Department of General Practice, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Caulfield Pain Management and Research Centre, Caulfield Hospital, Caulfield, Australia.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019 Aug 29;19(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2642-1.
The neurobiology of persistent pain shares common underlying psychobiology with that of traumatic stress. Modern treatments for traumatic stress often involve bottom-up sensorimotor retraining/exposure therapies, where breath, movement, balance and mindfulness, are used to target underlying psychobiology. Vigorous exercise, in particular Bikram yoga, combines many of these sensorimotor/exposure therapeutic features. However, there is very little research investigating the feasibility and efficacy of such treatments for targeting the underlying psychobiology of persistent pain.
This study was a randomized controlled trail (RCT) comparing the efficacy of Bikram yoga versus high intensity interval training (HIIT), for improving persistent pain in women aged 20 to 50 years. The participants were 1:1 randomized to attend their assigned intervention, 3 times per week, for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and further pain related biopsychosocial secondary outcomes, including SF-36 Medical Outcomes and heart rate variability (HRV), were also explored. Data was collected pre (t0) and post (t1) intervention via an online questionnaire and physiological testing.
A total of 34 women were recruited from the community. Analyses using ANCOVA demonstrated no significant difference in BPI (severity plus interference) scores between the Bikram yoga (n = 17) and the HIIT (n = 15). Women in the Bikram yoga group demonstrated significantly improved SF-36 subscale physical functioning: [ANCOVA: F(1, 29) = 6.17, p = .019, partial eta-squared effect size (η) = .175 and mental health: F(1, 29) = 9.09, p = .005, η = .239; and increased heart rate variability (SDNN): F(1, 29) = 5.12, p = .013, η = .150, scores compared to the HIIT group. Across both groups, pain was shown to decrease, no injuries were experienced and retention rates were 94% for Bikram yoga and 75% for HIIT .
Bikram yoga does not appear a superior exercise compared to HIIT for persistent pain. However, imporvements in quality of life measures and indicator of better health were seen in the Bikram yoga group. The outcomes of the present study suggest vigorous exercise interventions in persistent pain cohorts are feasible.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12617001507370 , 26/10/2017).
持续性疼痛的神经生物学与创伤后应激的神经生物学有共同的潜在生物学基础。创伤后应激的现代治疗方法通常涉及自下而上的感觉运动再训练/暴露疗法,其中呼吸、运动、平衡和正念被用于针对潜在的生物学。剧烈运动,特别是比克拉姆瑜伽,结合了许多这些感觉运动/暴露治疗的特点。然而,很少有研究调查这些治疗方法针对持续性疼痛潜在生物学的可行性和疗效。
本研究是一项随机对照试验(RCT),比较比克拉姆瑜伽与高强度间歇训练(HIIT)对 20 至 50 岁女性持续性疼痛的疗效。参与者按 1:1 随机分配,每周 3 次,共 8 周参加他们指定的干预。主要结局指标是简短疼痛量表(BPI)和进一步的疼痛相关生物心理社会次要结局,包括 SF-36 医疗结局和心率变异性(HRV)。数据通过在线问卷和生理测试在干预前(t0)和干预后(t1)收集。
从社区共招募了 34 名女性。采用方差分析(ANCOVA)的分析结果表明,比克拉姆瑜伽组(n=17)和 HIIT 组(n=15)的 BPI(严重程度加干扰)评分无显著差异。比克拉姆瑜伽组女性的 SF-36 亚量表身体功能显著改善:[ANCOVA:F(1,29)=6.17,p=0.019,部分 eta 平方效应大小(η)=0.175 和心理健康:F(1,29)=9.09,p=0.005,η=0.239;和心率变异性(SDNN)增加:F(1,29)=5.12,p=0.013,η=0.150,与 HIIT 组相比,评分更高。在这两个组中,疼痛都有所减轻,没有受伤,保留率分别为比克拉姆瑜伽组 94%,HIIT 组 75%。
与 HIIT 相比,比克拉姆瑜伽对持续性疼痛似乎不是一种优越的运动。然而,在比克拉姆瑜伽组中,生活质量指标和更好健康的指标都有所改善。本研究的结果表明,剧烈运动干预在持续性疼痛患者中是可行的。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册(ACTRN12617001507370,2017 年 10 月 26 日)。