• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吸入器使用技术不当是一个长期存在的问题,与疾病控制不佳相关——一项横断面研究。

Inadequate inhaler technique, an everlasting problem, is associated with poor disease control - A cross sectional study.

作者信息

Padmanabhan Manjulakshmi, Tamilarasu Kadhiravan, Rajaram Manju, Batmanabane Gitanjali

机构信息

Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.

出版信息

Adv Respir Med. 2019;87(4):217-225. doi: 10.5603/ARM.a2019.0021.

DOI:10.5603/ARM.a2019.0021
PMID:31476009
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Dry powder inhalers (DPI) have been in use in the treatment of chronic respiratory diseases for decades. DPIs require proper inhaler technique to ensure appropriate dose delivery to the lungs which in turn provides disease control and hence reduces the economic burden due to frequent acute attacks and hospital visits. Inadequate inhaler technique remains an everlasting problem among patients with chronic respiratory disease. Hence the aim is to assess the inhaler technique in patients using DPI and to determine the factors associated with inhaler technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted and 385 patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were recruited. Patient-related and disease-related factors were noted. Severity of the disease were assessed using asthma control test/COPD assessment test questionnaire and spirometer. The investigator assessed the inhaler technique of the patient against standard checklist.

RESULTS

Nearly 46.2% of the patients performed incorrect inhaler technique. Multivariate analysis showed factors like young age [Odd's ratio (OR) 4.13, CI 1.31-17.8], well controlled disease (OR 2, CI 1.1-3.65), and the patients who learnt the technique from a medical personnel (OR 3.67, CI 1.46-9.24) had better inhaler technique.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the proper use of inhaler is still an unattained goal and significance of correct use has to be reiterated.

摘要

引言

干粉吸入器(DPI)已用于治疗慢性呼吸道疾病数十年。DPI需要正确的吸入技术以确保将适当剂量输送至肺部,进而实现疾病控制,从而减轻因频繁急性发作和就医带来的经济负担。吸入技术不足仍是慢性呼吸道疾病患者长期存在的问题。因此,本研究旨在评估使用DPI患者的吸入技术,并确定与吸入技术相关的因素。

材料与方法

开展一项横断面研究,招募了385例哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者。记录患者相关因素和疾病相关因素。使用哮喘控制测试/COPD评估测试问卷及肺活量计评估疾病严重程度。研究者对照标准检查表评估患者的吸入技术。

结果

近46.2%的患者吸入技术不正确。多因素分析显示,年龄较小[比值比(OR)4.13,可信区间(CI)1.31 - 17.8]、疾病控制良好(OR 2,CI 1.1 - 3.65)以及从医务人员处学习该技术的患者(OR 3.67,CI 1.46 - 9.24)吸入技术更好。

