Surianto Surianto, Alim Syahirul, Nindrea Ricvan Dana, Trisnantoro Laksono
Doctoral Program, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta City, Indonesia.
Department of Nursing Sains, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta City, Indonesia.
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Jul 13;7(13):2213-2219. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.614. eCollection 2019 Jul 15.
The recently concluded World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction (WCDRR) in Sendai, Japan and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 (SFDRR) have set renewed priorities for disaster risk reduction (DRR) for the next 15 years. This framework is the main guiding instrument for Disaster Risk Management (DRM) within the scope of sustainable development and the eradication of poverty. Disaster management policies and practices should be based on an understanding of risks, not just on an ideological level. Gap and key challenges identified include Still weak coordination, cooperation and linkages among the sectors related to DRR, Lacks of skills in loss assessment and post disaster needs, lack of strategic research agenda, absence of consensus regarding terminology, and limited coordination between stakeholders. The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of why disaster risk reduction efforts undertaken by regional policy often fail to improve future disaster responses. These findings can be used to help guide to improve regional policy in disaster risk reduction processes. This research is a systematic review study by collecting articles that are relevant to International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. From the analysis, we found that all four priorities for action in the Sendai Framework are relevant to Disaster Risk Management (DRM) field as follows: 1). Understanding disaster risk; 2). Strengthening disaster risk governance to manage disaster risk; 3). Investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience and 4). Enhancing disaster preparedness for effective response and to "Build Back Better" in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction.
最近在日本仙台结束的世界减灾大会（WCDRR）以及《2015 - 2030年仙台减灾框架》（SFDRR）为未来15年的减灾工作确定了新的优先事项。该框架是可持续发展和消除贫困范围内灾害风险管理（DRM）的主要指导工具。灾害管理政策和实践应基于对风险的理解，而不仅仅是在意识形态层面。已确定的差距和关键挑战包括：减灾相关部门之间的协调、合作和联系仍然薄弱；损失评估和灾后需求方面缺乏技能；缺乏战略研究议程；在术语方面缺乏共识；以及利益相关者之间的协调有限。本研究的目的是了解为什么区域政策所开展的减灾努力往往未能改善未来的灾害应对。这些研究结果可用于帮助指导改进减灾过程中的区域政策。本研究是一项系统综述研究，通过收集与《国际灾害风险科学杂志》相关的文章进行。通过分析，我们发现仙台框架中的所有四个行动优先事项与灾害风险管理（DRM）领域相关，具体如下：1）. 了解灾害风险；2）. 加强灾害风险治理以管理灾害风险；3）. 投资于减灾以增强复原力；4）. 加强备灾以进行有效应对，并在恢复、重建和复原中“更好地重建”。
