Suppr超能文献

乌尔都语版医院焦虑与抑郁量表用于评估巴基斯坦产前焦虑和抑郁的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and reliability of the Urdu version of the Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale for assessing antenatal anxiety and depression in Pakistan.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK; Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Unity Point Health- Methodist , Peoria, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Asian J Psychiatr. 2019 Oct;45:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Aug 23.

Abstract

This study aims to elucidate the appropriate factor structure for Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS) for assessment of anxiety and depression symptoms during pregnancy among Pakistani women. This cross-sectional study was conducted during a 5 month period (2014) in four teaching hospitals of Lahore, Pakistan. Convenience sampling was done to recruit pregnant women availing obstetrics and gynecology services for routine prenatal or perinatal care in the respective departments of the four institutes. Trained interviewers interviewed the consenting participants using a pre-tested scale. All data were analyzed using SPSS v.20. Factor structure of the HADS was explored using Principal Axis Factoring (PAF) method. Goodness of fit of the factor structure was assessed using the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Cronbach's alpha value for whole scale was good (α = 0.81). Sensitivity analysis involving assessment of Cronbach's alpha value after removal of each item, did not reveal any major deviations in overall internal consistency of the HADS. Parallel analysis suggested one factor solution to be viable. When one factor was extracted as a uni-dimensional measure of anxiety and depression: item 11 (I feel restless as I have to be on the move) and 14 (I can enjoy a good book or radio or TV program) were deemed problematic for having low communalities and factor loading values.

摘要

本研究旨在阐明医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)在评估巴基斯坦孕妇焦虑和抑郁症状时的适当因素结构。这是一项横断面研究,于 2014 年在巴基斯坦拉合尔的四家教学医院进行,为期 5 个月。采用便利抽样方法招募了在四家机构的妇产科部门接受常规产前或围产期护理的孕妇。经过培训的访谈员使用预先测试的量表对同意参与的参与者进行访谈。所有数据均使用 SPSS v.20 进行分析。使用主成分分析(PAF)方法探索 HADS 的因子结构。使用验证性因子分析(CFA)评估因子结构的拟合优度。整个量表的克朗巴赫α值较好(α=0.81)。敏感性分析涉及在删除每个项目后评估克朗巴赫α值,并未发现 HADS 整体内部一致性的重大偏差。平行分析表明单因素解决方案是可行的。当将一个因素提取为焦虑和抑郁的单一维度测量时:第 11 项(因为我必须活动,所以我感到不安)和第 14 项(我可以享受一本好书、广播或电视节目)被认为存在问题,因为它们的共同性和因子负荷值较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验