结论

本研究表明,正确使用吸入器仍是一个未实现的目标,必须重申正确使用的重要性。

相似文献

1
Inadequate inhaler technique, an everlasting problem, is associated with poor disease control - A cross sectional study.吸入器使用技术不当是一个长期存在的问题,与疾病控制不佳相关——一项横断面研究。
Adv Respir Med. 2019;87(4):217-225. doi: 10.5603/ARM.a2019.0021.
2
Usage and usability of one dry powder inhaler compared to other inhalers at therapy start: an open, non-interventional observational study in Poland and Germany.与其他吸入器相比,一种干粉吸入器在治疗开始时的使用情况和可用性:在波兰和德国进行的一项开放性、非干预性观察性研究。
Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2015;83(5):365-77. doi: 10.5603/PiAP.2015.0059.
3
Use and inhalation technique of inhaled medication in patients with asthma and COPD: data from a randomized controlled trial.哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入药物的使用和吸入技术:一项随机对照试验的数据。
Respir Res. 2018 Dec 3;19(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0936-3.
4
Effect of Disease Severity in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Inhaler-Specific Inhalation Profiles Through the ELLIPTA® Dry Powder Inhaler.哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疾病严重程度对通过ELLIPTA®干粉吸入器的特定吸入器吸入特征的影响。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015 Dec;28(6):486-97. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2015.1224. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
5
Effect of incorrect use of dry powder inhalers on management of patients with asthma and COPD.干粉吸入器使用不当对哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者管理的影响。
Respir Med. 2008 Apr;102(4):593-604. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.11.003. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
6
Assessment of Poor Inhaler Technique in Older Patients with Asthma or COPD: A Predictive Tool for Clinical Risk and Inhaler Performance.评估老年哮喘或 COPD 患者的吸药技术不佳:临床风险和吸入器性能的预测工具。
Drugs Aging. 2020 Aug;37(8):605-616. doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00779-6.
7
Adequacy of inhaler technique used by people with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用吸入器技术的情况。
J Prim Health Care. 2013 Sep 1;5(3):191-8.
8
The ELLIPTA® Dry Powder Inhaler: Design, Functionality, In Vitro Dosing Performance and Critical Task Compliance by Patients and Caregivers.ELLIPTA®干粉吸入器:设计、功能、体外给药性能以及患者和护理人员的关键任务依从性
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015 Dec;28(6):474-85. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2015.1223. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
9
A quantitative evaluation of adherence and inhalation technique among respiratory patients: An observational study using an electronic inhaler assessment device.一种电子吸入评估设备在呼吸病患者中的使用:一项关于依从性和吸入技术的定量评估的观察性研究。
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;74(2):e13437. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13437. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
Influence of inhaler technique on asthma and COPD control: a multicenter experience.吸入技术对哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病控制的影响:一项多中心经验
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Oct 6;11:2509-2517. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S114576. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Inhaler use technique course: an effective postgraduate training solution for pharmacists to enhance therapeutic outcomes as part of patient education.吸入器使用技术课程:作为患者教育的一部分,为药剂师提供的一种有效的研究生培训解决方案,以提高治疗效果。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 19;24(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05129-3.
2
Effectiveness of an educational intervention about inhalation technique in healthcare professionals in primary care: a cluster randomized trial.针对基层医疗保健专业人员的吸入技术教育干预措施的有效性:一项整群随机试验。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 17;14:1266095. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1266095. eCollection 2023.
3
Are there differences in the patient-reported medication-related problems among asthma and allergy patients? A community pharmacy survey in Finland.
哮喘和过敏患者的患者报告药物相关问题是否存在差异?芬兰社区药房调查。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):1570. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16423-y.
4
Nurses in China lack knowledge of inhaler devices: A cross-sectional study.中国护士对吸入装置缺乏了解:一项横断面研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Apr 7;14:1152069. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1152069. eCollection 2023.
5
The importance of reminders and patient preferences to improve inhaler technique in older adults with COPD.提醒和患者偏好对改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)老年患者吸入器技术的重要性。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jan 4;13:989362. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.989362. eCollection 2022.
6
Closing gaps in asthma care in India - World Asthma Day 2022.缩小印度哮喘护理差距——2022年世界哮喘日
Indian J Med Res. 2022 Jul;156(1):6-9. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_893_22.
7
Treatment patterns and cost of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using multiple inhaler triple therapy in South Korea.韩国采用多种吸入器三联疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者加重的治疗模式和费用。
Respir Res. 2022 Sep 5;23(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02136-0.
8
The effectiveness of large group demonstration training method on the use of pressurized metered-dose inhaler in elderly with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.大组示范训练法对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用压力定量吸入器的效果研究
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Apr;14(4):919-926. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-1612.
9
The Influence of the Pharmacists' Training on the Quality and Comprehensiveness of Professional Advice Given in the Field of Inhalation Techniques in Community Pharmacies in Poland.药剂师培训对波兰社区药房吸入技术领域专业建议质量和全面性的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 12;19(4):2071. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042071.
10
Inhaler devices in asthma and COPD patients - a prospective cross-sectional study on inhaler preferences and error rates.哮喘和 COPD 患者的吸入器设备 - 关于吸入器偏好和错误率的前瞻性横断面研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01246-z.