Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC-Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC-Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 29;14(8):e0221904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221904. eCollection 2019.
The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) is a self-report instrument measuring distress, depression, anxiety and somatization. The questionnaire has been developed and validated in adult samples. It is unknown whether adolescents and emerging adults respond to the 4DSQ items in the same way as adults do. The objective of the study was to examine measurement equivalence of the 4DSQ across adolescents, emerging adults and adults. 4DSQ data were collected in a primary care psychotherapy practice (N = 1349). Measurement equivalence was assessed using differential item and test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis in an item response theory framework. DIF was compared across the following groups: adolescents (age 10-17), emerging adults (age 18-25), and adults (age 26-40). DIF was found in 9 items (out of 50) across adolescents and adults, and in 4 items across emerging adults and adults. The item with the largest DIF was 'difficulty getting to sleep', which was less severe for adolescents compared to adults. A likely explanation is that adolescents have a high base rate for problems with sleep initiation. The effect of DIF on the scale scores (DTF) was negligible. Adolescents and emerging adults score some 4DSQ items differently compared to adults but this had practically no effect on 4DSQ scale scores. 4DSQ scale scores from adolescents and emerging adults can be interpreted in the same way as 4DSQ scores from adults.
四维度症状问卷(4DSQ)是一种自我报告工具,用于测量痛苦、抑郁、焦虑和躯体化。该问卷已在成人样本中开发和验证。目前尚不清楚青少年和新兴成年人对 4DSQ 项目的反应是否与成年人相同。本研究的目的是检验 4DSQ 在青少年、新兴成年人和成年人中的测量等效性。4DSQ 数据来自于初级保健心理治疗实践(N=1349)。在项目反应理论框架中,通过差异项目和测试功能(DIF 和 DTF)分析来评估测量等效性。在以下组之间比较 DIF:青少年(10-17 岁)、新兴成年人(18-25 岁)和成年人(26-40 岁)。在青少年和成年人中,有 9 个项目(50 个项目中的 9 个)存在 DIF,在新兴成年人和成年人中,有 4 个项目存在 DIF。差异最大的项目是“入睡困难”,与成年人相比,青少年的入睡困难程度较低。一个可能的解释是,青少年在入睡开始时出现问题的发生率较高。DIF 对量表分数(DTF)的影响可以忽略不计。与成年人相比,青少年和新兴成年人对一些 4DSQ 项目的评分有所不同,但这对 4DSQ 量表评分几乎没有实际影响。青少年和新兴成年人的 4DSQ 量表评分可以与成年人的 4DSQ 评分以相同的方式进行解释。