• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青光眼护理之旅——信任但不确定且信息不足:一项定性研究。

Journey to glaucoma care - trusting but uncertain and uninformed: a qualitative study.

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Ophthalmology Department, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Exp Optom. 2020 Jul;103(4):484-489. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12955. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1111/cxo.12955
PMID:31452269
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to explore patient perspectives regarding their journey to glaucoma care and sought to understand the determinants that guide their access to tertiary glaucoma care.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients who are glaucoma suspects or had definitive diagnosis of glaucoma were recruited from a large public glaucoma clinic and a private ophthalmology clinic in Sydney. Face-to-face, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted between April and December 2017. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A framework method was used for thematic analysis of the data.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis resulted in the emergence of eight main themes. There was limited patient participation in decision making in their journey to glaucoma care. Consequently, there was great trust placed in the referring clinician. Patients valued their vision and therefore expressed a desire for high-quality care. They placed considerable trust in their specialist but were often unsure how to evaluate the quality of care received. Patients lacked an understanding of the cost of glaucoma care and for some, cost remained a barrier to the access of private care. There were variable experiences with waiting times and the journey to clinic, with many patients making concessions and requiring support to access care.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first qualitative study exploring the perspectives of glaucoma patients in Australia and the determinants of access to care. These findings support and can inform development of patient-centred models of care furthering patient trust and empowerment.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨患者在青光眼治疗过程中的体验,并试图了解影响他们获得三级青光眼治疗的决定因素。

方法

2017 年 4 月至 12 月,从悉尼一家大型公立青光眼诊所和一家私人眼科诊所招募了 29 名青光眼疑似患者或确诊为青光眼的患者。采用面对面、深入的半结构式访谈方法收集资料。访谈进行了录音,并逐字记录。采用框架方法对数据进行主题分析。

结果

主题分析得出了 8 个主要主题。患者在青光眼治疗过程中的决策参与度有限。因此,他们非常信任转诊医生。患者重视自己的视力,因此渴望获得高质量的护理。他们对专科医生非常信任,但往往不知道如何评估所接受的护理质量。患者对青光眼治疗费用缺乏了解,对一些人来说,费用仍是获得私人护理的障碍。在等待时间和就诊过程方面,患者的体验各不相同,许多患者需要做出让步并寻求支持才能获得护理。

结论

本研究是首个探讨澳大利亚青光眼患者观点及其获得护理决定因素的定性研究。这些发现支持并为以患者为中心的护理模式的进一步发展提供了信息,以增强患者的信任和赋权。

相似文献

1
Journey to glaucoma care - trusting but uncertain and uninformed: a qualitative study.青光眼护理之旅——信任但不确定且信息不足:一项定性研究。
Clin Exp Optom. 2020 Jul;103(4):484-489. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12955. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
2
CHALLENGES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF GLAUCOMA IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY; A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF PROVIDERS' PERSPECTIVES.发展中国家青光眼管理中的挑战;提供者视角的定性研究
Niger J Med. 2015 Oct-Dec;24(4):315-22.
3
Glaucoma awareness and access to healthcare: perceptions among glaucoma patients in Tanzania.青光眼认知与医疗服务可及性:坦桑尼亚青光眼患者的看法
Postgrad Med J. 2015 Jul;91(1077):373-8. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-133094. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
4
Impact of referral refinement on management of glaucoma suspects in Australia.转诊优化对澳大利亚青光眼疑似患者管理的影响。
Clin Exp Optom. 2020 Sep;103(5):675-683. doi: 10.1111/cxo.13030. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
Qualitative investigation of patients' experience of a glaucoma virtual clinic in a specialist ophthalmic hospital in London, UK.英国伦敦一家专业眼科医院青光眼虚拟诊所患者体验的定性调查。
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 15;5(12):e009463. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009463.
6
Determining patient preferences in a glaucoma service: A discrete choice experiment.确定青光眼服务中的患者偏好:离散选择实验。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;47(9):1146-1155. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13606. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
7
'Waiting for' and 'waiting in' public and private hospitals: a qualitative study of patient trust in South Australia.南澳大利亚公立医院和私立医院中的“等待就诊”与“等待住院”:一项关于患者信任的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 5;17(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2281-5.
8
The Perspectives of Patients on Health-Care for Co-Morbid Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Qualitative Study.糖尿病合并慢性肾脏病患者对医疗保健的看法:一项定性研究
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0146615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146615. eCollection 2016.
9
Surgical wound care preferences and priorities from the perspectives of patients: a qualitative analysis.从患者角度看手术伤口护理的偏好与优先事项:一项定性分析
J Wound Care. 2023 Jan 2;32(Sup1):S19-S27. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2023.32.Sup1.S19.
10
Barrett's oesophagus: A qualitative study of patient burden, care delivery experience and follow-up needs.巴雷特食管:患者负担、护理提供体验和随访需求的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2019 Feb;22(1):21-33. doi: 10.1111/hex.12817. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Person-centered care in ophthalmology: current knowledge and perspectives.眼科中的以患者为中心的护理:当前的知识与观点。
Croat Med J. 2024 Apr 30;65(2):156-160. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2024.65.156.
2
Self-management challenges and support needs among patients with primary glaucoma: a qualitative study.原发性青光眼患者的自我管理挑战与支持需求:一项定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2023 Nov 14;22(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01527-y.
3
Patient-centred care in ophthalmology: current practices, effectiveness and challenges.眼科中的以患者为中心的护理:当前的实践、效果和挑战。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;260(10):3149-3159. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05666-x. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
4
Experiences of Patients With Diabetes Attending a Publicly Funded Eye Care Pathway in Western Sydney: A Qualitative Study.西悉尼地区参加公共资助眼科护理途径的糖尿病患者的经历:一项定性研究。
J Patient Exp. 2021 Oct 20;8:23743735211049652. doi: 10.1177/23743735211049652. eCollection 2021.