• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

米索前列醇给药间隔时间延迟对引产效果的影响:一项回顾性研究。

Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, USA.

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, USA.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 27;19(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2454-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-019-2454-9
PMID:31455215
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6712846/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Induction of labor occurs in greater than 22% of all pregnancies in the United States. Previous studies have shown that misoprostol is more effective for induction than oxytocin or dinoprostone alone. The World Health Organization recommends vaginal misoprostol 25mcg every 6 hours and the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends 25mcg vaginal misoprostol every three to 6 hours. Although route of administration and dosage of misoprostol has been extensively studied, little is known about the optimal dosing interval of vaginal misoprostol.

METHODS

The primary objective of this study is to determine the effect of delayed vaginal misoprostol dosing, defined as any interval longer than 4.5 h, on time to vaginal delivery. Our hypothesis is that the routine dosing interval of 4 hours shortens times to vaginal delivery compared to delayed dosing, even when adjusted for the time of delay. Secondary objectives include the effect of delayed vaginal misoprostol dosing on cesarean section rate, operative vaginal delivery rate, maternal outcomes, and neonatal outcomes. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 323 inductions of labor at one academic institution. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved a vaginal delivery within 24 h. The group who received all doses of misoprostol within a 4.5 h dosing window (Routine Dosing Interval Group) was compared with the group who had any dosing deviation (Delayed Dosing Interval Group).

RESULTS

Of 133 included patients, 64 subjects received routine interval dosing and 69 subjects received delayed interval dosing. The vaginal delivery rates within 24 h were 56% (36/64) and 20% (14/69), respectively (P < 10). Spontaneous vaginal delivery rates were 86% (55/64) vs. 75% (52/69), respectively (P = .13). Kaplan Meier curves demonstrated statistically significant difference in time to vaginal delivery between groups, with a Cox Proportional Hazard ratio for routine dosing interval of 1.73 (P < 10) unadjusted and 1.34 (P = .01) when adjusted for dosing delay.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study demonstrates a significant increase in delay-adjusted time to vaginal delivery when doses of vaginal misoprostol are delayed past 4.5 h.

摘要

背景

在美国,超过 22%的孕妇需要引产。先前的研究表明,米索前列醇在引产方面比催产素或地诺前列酮更有效。世界卫生组织建议每 6 小时阴道内使用 25mcg 米索前列醇,美国妇产科医师学会建议每 3 至 6 小时阴道内使用 25mcg 米索前列醇。虽然米索前列醇的给药途径和剂量已经得到了广泛的研究,但对于阴道内米索前列醇的最佳给药间隔时间知之甚少。

方法

本研究的主要目的是确定阴道内米索前列醇延迟给药(定义为任何超过 4.5 小时的间隔)对阴道分娩时间的影响。我们的假设是,与延迟给药相比,常规 4 小时给药间隔可以缩短阴道分娩时间,即使在调整了延迟时间的情况下也是如此。次要目标包括延迟阴道内米索前列醇给药对剖宫产率、阴道分娩率、产妇结局和新生儿结局的影响。我们对一家学术机构的 323 例引产进行了回顾性图表审查。主要结局是 24 小时内实现阴道分娩的患者比例。接受 4.5 小时给药窗口内所有米索前列醇剂量的患者(常规给药间隔组)与接受任何给药偏差的患者(延迟给药间隔组)进行比较。

结果

在纳入的 133 例患者中,64 例接受常规间隔给药,69 例接受延迟间隔给药。24 小时内阴道分娩率分别为 56%(36/64)和 20%(14/69)(P<0.01)。自发性阴道分娩率分别为 86%(55/64)和 75%(52/69)(P=0.13)。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示两组间阴道分娩时间存在统计学显著差异,常规给药间隔的 Cox 比例风险比为 1.73(P<0.01),未调整时为 1.34(P=0.01),调整给药延迟时为 1.34(P=0.01)。

