• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越“驾驶”:评估、表现与学习之间的关系。

Beyond 'driving': The relationship between assessment, performance and learning.

机构信息

Centre for Health Education Scholarship, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2020 Jan;54(1):54-59. doi: 10.1111/medu.13935. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1111/medu.13935
PMID:31452222
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Is the statement 'assessment drives learning' a myth?

BACKGROUND

Instructors create assessments and students respond to these assessments. Although such responses are often labelled indications of learning, the responses educators observe can also be considered a performance. When responses are aligned with generating stable changes, then assessment drives learning. When responses are not aligned with stable changes, we must consider them to be something else: a performance put on partially or fully for the sake of implying capability rather than actual learning. The alignment between the assessments educators create and the way students respond to these assessments is determined by the actions students take in our curriculum, in preparation for our assessments and after engaging with our assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Not all assessments need to or should support learning, but when we assume all assessments 'drive learning', we endorse the myth that assessment is necessarily a formative aspect of our curricula. When we create assessments that encourage performance activities such as cramming, competing for tutorial airtime and impression management in the clinical setting we drive students to a performance. By thinking about how our students, institutions, curricula and assessments support learning and how well they support performance, we can modify and more fully align our curricular and assessment efforts to support learners in achieving their (and our) desired outcome. So, is the phrase 'assessment drives learning' a myth? This paper will conclude that it often is but we as educators must, through our leadership, move this myth towards a reality.

摘要

目的

“评估推动学习”是一个谬论吗?

背景

教师创建评估,学生对这些评估做出回应。尽管这些回应通常被标记为学习的迹象,但教育者观察到的回应也可以被视为一种表现。当回应与产生稳定变化一致时,评估就推动了学习。当回应与稳定的变化不一致时,我们必须将其视为其他东西:为了暗示能力而不是实际学习而部分或完全表现出来的表演。教师创建的评估与学生对这些评估的回应之间的一致性取决于学生在我们的课程中采取的行动,为我们的评估做准备以及参与我们的评估后采取的行动。

结论

并非所有评估都需要或应该支持学习,但当我们假设所有评估“推动学习”时,我们就认可了评估必然是我们课程形成性方面的这一谬论。当我们创建鼓励表演活动的评估时,例如在临床环境中死记硬背、争夺辅导时间和印象管理,我们就促使学生表现出来。通过思考我们的学生、机构、课程和评估如何支持学习以及它们在多大程度上支持表现,我们可以修改并更充分地调整我们的课程和评估工作,以支持学习者实现他们(和我们)期望的结果。那么,“评估推动学习”这个短语是一个谬论吗?本文将得出结论,它往往是,但我们作为教育者必须通过我们的领导力,将这个谬论转变为现实。

相似文献

1
Beyond 'driving': The relationship between assessment, performance and learning.超越“驾驶”:评估、表现与学习之间的关系。
Med Educ. 2020 Jan;54(1):54-59. doi: 10.1111/medu.13935. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
2
Beyond assessment of learning toward assessment for learning: educating tomorrow's physicians.从学习评估走向学习促进评估:培养明日医生。
Med Teach. 2013 Jul;35(7):560-3. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.787141. Epub 2013 May 3.
3
[Perception of medical students about formative assessments during clinical courses].[医学生对临床课程形成性评估的认知]
Rev Med Chil. 2014 Sep;142(9):1193-9. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872014000900014.
4
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
Methods to assess students' acquisition, application and integration of basic science knowledge in an innovative competency-based curriculum.在基于创新能力的课程中评估学生对基础科学知识的掌握、应用和整合的方法。
Med Teach. 2008;30(7):e171-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590802139740.
6
Knowing is half the battle: Assessments of both student perception and performance are necessary to successfully evaluate curricular transformation.知己知彼,百战不殆:要成功评估课程改革,既要评估学生的认知,也要评估学生的表现。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 11;14(1):e0210030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210030. eCollection 2019.
7
The Hidden Curriculum of Compassionate Care: Can Assessment Drive Compassion?《关怀的隐性课程:评估能否促进关怀?》
Acad Med. 2019 Aug;94(8):1164-1169. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002773.
8
Online feedback assessments in physiology: effects on students' learning experiences and outcomes.在线反馈评估在生理学中的应用:对学生学习体验和成果的影响。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2013 Jun;37(2):192-200. doi: 10.1152/advan.00092.2012.
9
What do students want? The types of learning activities preferred by final year medical students.学生想要什么?医学专业最后一年学生偏好的学习活动类型。
Med Educ. 2003 Feb;37(2):110-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01430.x.
10
Curriculum-Based Language Assessment With Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students in the Context of Mathematics.在数学背景下对文化和语言背景多样的学生进行基于课程的语言评估。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Apr 5;49(2):189-196. doi: 10.1044/2017_LSHSS-17-0050.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a pain management competency assessment for physiotherapy students: Integrating simulation and written assessments.物理治疗专业学生疼痛管理能力评估的开发:整合模拟评估与书面评估
Can J Pain. 2025 Jul 8;9(1):2512728. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2025.2512728. eCollection 2025.
2
A Scoping Review of Programs of Active Arts Engagement in International Medical Curricula.国际医学课程中积极参与艺术项目的范围综述。
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 May 19;14(1):296-308. doi: 10.5334/pme.1506. eCollection 2025.
3
'Having skin in the game': guiding principles for incorporating moulage into OSCEs.
“身临其境”:将模拟道具融入客观结构化临床考试的指导原则
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Aug 15;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00307-1.
4
Curriculum Indigenization in oral health professions' education worldwide: A scoping review.全球口腔健康专业教育中的课程本土化:一项范围综述
J Dent Educ. 2025 Jan;89(1):34-51. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13690. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
5
Test-reduced teaching for stimulation of intrinsic motivation (TRUST): a randomized controlled intervention study.减少测试的激励内在动机教学法(TRUST):一项随机对照干预研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 3;24(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05640-7.
6
Efficacy of the Gulu University Reproductive Health Simulation Training for final year medical students and interns: a before-and-after study.古卢大学针对医学专业最后一年学生和实习生的生殖健康模拟培训效果:一项前后对照研究。
Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2024 May 24;18:26334941241251967. doi: 10.1177/26334941241251967. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
7
Pediatric Critical Care Fellow Perception of Learning through Virtual Reality Bronchoscopy.儿科重症监护专科住院医师对通过虚拟现实支气管镜检查进行学习的认知
ATS Sch. 2024 Jan 30;5(1):174-183. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0097IN. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Does 'summative' count? The influence of the awarding of study credits on feedback use and test-taking motivation in medical progress testing.“总结性”的成绩算数吗?在医学进步测试中,授予学习学分对反馈使用和应试动机的影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Nov;29(5):1665-1688. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10324-4. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
9
Thresholds of becoming: an exploration of threshold concepts as a means to support professional identity formation in competency-based curricula.成为的门槛:探索阈限概念作为支持基于能力课程中专业身份形成的一种手段。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Mar;29(1):349-359. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10245-8. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
10
The Effect of Assessments on Student Motivation for Learning and Its Outcomes in Health Professions Education: A Review and Realist Synthesis.评估对健康专业教育中学生学习动机及其结果的影响:综述和现实主义综合。
Acad Med. 2023 Sep 1;98(9):1083-1092. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005263. Epub 2023 Aug 25.