• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Land sparing to make space for species dependent on natural habitats and high nature value farmland.留地以给依赖自然生境和具有高生态价值农田的物种腾地。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Aug 28;286(1909):20191483. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1483.
2
Bird conservation and the land sharing-sparing continuum in farmland-dominated landscapes of lowland England.低地英格兰以农田为主的景观中的鸟类保护与土地共享-保护连续体。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Oct;33(5):1045-1055. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13316. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
3
Assessing strategies to reconcile agriculture and bird conservation in the temperate grasslands of South America.评估南美洲温带草原地区协调农业与鸟类保护的策略。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Jun;30(3):618-27. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12635. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
4
Land-sparing agriculture sustains higher levels of avian functional diversity than land sharing.土地节约型农业比土地共享型农业维持更高水平的鸟类功能多样性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 May;25(5):1576-1590. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14601. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
5
Conserving the birds of Uganda's banana-coffee arc: land sparing and land sharing compared.保护乌干达香蕉-咖啡弧的鸟类:土地节约与土地共享的比较。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e54597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054597. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
6
Sparing land for secondary forest regeneration protects more tropical biodiversity than land sharing in cattle farming landscapes.留地用于次生林再生比土地共享在养牛景观中保护更多的热带生物多样性。
Curr Biol. 2021 Mar 22;31(6):1284-1293.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.12.030. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
Land-Sparing Agriculture Best Protects Avian Phylogenetic Diversity.节地农业最能保护鸟类系统发育多样性。
Curr Biol. 2015 Sep 21;25(18):2384-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.063. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
8
Farming and the fate of wild nature.农业与野生自然的命运。
Science. 2005 Jan 28;307(5709):550-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1106049. Epub 2004 Dec 23.
9
Land-use strategies to balance livestock production, biodiversity conservation and carbon storage in Yucatán, Mexico.在墨西哥尤卡坦,兼顾畜牧业生产、生物多样性保护和碳储存的土地利用策略。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Dec;23(12):5260-5272. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13791. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
10
Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared.协调粮食生产与生物多样性保护:土地共享与土地分离的比较。
Science. 2011 Sep 2;333(6047):1289-91. doi: 10.1126/science.1208742.

引用本文的文献

1
Empirical evidence supports neither land sparing nor land sharing as the main strategy to manage agriculture-biodiversity tradeoffs.实证证据既不支持以土地节约也不支持以土地共享作为管理农业与生物多样性权衡的主要策略。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Sep 2;4(9):pgaf251. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf251. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Why a nuanced, pragmatic focus on yields is essential.为何对收益率进行细致入微且务实的关注至关重要。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Aug 14;380(1932):20250258. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2025.0258.
3
Prospects for cereal self-sufficiency in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区谷物自给自足的前景。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 17;122(24):e2423669122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2423669122. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
4
Geography and availability of natural habitat determine whether cropland intensification or expansion is more detrimental to biodiversity.地理因素和自然栖息地的可利用性决定了农田集约化或扩张对生物多样性的危害更大。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 May 1. doi: 10.1038/s41559-025-02691-x.
5
Sustainable high-yield farming is essential for bending the curve of biodiversity loss.可持续的高产农业对于扭转生物多样性丧失的趋势至关重要。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jan 9;380(1917):20230216. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0216.
6
Using the natural capital framework to integrate biodiversity into sustainable, efficient and equitable environmental-economic decision-making.利用自然资本框架将生物多样性纳入可持续、高效和公平的环境经济决策。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jan 9;380(1917):20230215. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0215.
7
Opportunities and barriers for promoting biodiversity in Danish beef production.丹麦牛肉生产中促进生物多样性的机遇与障碍。
iScience. 2024 Nov 19;27(12):111422. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111422. eCollection 2024 Dec 20.
8
Risk-appropriate regulations for gene-editing technologies.风险适宜的基因编辑技术监管。
GM Crops Food. 2024 Dec 31;15(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2293510. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
9
Long-term relationships of beef and dairy cattle and greenhouse gas emissions: Application of co-integrated panel models for Latin America.肉牛和奶牛与温室气体排放的长期关系:协整面板模型在拉丁美洲的应用。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 9;10(1):e23364. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23364. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
10
Could global norms enable definition of sustainable farming systems in a transformative international trade system?全球规范能否在变革性的国际贸易体系中促成可持续农业系统的定义?
Discov Sustain. 2023;4(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s43621-023-00130-0. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming.高产农业的环境成本与效益
Nat Sustain. 2018 Sep 14;1(9):477-485.
2
How to spare half a planet.如何拯救半个地球。
Nature. 2017 Dec 14;552(7684):175. doi: 10.1038/d41586-017-08579-6.
3
Land-use strategies to balance livestock production, biodiversity conservation and carbon storage in Yucatán, Mexico.在墨西哥尤卡坦,兼顾畜牧业生产、生物多样性保护和碳储存的土地利用策略。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Dec;23(12):5260-5272. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13791. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
4
CONSERVATION ECOLOGY. How can higher-yield farming help to spare nature?保护生态学。高产农业如何有助于保护自然?
Science. 2016 Jan 29;351(6272):450-1. doi: 10.1126/science.aad0055.
5
Assessing strategies to reconcile agriculture and bird conservation in the temperate grasslands of South America.评估南美洲温带草原地区协调农业与鸟类保护的策略。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Jun;30(3):618-27. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12635. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
6
Reframing the land-sparing/land-sharing debate for biodiversity conservation.为生物多样性保护重新审视土地节约/土地共享之争。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Oct;1355:52-76. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12845. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
7
Conserving the birds of Uganda's banana-coffee arc: land sparing and land sharing compared.保护乌干达香蕉-咖啡弧的鸟类:土地节约与土地共享的比较。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e54597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054597. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
8
Wildlife-friendly farming benefits rare birds, bees and plants.对野生动物友好的农业有利于珍稀鸟类、蜜蜂和植物。
Biol Lett. 2012 Oct 23;8(5):772-5. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0367. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
9
Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture.全球粮食需求与农业可持续集约化发展。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):20260-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116437108. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
10
Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared.协调粮食生产与生物多样性保护:土地共享与土地分离的比较。
Science. 2011 Sep 2;333(6047):1289-91. doi: 10.1126/science.1208742.

