Wu Lei, Buchanan Heather, Zhao Yaping, Wang Ping, Zhan Zhao, Zhao Boyao, Fan Bijuan
Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.
Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 14;10:1847. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01847. eCollection 2019.
To translate the Mindfulness in Parenting Questionnaire (MIPQ) into Standard Mandarin and then explore the reliability and validity of this newly translated measure in a large sample of Chinese middle school parents.
We translated the MIPQ using the forward-backward method and pilot tested it on a sample of parents of adolescents (aged 12-16 years) in China. Following minor modifications, 1057 Chinese parents (Mothers or Fathers) in two middle schools (one in the North and one in the South of China) completed the translated Chinese Mindfulness in Parenting Questionnaire (C-MIPQ). To determine test-retest reliability 121 participants completed the C-MIPQ again 2 weeks later. In order to test convergent validity, 395 participants completed the Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS), Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire-Short Version (PSDQ-short) and the Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale (IM-P). The Chinese Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS), Beck Depression Scale (BDI-13), and socioeconomic status (SES) were completed in order to test discriminant validity.
Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the two-factor model indicated in the original study was a good fit. The total score of the scale and the scores of the two dimensions ('Mindful discipline' and 'Being in the moment with the child') were significantly positively correlated with the total score of the MAAS, IM-P and the authoritative parenting style in the PSDQ-short, demonstrating convergent validity. Discriminant validity was established as there was no difference in C-MIPQ sub-scale scores across any of the SES variables except for levels of education (parents with higher education had higher scores on the 'being in the moment with the child' subscale). In addition, the C-MIPQ was negatively related to stress and depression. Cronbach's alpha of the total scale was 0.93 (and 0.88, 0.89 for the two dimensions of the C-MIPQ) indicating excellent internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was good (intra-class correlation of 0.83).
This study is the first step toward establishing the psychometric properties of the C-MIPQ for measuring mindful parenting in parents of adolescents aged 12-16 years; additional studies will be needed in order to test this further.
将《育儿正念问卷》(MIPQ)翻译成标准普通话,然后在大量中国中学生家长样本中探讨这一新翻译量表的信效度。
我们采用前后翻译法对MIPQ进行翻译,并在中国对一组青少年(12 - 16岁)家长样本进行了预测试。经过 minor 修改后,两所中学(一所位于中国北方,一所位于中国南方)的1057名中国家长(母亲或父亲)完成了翻译后的中文版《育儿正念问卷》(C - MIPQ)。为了确定重测信度,121名参与者在两周后再次完成了C - MIPQ。为了测试聚合效度,395名参与者完成了《正念注意觉知量表》(MAAS)、《育儿方式与维度问卷简版》(PSDQ - short)和《育儿人际正念量表》(IM - P)。为了测试区分效度,完成了中文版感知压力量表(CPSS)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI - 13)和社会经济地位(SES)。
验证性因素分析表明,原始研究中指出的双因素模型拟合良好。该量表总分以及两个维度(“正念管教”和“与孩子共度当下”)的得分与MAAS、IM - P总分以及PSDQ - short中的权威育儿方式显著正相关,表明具有聚合效度。除教育水平外(受过高等教育的家长在“与孩子共度当下”子量表上得分更高),C - MIPQ子量表得分在任何SES变量上均无差异,从而确立了区分效度。此外,C - MIPQ与压力和抑郁呈负相关。总量表的Cronbach's alpha为0.93(C - MIPQ两个维度分别为0.88和0.89),表明内部一致性极佳。重测信度良好(组内相关系数为0.83)。
本研究是确立C - MIPQ用于测量12 - 16岁青少年家长正念育儿心理测量特性的第一步;还需要进一步的研究来对此进行进一步测试。