• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 Quidel Solana GAS 检测法、Luminex Aries Group A 链球菌检测法和 Focus Diagnostics Simplexa Group A 链球菌直接检测法在咽喉拭子标本中检测 A 组链球菌的效果。

A comparison of the Quidel Solana GAS assay, the Luminex Aries Group A Strep assay and the Focus Diagnostics Simplexa Group A Strep Direct assay for detection of Group A Streptococcus in throat swab specimens.

机构信息

The Ottawa Hospital/The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Nov;95(3):114866. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.07.004
PMID:31473033
Abstract

We compared three commercially available group A Streptococcus (GAS) nucleic acid amplification tests, the Quidel Solana GAS assay, the Luminex Aries Group A Strep assay and the Focus Diagnostics Simplexa Group A Strep Direct assay, with GAS bacterial culture. A true positive result was defined as one positive by culture or positive by ≥2/3 molecular methods. Two hundred eighty-seven throat swabs (207 children, 80 adults) were collected. The sensitivity of culture was 84.8% (95% CI 77.7-90.3%) with a specificity of 100% (95% CI 97.5-100%). The Solana assay sensitivity was 94.2% (95% CI 88.9-97.5%) with a specificity of 98.7% (95% CI 95.2-99.8%). Simplexa assay sensitivity was 99.3% (95% CI 96.0-99.9%) with a specificity of 95.3% (95% CI 90.6-98.1%). Aries assay sensitivity was 96.4% (95% CI 91.8-98.8%) with a specificity of 98.0% (95% CI 94.2-99.6%). In summary, all the molecular methods evaluated showed high sensitivity and specificity and were more sensitive than culture.

摘要

我们比较了三种市售的 A 组链球菌(GAS)核酸扩增检测试剂盒,即 Quidel Solana GAS 检测试剂盒、Luminex Aries Group A Strep 检测试剂盒和 Focus Diagnostics Simplexa Group A Strep Direct 检测试剂盒,与 GAS 细菌培养进行比较。真阳性结果定义为培养阳性或≥2/3 分子方法阳性。采集了 287 份咽喉拭子(207 名儿童,80 名成人)。培养的敏感性为 84.8%(95%CI 77.7-90.3%),特异性为 100%(95%CI 97.5-100%)。Solana 检测试剂盒的敏感性为 94.2%(95%CI 88.9-97.5%),特异性为 98.7%(95%CI 95.2-99.8%)。Simplexa 检测试剂盒的敏感性为 99.3%(95%CI 96.0-99.9%),特异性为 95.3%(95%CI 90.6-98.1%)。Aries 检测试剂盒的敏感性为 96.4%(95%CI 91.8-98.8%),特异性为 98.0%(95%CI 94.2-99.6%)。综上所述,所有评估的分子方法均表现出高敏感性和特异性,且比培养更敏感。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the Quidel Solana GAS assay, the Luminex Aries Group A Strep assay and the Focus Diagnostics Simplexa Group A Strep Direct assay for detection of Group A Streptococcus in throat swab specimens.比较 Quidel Solana GAS 检测法、Luminex Aries Group A 链球菌检测法和 Focus Diagnostics Simplexa Group A 链球菌直接检测法在咽喉拭子标本中检测 A 组链球菌的效果。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Nov;95(3):114866. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
2
Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the Automated Aries Group A Strep PCR Assay from Throat Swabs.《Aries Group A 链球菌自动化检测试剂盒(咽拭子样本)多中心临床评估》
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jan 30;57(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01482-18. Print 2019 Feb.
3
A comparison of the Quidel Solana HSV 1 + 2/VZV Assay, the Focus Diagnostics Simplexa HSV 1 & 2 Direct Assay and the Luminex Aries HSV 1&2 Assay for detection of herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 from swab specimens.比较 Quidel Solana HSV 1+2/VZV 检测试剂盒、Focus Diagnostics Simplexa HSV 1 和 2 直接检测试剂盒与 Luminex Aries HSV 1&2 检测试剂盒对拭子标本中单纯疱疹病毒 1 和 2 的检测。
J Clin Virol. 2019 Apr;113:35-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
4
Evaluation of Simplexa Group A Strep Direct Kit Compared to Hologic Group A Streptococcal Direct Assay for Detection of Group A Streptococcus in Throat Swabs.评价 Simplexa 组 A 链球菌直接检测试剂盒与 Hologic 组 A 链球菌直接检测法在检测咽拭子中 A 组链球菌的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Feb 22;56(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01666-17. Print 2018 Mar.
5
Comparison of 3 Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests and a Rapid Antigen Test with Culture for the Detection of Group A Streptococci from Throat Swabs.比较3种核酸扩增检测方法和1种快速抗原检测方法与培养法用于从咽拭子中检测A组链球菌的效果。
J Appl Lab Med. 2019 Sep;4(2):164-169. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2018.028696. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
6
Multicenter Evaluation of the Solana Group A Streptococcus Assay: Comparison with Culture.索拉纳A群链球菌检测的多中心评估:与培养法的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Sep;54(9):2388-90. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01268-16. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
7
Prospective Evaluation of Xpert® Xpress Strep A Automated PCR Assay vs. Solana® Group A Streptococcal Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing vs. Conventional Throat Culture.Xpert® Xpress Strep A 自动化 PCR 检测与 Solana® 组 A 链球菌核酸扩增检测与传统咽拭子培养的前瞻性评估。
Curr Microbiol. 2021 Aug;78(8):2956-2960. doi: 10.1007/s00284-021-02547-0. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
8
Prospective Postimplementation Study of Solana Group A Streptococcal Nucleic Acid Amplification Test vs Conventional Throat Culture.索拉纳组乙型链球菌核酸扩增检测与传统咽拭子培养的前瞻性实施后研究。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2018 Aug 30;150(4):333-337. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy051.
9
Detection of Group A Streptococcus in Pharyngeal Swab Specimens by Use of the AmpliVue GAS Isothermal Helicase-Dependent Amplification Assay.使用AmpliVue GAS等温解旋酶依赖性扩增检测法检测咽拭子标本中的A群链球菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jul;53(7):2365-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01085-15. Epub 2015 May 13.
10
Comparison of illumigene Group A Streptococcus Assay with Culture of Throat Swabs from Children with Sore Throats in the New Zealand School-Based Rheumatic Fever Prevention Program.在新西兰以学校为基础的风湿热预防项目中,将Illumigene A群链球菌检测法与咽痛儿童咽拭子培养法进行比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Jan;54(1):153-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02440-15. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Review: Current Laboratory and Point-of-Care Pharyngitis Diagnostic Testing and Knowledge Gaps.综述:当前实验室和即时诊断性咽炎检测及知识空白
J Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 23;230(Supplement_3):S182-S189. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae415.