留地以给依赖自然生境和具有高生态价值农田的物种腾地。

Land sparing to make space for species dependent on natural habitats and high nature value farmland.

机构信息

Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.

Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy SG19 2DL, UK.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Aug 28;286(1909):20191483. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1483.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2019.1483
PMID:31455194
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6732397/
Abstract

Empirical evidence from four continents indicates that human food demand may be best reconciled with biodiversity conservation through sparing natural habitats by boosting agricultural yields. This runs counter to the conservation paradigm of wildlife-friendly farming, which is influential in Europe, where many species are dependent on low-yielding high nature value farmland threatened by both intensification and abandonment. In the first multi-taxon population-level test of land-sparing theory in Europe, we quantified how population densities of 175 bird and sedge species varied with farm yield across 26 squares (each with an area of 1 km) in eastern Poland. We discovered that, as in previous studies elsewhere, simple land sparing, with only natural habitats on spared land, markedly out-performed land sharing in its effect on region-wide projected population sizes. However, a novel 'three-compartment' land-sparing approach, in which about one-third of spared land is assigned to very low-yield agriculture and the remainder to natural habitats, resulted in least-reduced projected future populations for more species. Implementing the three-compartment model would require significant reorganization of current subsidy regimes, but would mean high-yield farming could release sufficient land for species dependent on both natural and high nature value farmland to persist.

摘要

来自四大洲的经验证据表明,通过提高农业产量来保护自然栖息地,可能是使人类食物需求与生物多样性保护最和谐的方式。这与欧洲流行的对野生动物友好型农业的保护模式背道而驰,在欧洲,许多物种依赖于低产但具有高自然价值的农田,这些农田受到集约化和废弃的双重威胁。这是在欧洲首次对土地保护理论进行多分类群的种群水平测试,我们量化了在波兰东部的 26 个正方形(每个面积为 1 公里)中,175 种鸟类和莎草物种的种群密度如何随农田产量的变化而变化。我们发现,与以往在其他地方进行的研究一样,仅在保留的自然栖息地中进行简单的土地保护,对区域范围内预测种群规模的影响明显优于土地共享。然而,一种新颖的“三分区”土地保护方法,其中约三分之一的保留土地被分配给低产农业,其余部分用于自然栖息地,对更多物种的未来预测种群数量的减少最少。实施三分区模型需要对当前的补贴制度进行重大调整,但这意味着高产量农业可以释放出足够的土地,使依赖自然和高自然价值农田的物种得以生存。