Bio-Manufacturing Programme, Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology (SIMTech), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, #08-04, Innovis, Singapore 138634, Singapore.
Bio-Manufacturing Programme, Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology (SIMTech), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, #08-04, Innovis, Singapore 138634, Singapore.
Acta Biomater. 2020 Jan 1;101:14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.045. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
Bioprinting technologies have been advancing at the convergence of automation, digitalization, and new tissue engineering (TE) approaches. In situ bioprinting may be favored during certain situations when compared with the conventional in vitro bioprinting when de novo tissues are to be printed directly on the intended anatomical location in the living body. To date, few attempts have been made to fabricate in situ tissues, which can be safely arrested and immobilized while printing in preclinical living models. In this review, we have explained the need and utility for in situ bioprinting with regard to the conventional bioprinting approach. The two main in situ bioprinting approaches, namely, robotic arm and handheld approaches, have been defined and differentiated. The various studies involving in situ fabrication of skin, bone, and cartilage tissues have been elucidated. Finally, we have also discussed the advantages, challenges, and the prospects in the field of in situ bioprinting modalities in line with parallel technological advancements. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: In situ bioprinting may be favored during certain situations when compared with the conventional in vitro bioprinting when tissues are to be fabricated or repaired directly on the intended anatomical location in the living body, using the body as a bioreactor. However, the technology requires a lot more improvement to fabricate complex tissues in situ, which could eventually be possible through the multi-disciplinary innovations in tissue engineering. This review explains the need and utility and current approaches by handheld and robotic modes for in situ bioprinting. The latest studies involving in situ fabrication of skin, bone, and cartilage tissues have been elucidated. The review also covers the background studies, advantages, technical and ethical challenges, and possible suggestions for future improvements.
生物打印技术在自动化、数字化和新型组织工程(TE)方法的融合下不断发展。与传统的体外生物打印相比,当需要将新组织直接打印到活体的预期解剖位置时,原位生物打印可能更具优势。迄今为止,很少有尝试用于制造原位组织,而原位组织在打印时可以在临床前活体模型中安全地停止和固定。在这篇综述中,我们解释了传统生物打印方法中对原位生物打印的需求和效用。定义并区分了两种主要的原位生物打印方法,即机械臂和手持方法。阐述了涉及原位制造皮肤、骨骼和软骨组织的各种研究。最后,我们还讨论了与平行技术进步相一致的原位生物打印模式领域的优势、挑战和前景。
与传统的体外生物打印相比,当需要将组织直接在活体的预期解剖位置制造或修复时,原位生物打印可能更具优势,将身体用作生物反应器。然而,该技术需要更多的改进,以便能够在原位制造复杂的组织,这最终可能通过组织工程的多学科创新来实现。这篇综述解释了基于手持和机械臂模式的原位生物打印的需求、效用和当前方法。阐述了涉及原位制造皮肤、骨骼和软骨组织的最新研究。综述还涵盖了背景研究、优势、技术和伦理挑战,以及对未来改进的可能建议。