Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):1180. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7442-5.
Enabling behaviour change in health care is a complex process. Although the use of theory to inform behaviour change interventions is advocated, there is limited information about how this might best be achieved. There are multiple models of behaviour change, however, due to their complexity they can be inaccessible to both researchers and healthcare practitioners. To support health care practitioner behaviour change, this was addressed by the development of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) in 2005. Citations of the TDF and associated papers have increased exponentially. Although not predicted or intended by the authors, the TDF has also been used to investigate health behaviour change interventions. Therefore our aim was to narratively synthesize empirical evidence on how the TDF and subsequent iterations have been applied in health behaviour change to inform future intervention development.
Systematic search of four online databases, combined with searches for citations of key papers and key author searches, resulted in 3551 articles eligible for screening. Of these 10 met the pre-determined inclusion criteria. Screening of full-texts, data extraction and quality appraisal were independently performed by both authors. Disagreements regarding eligibility were resolved through discussion.
Of the 10 included studies three used the TDF and seven used subsequent iterations, the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation to Behaviour / Behaviour Change Wheel to assess and /or categorise behavioural determinants to identify relevant behaviour change techniques. Two studies reported feasibility testing. Most interventions were targeted at diet and exercise. Eight reported an explicit and systematic process in applying the framework.
There is limited evidence of how the framework has been used to support health behaviour change interventions. In the included studies the process of using the framework is not always reported in detail or with clarity. More recent studies use a systematic and judicious process of framework application. From the limited evidence available we tentatively suggest that the steps proposed in the BCW appear to be sufficient for development of interventions that target health behaviour change interventions. Further research is needed to provide evidence in how the framework may be most effectively applied to intervention development.
PROSPERO CRD42018086896 .
在医疗保健中实现行为改变是一个复杂的过程。尽管提倡使用理论来为行为改变干预措施提供信息,但关于如何最好地实现这一目标的信息有限。有多种行为改变模型,但是由于它们的复杂性,研究人员和医疗保健从业者可能无法理解它们。为了支持医疗保健从业者的行为改变,这是通过 2005 年开发的理论领域框架(TDF)来实现的。TDF 的引用和相关论文数量呈指数级增长。尽管这不是作者预测或预期的,但 TDF 也被用于研究健康行为改变干预措施。因此,我们的目的是叙述性地综合关于 TDF 及其后续迭代如何应用于健康行为改变以告知未来干预措施发展的实证证据。
系统搜索四个在线数据库,结合对关键论文的引用和关键作者的搜索,共筛选出 3551 篇符合筛选标准的文章。其中 10 篇符合预先确定的纳入标准。两名作者独立进行了全文筛选、数据提取和质量评估。关于合格性的分歧通过讨论解决。
在纳入的 10 项研究中,有 3 项使用了 TDF,7 项使用了后续迭代,即能力、机会、动机行为/行为改变轮来评估和/或分类行为决定因素,以确定相关的行为改变技术。两项研究报告了可行性测试。大多数干预措施针对饮食和运动。八项研究报告了应用框架的明确和系统过程。
关于框架如何用于支持健康行为改变干预措施的证据有限。在纳入的研究中,框架的使用过程并不总是详细或清晰地报告。最近的研究使用了系统和明智的框架应用过程。根据有限的可用证据,我们初步认为 BCW 提出的步骤似乎足以开发针对健康行为改变干预措施的干预措施。需要进一步的研究来提供有关框架如何最有效地应用于干预措施开发的证据。
PROSPERO CRD42018086896。