Schroeppel Thomas J, Sharpe John P, Shahan Charles Patrick, Clement Lesley P, Magnotti Louis J, Lee Marilyn, Muhlbauer Michael, Weinberg Jordan A, Tolley Elizabeth A, Croce Martin A, Fabian Timothy C
Department of Acute Care Surgery, UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019 Aug 18;4(1):e000307. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2019-000307. eCollection 2019.
Beta-blockers have been proven in multiple studies to be beneficial in patients with traumatic brain injury. Few prospective studies have verified this and no randomized controlled trials. Additionally, most studies do not titrate the dose of beta-blockers to therapeutic effect. We hypothesize that propranolol titrated to effect will confer a survival benefit in patients with traumatic brain injury.
A randomized controlled pilot trial was performed during a 24-month period. Patients with traumatic brain injury were randomized to propranolol or control group for a 14-day study period. Variables collected included demographics, injury severity, physiologic parameters, urinary catecholamines, and outcomes. Patients receiving propranolol were compared with the control group.
Over the study period, 525 patients were screened, 26 were randomized, and 25 were analyzed. Overall, the mean age was 51.3 years and the majority were male with blunt mechanism. The mean Injury Severity Score was 21.8 and median head Abbreviated Injury Scale score was 4. Overall mortality was 20.0%. Mean arterial pressure was higher in the treatment arm as compared with control (p=0.021), but no other differences were found between the groups in demographics, severity of injury, severity of illness, physiologic parameters, or mortality (7.7% vs. 33%; p=0.109). No difference was detected over time in any variables with respect to treatment, urinary catecholamines, or physiologic parameters. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores all improved over time. GCS at study end was significantly higher in the treatment arm (11.7 vs. 8.9; p=0.044). Finally, no difference was detected with survival analysis over time between groups.
Despite not being powered to show statistical differences between groups, GCS at study end was significantly improved in the treatment arm and mortality was improved although not at a traditional level of significance. The study protocol was safe and feasible to apply to an appropriately powered larger multicenter study.
Level 2-therapeutic.
多项研究已证实β受体阻滞剂对创伤性脑损伤患者有益。但很少有前瞻性研究对此进行验证,且尚无随机对照试验。此外,大多数研究并未根据治疗效果调整β受体阻滞剂的剂量。我们假设,根据效果调整剂量的普萘洛尔将为创伤性脑损伤患者带来生存获益。
在24个月期间进行了一项随机对照试验。创伤性脑损伤患者被随机分为普萘洛尔组或对照组,进行为期14天的研究。收集的变量包括人口统计学资料、损伤严重程度、生理参数、尿儿茶酚胺及预后情况。将接受普萘洛尔治疗的患者与对照组进行比较。
在研究期间,共筛查了525例患者,26例被随机分组,25例被纳入分析。总体而言,平均年龄为51.3岁,大多数为男性,致伤机制为钝性伤。平均损伤严重程度评分为21.8,头部简明损伤定级标准评分中位数为4。总体死亡率为20.0%。与对照组相比,治疗组的平均动脉压更高(p = 0.021),但两组在人口统计学资料、损伤严重程度、疾病严重程度、生理参数或死亡率方面(7.7% 对33%;p = 0.109)未发现其他差异。在治疗、尿儿茶酚胺或生理参数方面,随着时间推移,未检测到任何变量存在差异。格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、序贯器官衰竭评估及急性生理与慢性健康状况评分均随时间有所改善。研究结束时,治疗组的GCS显著更高(11.7对8.9;p = 0.044)。最后,经生存分析,两组随时间未发现差异。
尽管本研究无足够效能显示组间的统计学差异,但研究结束时治疗组的GCS显著改善,死亡率也有所降低,尽管未达到传统的显著水平。本研究方案安全可行,可应用于规模更大、效能适当的多中心研究。
2级——治疗性。