Wang Haixia, Zhang Jian, Jia Huiyuan
School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Shenzhen Mental Health Centre, Shenzhen, China.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Aug 16;13:276. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00276. eCollection 2019.
It has been argued that prosocial behaviors and momentary rewards activate similar reward systems. However, a recent theoretical hypothesis encourages a fundamentally different view. Specifically, the social heuristic hypothesis posits that individuals internalize prosocial behaviors that are advantageous in their daily social life. These advantageous behaviors are fundamentally different from tangible and immediate reward. Our objectives are to test a hypothesis that these advantageous prosocial behaviors are so critical to survival that it is necessary to have a neural system in the brain that leads people to maintain repeated social interactions. These neural systems are different from the computations of rewards because prosocial behaviors are not advantageous if only considering the computations of rewards. To deepen the understanding of the neural systems of prosocial behaviors and reward, we conducted activation likelihood estimation (ALE) to examine brain activation in prosocial behaviors and reward tasks. Prosocial behaviors specifically activated distinct brain systems to a greater degree than reward. These systems were implicated in the processing of social behaviors and included the insula, temporal lobe, and superior temporal gyrus. By contrast, reward specifically activated the lentiform nucleus, thalamus, caudate nucleus, parahippocampal gyrus, and anterior cingulate cortex, which are associated with the brain reward system. These findings suggest that prosocial behaviors are different from reward and involve specific brain mechanisms.
有人认为亲社会行为和即时奖励会激活相似的奖励系统。然而,最近的一个理论假设提出了一种截然不同的观点。具体而言,社会启发式假设认为,个体将在日常社会生活中具有优势的亲社会行为内化为自身行为。这些优势行为与切实的即时奖励有着本质区别。我们的目标是检验一个假设,即这些优势亲社会行为对生存至关重要,以至于大脑中需要有一个神经系统来引导人们维持反复的社会互动。这些神经系统与奖励的计算方式不同,因为仅从奖励的计算角度来看,亲社会行为并无优势。为了更深入地理解亲社会行为和奖励的神经系统,我们进行了激活可能性估计(ALE),以检查亲社会行为和奖励任务中的大脑激活情况。亲社会行为比奖励更能特异性地激活不同的大脑系统。这些系统参与社会行为的处理,包括脑岛、颞叶和颞上回。相比之下,奖励特异性地激活了豆状核、丘脑、尾状核、海马旁回和前扣带回皮质,这些都与大脑奖励系统相关。这些发现表明,亲社会行为与奖励不同,且涉及特定的大脑机制。