8ef7199/ijerph-16-03084-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdea/6747305/3f717b9a7ed8/ijerph-16-03084-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Morehouse Choice Accountable Care Organization and Education System (MCACO-ES): Integrated Model Delivering Equitable Quality Care.莫尔豪斯选择责任医疗组织和教育系统(MCACO-ES):提供公平优质护理的综合模式。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 25;16(17):3084. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173084.
2
Factors associated with hospital participation in Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Accountable Care Organization programs.与医院参与联邦医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)的责任医疗组织(Accountable Care Organization)项目相关的因素。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2019 Apr/Jun;44(2):104-114. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000182.
3
Recent Evidence on the Inclusion of Hospice and Palliative Care Physicians in Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organization Networks.近期关于将缓和医疗和姑息治疗医师纳入医疗保险储蓄计划责任医疗组织网络的证据。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(3):373-375. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0325. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
4
Savings or Selection? Initial Spending Reductions in the Medicare Shared Savings Program and Considerations for Reform.储蓄还是选择?医疗保险共享储蓄计划中的初始支出削减及其改革考虑。
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):847-907. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12468. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
5
Accountable Care Organizations Serving Deprived Communities Are Less Likely to Share in Savings.为贫困社区服务的责任医疗组织分享节约资金的可能性较小。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Nov-Dec;32(6):913-922. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.06.190004.
6
Financial Performance of Rural Medicare ACOs.农村医疗保险管理式医疗机构的财务绩效。
J Rural Health. 2018 Dec;34(1):98-102. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12205. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
7
Accountable Care Organization Leader Perspectives on the Medicare Shared Savings Program: A Qualitative Study.责任医疗组织领导者对医疗保险共享储蓄计划的看法:一项定性研究。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e240126. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0126.
8
Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations in Four States: Implementation and Early Impacts.四个州的医疗补助管理式医疗组织:实施与早期影响。
Milbank Q. 2019 Jun;97(2):583-619. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12386. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
9
Medicare Accountable Care Organizations of Diverse Structures Achieve Comparable Quality and Cost Performance.不同结构的医疗保险责任制医疗组织实现了可比的质量和成本绩效。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2303-2323. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12829. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
10
A taxonomy of hospitals participating in Medicare accountable care organizations.参与医疗保险责任制医疗机构的分类法。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2019 Apr/Jun;44(2):93-103. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000159.

引用本文的文献

1
Does value-based healthcare support patient-centred care? A scoping review of the evidence.基于价值的医疗保健是否支持以患者为中心的护理?证据的范围审查。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 10;13(7):e070193. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070193.
2
Exploring the Discursive Emphasis on Patients and Coaches Who Participated in Technology-Assisted Diabetes Self-management Education: Clinical Implementation Study of Health360x.探索参与技术辅助糖尿病自我管理教育的患者和教练的话语重点:Health360x 的临床实施研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 18;24(3):e23535. doi: 10.2196/23535.
3
The implementation of value-based healthcare: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Achieving Health Equity with e-Healthystrides©: Patient Perspectives of a Consumer Health Information Technology Application.利用电子健康大步迈向健康公平:消费者健康信息技术应用的患者视角。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Jun 13;29(Suppl 2):393-404. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S2.393. eCollection 2019.
2
The Future of Health Equity in America: Addressing the Multiple, Intersecting Determinants of Health.美国健康公平的未来:应对健康的多重、相交决定因素。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Jun 13;29(Suppl 2):343-344. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S2.343. eCollection 2019.
3
Applying a Health Equity Lens to Evaluate and Inform Policy.
基于价值的医疗保健的实施:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07489-2.
4
Linkage Between Inclusive Digital Finance and High-Tech Enterprise Innovation Performance: Role of Debt and Equity Financing.普惠数字金融与高科技企业创新绩效之间的联系:债务融资与股权融资的作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 28;12:814408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.814408. eCollection 2021.
5
Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Value-Based Care Models in New Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations in Massachusetts: A Study Protocol.马萨诸塞州新的 Medicaid 责任医疗组织中实施基于价值的护理模式的障碍和促进因素:研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 6;9:645665. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.645665. eCollection 2021.
6
Working Agenda for Black Mothers: A Position Paper From the Association of Black Cardiologists on Solutions to Improving Black Maternal Health.黑人母亲工作议程:黑人心脏病学家协会关于改善黑人孕产妇健康解决方案的立场文件。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Feb;14(2):e007643. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007643. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
7
Community-Based Participatory Research in Action: The Patient-Centered Medical Home and Neighborhood.基于社区的参与式研究实践:以患者为中心的医疗之家和社区。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720968456. doi: 10.1177/2150132720968456.
8
The Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) Translational Research Network: Building and Sustaining Capacity for Multi-Site Basic Biomedical, Clinical and Behavioral Research.少数民族机构研究中心(RCMI)转化研究网络:建立和维持多地点基础生物医学、临床和行为研究的能力。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Feb 21;29(Suppl 1):135-144. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S1.135. eCollection 2019.
运用健康公平视角评估和为政策提供信息。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Jun 13;29(Suppl 2):329-342. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S2.329. eCollection 2019.
4
Leveraging Science to Advance Health Equity: A Regional Health Policy Research Center's Approach.利用科学推进健康公平:区域卫生政策研究中心的方法。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Jun 13;29(Suppl 2):323-328. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S2.323. eCollection 2019.
5
National Health Expenditure Projections, 2018-27: Economic And Demographic Trends Drive Spending And Enrollment Growth.2018-2027 年全国卫生支出预测:经济和人口趋势推动支出和参保人数增长。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):491-501. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05499. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
6
DEMOCRATIZING DISCOVERY HEALTH WITH N=Me.借助“N等于我”实现发现健康的民主化。
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2018;129:215-234.
7
Early Performance of Accountable Care Organizations in Medicare.医疗保险中责任医疗组织的早期表现。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2357-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1600142. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
8
SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records.基于快速医疗互操作性资源的智能医疗:一个用于电子健康记录的基于标准的、可互操作的应用程序平台。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Sep;23(5):899-908. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv189. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
9
Accountable Health Communities--Addressing Social Needs through Medicare and Medicaid.责任医疗社区——通过医疗保险和医疗补助解决社会需求
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 7;374(1):8-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1512532. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
10
Patients in context--EHR capture of social and behavioral determinants of health.背景中的患者——电子健康记录对健康的社会和行为决定因素的捕捉
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):698-701. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1413945.