Li Hong-Mei, Liu Chen-Jun, Shen Yi-Hao, Zhao Li, Yin Cheng-Qian, Yu Ji-Guo, Mao Shan-Shan
Key Laboratory of Exercise and Physical Fitness, Ministry of Education, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, 100084, China.
College of Physical Education, South-central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 2;14(1):22912. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74395-4.
Yoga is effective in binge eating disorder (BED) treatment, but it does not seem effective enough to improve low physical fitness. In contrast, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is effective in improving physical fitness but has never been studied in the context of BED. In the study, 47 young inactive females with mild to moderate BED were recruited and randomly assigned to a HIIT group (HIIT), a Yoga group (YG), or a control group (CG; age, 19.47 ± 0.74, 19.69 ± 0.874, and 19.44 ± 0.63 years; BMI, 21.07 ± 1.66, 21.95 ± 2.67, and 20.68 ± 2.61 kg/m, respectively). The intervention groups participated in 8-week specific exercises, while the CG maintained their usual daily activity. Before and after the training, participants were evaluated for BED using the binge eating scale (BES) and for physical fitness. The obtained data were compared within groups and between groups, and a correlation analysis between BES and physical fitness parameters was performed. After the training, the YG presented significant improvements in BES (- 20.25%, p = 0.006, η = 0.408), fat mass (FM, - 3.13%, p = 0.033, η = 0.269), and maximal oxygen consumption (VOmax, 11.51%, p = 0.000, η = 0.601), whereas the HIIT showed significant improvements in body weight (BW, - 1.78%, p = 0.006, η = 0.433), FM (- 3.94%, p = 0.033, η = 0.285), and BMI (- 1.80%, p = 0.006, η = 0.428), but not in BES. Comparisons between groups revealed that both HIIT and YG had significantly higher VOmax levels than CG (HIIT 12.82%, p = 0.006, η = 0.088; YG: 11.90%, p = 0.009, η = 0.088) with no difference between HIIT and YG. Additionally, YG presented significantly lower BES than both HIIT (15.45%, p = 0.02, η = 0.03) and CG (11.91%, p = 0.022, η = 0.03). In conclusion, Yoga is an effective treatment for BED, but HIIT is not, despite its high efficacy in improving physical fitness.
瑜伽对暴饮暴食症(BED)的治疗有效,但在改善低身体素质方面似乎效果不够显著。相比之下,高强度间歇训练(HIIT)在提高身体素质方面有效,但从未在暴饮暴食症的背景下进行过研究。在该研究中,招募了47名患有轻度至中度暴饮暴食症的年轻不活跃女性,并将她们随机分为高强度间歇训练组(HIIT)、瑜伽组(YG)或对照组(CG;年龄分别为19.47±0.74岁、19.69±0.874岁和19.44±0.63岁;体重指数分别为21.07±1.66、21.95±2.67和20.68±2.61kg/m²)。干预组参加为期8周的特定锻炼,而对照组维持其日常活动。在训练前后,使用暴饮暴食量表(BES)对参与者的暴饮暴食症进行评估,并评估身体素质。将获得的数据在组内和组间进行比较,并对BES与身体素质参数进行相关性分析。训练后,瑜伽组在BES(-20.25%,p=0.006,η=0.408)、脂肪量(FM,-3.13%,p=0.033,η=0.269)和最大摄氧量(VOmax,11.51%,p=0.000,η=0.601)方面有显著改善,而高强度间歇训练组在体重(BW,-1.78%,p=0.006,η=0.433)、FM(-3.94%,p=0.033,η=0.285)和体重指数(BMI,-1.80%,p=0.006,η=0.428)方面有显著改善,但在BES方面没有改善。组间比较显示,高强度间歇训练组和瑜伽组的VOmax水平均显著高于对照组(高强度间歇训练组为12.82%,p=0.006,η=0.088;瑜伽组为11.90%,p=0.009,η=0.088),高强度间歇训练组和瑜伽组之间无差异。此外,瑜伽组的BES显著低于高强度间歇训练组(15.45%,p=0.02,η=0.03)和对照组(11.91%,p=0.022,η=0.03)。总之,瑜伽是治疗暴饮暴食症的有效方法,但高强度间歇训练尽管在提高身体素质方面效果显著,但对治疗暴饮暴食症无效。