de Bruin Esther I, Zijlstra Bonne J H, Geurtzen Naline, van Zundert Rinka M P, van de Weijer-Bergsma Eva, Hartman Esther E, Nieuwesteeg Anke M, Duncan Larissa G, Bögels Susan M
Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Prinsengracht 130, 1018 VZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mindfulness (N Y). 2014 Apr 1;5(2):200-212. doi: 10.1007/s12671-012-0168-4.
Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale (IM-P) were studied in a general population sample of mothers of adolescents (=866) (study 1). A six-factor structure (29 items) emerged using exploratory factor analysis. A main difference from the original IM-P was that aspects of compassion and emotional awareness were separated into different factors for the self and the child, instead of combined into one factor. In a second general population sample of mothers of adolescents (=.99), the six-factor structure was confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis (study 2). The proposed 29-item version of the IM-P and its subscales were shown to have good internal consistencies, apart from the sixth factor. As expected, a high correlation was found with general mindfulness questionnaires (FFMQ and FMI). Furthermore, the IM-P correlated positively as expected with quality of life and optimism and negatively with depression and dysfunctional parenting styles. These expected indications of construct validity were found in study 2, as well as in mothers (=112) of adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (study 3) which was added to examine whether the Dutch version of the IM-P was also valid in a pediatric population. Overall, these three studies present good psychometric properties of the Dutch translation of the first measure of mindful parenting.
在一个由青少年母亲组成的普通人群样本（n = 866）中，对荷兰版育儿人际正念量表（IM-P）的心理测量特性进行了研究（研究1）。通过探索性因素分析得出了一个六因素结构（29个项目）。与原始IM-P的一个主要区别在于，同情和情感意识方面被分为针对自我和孩子的不同因素，而不是合并为一个因素。在第二个由青少年母亲组成的普通人群样本（n = 99）中，使用验证性因素分析对六因素结构进行了验证（研究2）。除第六个因素外，提议的29项版本的IM-P及其子量表显示出良好的内部一致性。正如预期的那样，发现其与一般正念问卷（FFMQ和FMI）高度相关。此外，IM-P与生活质量和乐观主义呈正相关，与抑郁和功能失调的育儿方式呈负相关，正如预期的那样。这些预期的结构效度指标在研究2中得到了验证，在1型糖尿病青少年的母亲（n = 112）中也得到了验证（研究3），该研究旨在检验荷兰版的IM-P在儿科人群中是否也有效。总体而言，这三项研究表明了首个正念育儿测量工具的荷兰语翻译具有良好的心理测量特性。