结论

这项回顾性研究表明,当阴道内米索前列醇的剂量延迟超过 4.5 小时时,调整后的阴道分娩时间显著延长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09e2/6712846/1d02969a981a/12884_2019_2454_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09e2/6712846/bce3ae9c9049/12884_2019_2454_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09e2/6712846/1d02969a981a/12884_2019_2454_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09e2/6712846/bce3ae9c9049/12884_2019_2454_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09e2/6712846/1d02969a981a/12884_2019_2454_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study.米索前列醇给药间隔时间延迟对引产效果的影响:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 27;19(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2454-9.
2
Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.单用米索前列醇与多次使用米索前列醇引产的随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):614.e1-614.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.034. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
3
A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.阴道给予米索前列醇用于引产术前宫颈成熟和引产的不同给药方案比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):158-64. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70267-3.
4
Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.米索前列醇阴道栓剂与地诺前列酮阴道栓剂用于引产的比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Oct;98(10):1268-1273. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13667. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
5
The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial.米索前列醇阴道栓剂与口服米索前列醇在初产妇引产中的疗效比较:一项随机全国多中心试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Aug;98(8):1032-1039. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13580. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
6
Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.足月引产时阴道用米索前列醇与地诺前列酮阴道栓剂的疗效及安全性比较:一项随机试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jul;280(1):19-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0843-9. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
7
Safety of misoprostol for near-term and term induction in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies compared to dinoprostone and primary cesarean section: results of a retrospective cohort study.小胎龄妊娠经阴道使用米索前列醇与地诺前列酮及初次剖宫产用于近期和足月引产的安全性比较:一项回顾性队列研究结果。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Dec;302(6):1369-1374. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05703-2. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
8
Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.米索前列醇阴道栓剂与米索前列醇阴道片用于引产的队列研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 10;18(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1788-z.
9
Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.米索前列醇用于足月引产:一种比地诺前列酮阴道凝胶更有效的药物。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Aug;106(8):793-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08399.x.
10
Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.口服米索前列醇或阴道用地诺前列酮引产:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;188(1):162-7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.108.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal and fetal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor with low dose vaginal misoprostol.使用低剂量阴道米索前列醇引产的女性的母婴结局
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Sep-Oct;39(5):1307-1311. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.5.7072.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Vaginal vs Oral Prostaglandin E1 Analogue (Misoprostol) in Management of First Trimester Missed Abortion.一项比较研究,评估阴道用与口服前列腺素E1类似物(米索前列醇)在处理早期稽留流产中的疗效。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):QC14-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18178.7891. Epub 2016 May 1.
2
Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.使用前列腺素引产:系统评价与网状Meta分析
BMJ. 2015 Feb 5;350:h217. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h217.
3
Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.
平衡米索前列醇的疗效和安全性:比较 25μg 与 50μg 阴道内米索前列醇用于引产的荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2015 Mar;122(4):468-76. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12935. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
4
Interruption of nonviable pregnancies of 24-28 weeks' gestation using medical methods: release date June 2013 SFP guideline #20133.使用医疗方法中断 24-28 孕周的不可存活妊娠:发布日期 2013 年 6 月 SFP 指南 #20133。
Contraception. 2013 Sep;88(3):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 May 9.
5
The distribution and predictive value of Bishop scores in nulliparas between 37 and 42 weeks gestation.孕37至42周初产妇Bishop评分的分布及预测价值
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Mar;25(3):281-5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.573831. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
6
Comparison of induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone in term primigravidae.足月初产妇中阴道用米索前列醇联合缩宫素与单用缩宫素引产的比较。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Sep;24(9):1084-7. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.531798. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
7
The use of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynaecology.米索前列醇在妇产科中的应用。
BJOG. 2009 Oct;116 Suppl 1:61-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02329.x.
8
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告第107号:引产
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):386-397. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5.
9
Oral, rectal, and vaginal pharmacokinetics of misoprostol.米索前列醇的口服、直肠及阴道药代动力学
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;103(5 Pt 1):866-70. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124783.38974.53.
10
Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix.宫颈条件不佳的初产妇足月引产术后剖宫产的风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun;188(6):1565-9; discussion 1569-72. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.458.